Analysis of Lion in the Wizard of Oz

Analysis of Lion in the Wizard of Oz.

Analysis of Lion in the Wizard of Oz

In this world, no man is an island. People need to collaborate with others for us to be successful. There is that part of us that is made complete by others. It is in that regard that we have William Wallace Denslow. He is the one who falls into the picture to qualify the asserted phrase above, which is the thesis. He does a lot to qualify the assertion above. He does this by taking part in the development of the novel, The Wizard of Oz. Denslow collaborates with Frank Baum in the development of that book (Burger, 2012). It is through their collaboration that the piece of literature I considered great in American history. Denslow does his part, which is even more artistic. This is helpful to Baum as his work is also promoted this way. Baum writes the script for the book while Denslow involves himself in painting and artistic presentation (Burger, 2012). He even sets the costumes. He does a lot in seeing to it that art is promoted through the drawing that he does, about the book. His work I highly artistic that we at times get to remember him from them, though he has done several others in his time. It is his collaboration with Baum that shows us that one cannot work alone. We need to be tied to others for us to realize our potential to the maximum. The volume that the two make is appealing that it gains much recognition in America and beyond.

Talking of Denslow, he was born on 5 May in 1856. He enters into the world of art when he is 16 years of age, where he advances and becomes a great artist of all times, who has the capabilities of being emulated (Burger, 2012). He was born in Philadelphia, and that is the place where he started developing art through the painting of posture that was used for advertisement purposes (Burger, 2012). He further went outside the borders of his hometown to New York and Chicago. This made him have many achievements that were realized through his hard work and strong will. He soon got the recognition that enabled him to get realization even in advertising in newspapers. He worked a lot in cartoons, bookplates and decorated. At one time, he even worked as a designer for books, for Rand Mc Nelly (Burger, 2012). In all his art and drawing, he had a drawing of a tiny seahorse, which can be regarded as his trademark. All the while, he was doing all types of art and drawing but was not concerned with drawing for children as an audience, until a later on.

Denslow had many contributions to the book, The Wizard of Oz. He did this book as a counterpart in Baum’s work, as Baum was the one who did the writing, while Denslow is putting it in drawing (Burger, 2012). He communicated everything through drawing, which in itself was a great achievement in art. It was from Baum that he realized that he could do a lot for painting images by children, which he effectively did. He contributed a lot as he painted the characters in the book to give clear illustrations (Burger, 2012). He also took part with Baum in printing the work that they had done. In the book, he had twenty-four marvelous plates that were colored headpieces, tailpieces pages, titles and other aspects that were to be included in the book. He did all these using art, as he was passionate about what he did. This passion can be seen clearly he came to New York as a newspaper reporter before he embarked on doing art as a profession. He put in the book making it comic and attracting many audiences this passion. Baum also did a lot in getting costumes for the characters in his drawings, as the written work did not have this. This is a clear indication that he needed to be more than keen on what he painted, as the audience would view it, which was children. He, therefore, did all that he could and made drawings which were later advanced in color by printers. This was a great achievement by far, as it was the one, which gave the book a greater audience and liking in the market. In his work, he employed a special kind of personification, which is anthropomorphism (Burger, 2012). This allowed him to make good impressions on his drawings that the book became a masterpiece, regarded to have very little difference from the original masterpiece.

Part 2

In the book, The Wizard of Oz, we have the lion as a character. He is a character who can speak. He has the qualities that are not of a lion. To begin with, he is cowardly. Unlike the nature of a lion, which is brave, the lion here is cowardly. This is seen when Dorothy slaps him when he tries to bite Toto (Burger, 2012). He admits being a coward. This is very unlikely of a lion, which is regarded as brave and unflinching in danger. It is, therefore, ironic that the lion displays a show of cowardice yet he is always depicted as the king of the jungle, who is very brave.

The lion also expresses the character of human beings, which is self-realization. He gets to realize that he is cowardly as seeks to get help from the wizard. The wizard offers a drink, which can be regarded as an alcoholic drink such a gin (Burger, 2012). This is because it gives one temporary courage, which goes away after some time. This is to mean that the lion is reasonable, as he does not want to lose his place in the society, where he is always depicted to be the king of the jungle.

Despite the fact that the lion is depicted as cowardly that he has to look for a remedy, he expresses shows of bravery along the way. There is a clear indication of this when he leaps the road of yellow brick. This is braver as he does this carrying someone on his back. He expresses courage by offering to kill an antelope for Dorothy to eat, yet he is cowardly (Burger, 2012). This makes us fail to discover the true nature of a lion. One may wonder on whether to regard the lion as cowardly. Could these actions be sheer bravado? This is what one asks himself when regarding what the lion does.

The lion also expresses another show of bravery when he deals with the giant spider. Killing the spider is considered a herculean task as the spider has eaten all the lions and other animals in that land. This is to mean that the spider is dangerous and should not be joked around with. In fact, many animals fear him a lot (Burger, 2012). However, the lion does not fear the spider. He goes to the spider and dislocates the head from the body, killing the spider. This is a major show of bravery, despite the fact that we know that the lion regards himself as being fearful and cowardly. This can be an indication that the lion is suffering from mistaken identity. This is because, with the issues in question, it would require one to have real courage for them to be able to deal with the giant spider.

The lion also shows some aspects of humanity in him. He has some behaviors that make him be viewed to have human attributes in him. The lion is friendly. He agrees to accompany Dorothy to Glinda (Burger, 2012). He does this, which is a clear shoe that he is friendly. The acts that he does, carrying his friends, means that he has the feelings that can be attributed to human, yet he is an animal that can be regarded as dangerous.

The lion is also selfless, as some human beings are. When he defeats the giant spider, other animals ask him to agree to be crowned king, which he refuses (Burger, 2012). He promises to do this once he is done with Dorothy. This also shows that he has the determination to finish what he has started. In general view, we would expect the lion to quickly agree to be made a king, as it is a noble position. However, he expresses humility and decides not to take the kingship at that moment as he still has a quest to fulfill to Dorothy, which is accompanying him to Glinda.

It is, therefore, clear that the lion tries to show some traits which are seen in human beings, as we have seen above. This is unlikely of him as we may expect him to be ruthless and unreasonable. He is also mixed in personality as he regards himself as being cowardly, yet he is not. In fact, he engages himself in acts of bravery.

 

References

Burger, A. (2012). The Wizard of Oz as American Myth: A critical study of six versions of the story, 1900-2007. Jefferson, N. C: McFarland & Co.

For a Customized Paper on the above or Related Topic, Place Your Order Now!

Analysis of Lion in the Wizard of Oz