Social Aspects affecting the Minority in the Society

Social Aspects affecting the Minority in the Society

The Peralta and Larkin (2011) excellently demonstrate that the redistricting of some parts of the United States is an aspect that is dependent on the demographic features of the minority. In this light, the authors have in account the southern states, which would be under the influence of the population development of the minority groups in the US particularly the Hispanics. The authors assert that the traditional Latino destination states will be the actual point of concern as an element for reshaping political districts in this region. Such areas tell of the demographic potential of the Hispanics in affecting the decisions made by the legislature. Through research and analysis of the available data, the authors insist that the Latinos do not have the capacity to affect legislative decision-making, and that would not even be possible in the near future. Nevertheless, the authors identify regions with the likes of Virginia, North Carolina, Arkansas, and Georgia that have the potential to form majority-minority districts and affect legislative processes within states and even at local levels. However, the authors do not give any insights into the implications of their findings for the social welfare of the minority groups. It is an area of concern that the social policies put in place are entirely dependent on the rules passed by the majority, yet the society has a large proportion of minority groups.

Gans (1972) boldly trends in a world many scholars will dread to try and explores the positive functions of the less fortunate in the society normally called the poor. His diction is not short of callousness, but the article would not have been vivid enough without such wording in describing the role of the needy in an unequal society. He asserts that existence of the poor make it possible for the execution of the dirty work in the society normally perceived as demeaning yet the communities would need it to survive. In their state, the poor subsidize the activities of the affluent by accepting low wages for their services. They also create jobs by engaging in not so appealing activities like prostitution. The author is well conscious of their economic usefulness in going for unwanted goods on the market. They also shape political aspects in the society while they unite for a common call. But the author seems morally wrong when he glorifies such aspects as the poor being tools for upward mobility of the affluent and being their objects of pleasure as they readily accept to indulge in the red zones of sex. As if they had a choice, the author imagines that such people live for a sex-filled vacation. One would be left in despair when the social welfare of such people is brought into perspective. They are underpaid and thus cannot access such aspects as decent education to better them. There is no sense of equality, justice, and fairness.

Concisely, these two articles provide an insight of the issues ailing the contemporary society.  Peralta and Larkin find a system that is ignoring the voice of the minority groups despite their demographic features. Gans points out the issues of the poor. These two pieces of literature can be used to reshape the perception of the minority and the need in the society. This would serve to initiate equality, justice, and equitable distribution of resources.

References

Gans, H. J. (1972). The positive functions of poverty. American journal of sociology, 78(2):275-289.

Peralta, J. S., & Larkin, G. R. (2011). Counting those who count: The impact of Latino population growth on redistricting the Southern States. Political Science and Politics, 44(3):552-561.

 

For a Customized Paper on the above or Related Topic, Place Your Order Now!

What We Guarantee: 

100% Original Paper

On-Time Delivery Guarantee

Automatic Plagiarism Check

100% Money-Back 

100% Privacy and Confidentiality

24/7 Support Service