Collaborative Approach to Environmental Decision Making

Environmental Decision Making

The collaborative environmental approach differs from the traditional methods of solving environmental problems in several critical ways. It allows the stakeholders to take part in coming up with solutions from the beginning to when the final decisions are made. The involvement of the stakeholders is useful if there are any potential negative consequences for the members. The collaborative environmental approach also encourages innovation and creativity. Innovation helps to sustain our economy. For instance, if the unconventional process used by the government agencies chooses to collaborate with organizations they help solve problems related to environmental sustainability (Margerum, 2011). They do not rely on the previous laws that have passed before but rather they engage more actively in coming up with new regulatory schemes.

Collaborative approach also helps to prevent the understanding of the rigid beliefs of the tradition administrative regulation and also to eradicate the slow moving legislatures (Orts & Coglianese, 2007). The disadvantages include; it has been termed to be time consuming and expensive since the approach involves the negotiation rulemaking which uses a lot of time before a final decision is made. Another disadvantage is if the environmental approach addresses similar issues in different places it may lead to results that are inconsistent. People tend to take different risks from others so it cannot apply where the same law is passed in different places. Concerning this matter, it is better off for the regulations to come up with specific minimal levels then negotiated solutions can be allowed to proceed within these limits.

Therefore, solving critical environmental problems through collaboration generates new kinds of delivery systems through processes that intertwined. Success can only be achieved through re-envisioning possibilities, communicating with each other as well as the use of enhanced technology. In my place of work, I have experienced collaborative planning especially during working on a project since all angles are considered.

 

 

References

Margerum, R. D. (2011). Beyond Consensus. United States: The MIT Press.

Orts, E. W., & Coglianese, C. (2007, DEC 21). Debate: Collaborative Environmental Law: Pro and Con. Retrieved FEB 07, 2016, from http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/190

 

For a Customized Paper on the above or Related Topic, Place Your Order Now!

What We Guarantee: 

100% Original Paper

On-Time Delivery Guarantee

Automatic Plagiarism Check

100% Money-Back 

100% Privacy and Confidentiality

24/7 Support Service

find the cost of your paper