Movie Reflection: Good Night and Good Luck and All the President’s Men

Movie Reflection: Good Night and Good Luck and All the President’s Men.

Movie Reflection: Good Night and Good Luck and All the President’s Men

In understanding Good Night and Good Luck and All the President’s Men, it is prudent to analyze what the two directors communicate and analysis the comparisons between the movies. Film reviews and analysis are important because they make their study worthwhile. They see to it that the study outline and evaluate the themes and motive of the producers. On the same note, we can make comparisons about the context of the film, from where we can derive the various thematic concerns that are expressed. In our case here, a comparison between the two films is important given their political context and their higher coverage by the media. Therefore, the different approaches applied here are geared to get the views that are expressed concerning politic and the influence of media on the public opinions. The study compares and contrasts Good Night and Good Luck and All the President’s Men and shows how it is important.

Good Night and Good Luck and All the President’s Men are similar in that booth have a political setting, whose main influence is the press. In the two films, all the actions revolve around how the press affects various aspects of the novel. In that regard, we can make even more out of the film. All the President’s Men is a political thriller. The press falls into question as we get to see how Bob Woodward, a journalist, investigates the Watergate scandal (Kirshner 57-58). In the long run, the scandal gets too deep into the governments when the president is accused of complicity resulting to his resignation. Good Night and Good Luck is also a film, which tries to explain the aspect of politics and the Media work together, positively and negatively. The film tends to show us how the media plays many roles in governance and shows how the policies therein affect the same. In the movie, we have the press being directly linked to government dealing. We see Murrow going for Milo Radulovich and supporting him, while offering a defense, of injustice, which has been done on him. Murrow is also attacking McCarthy, basing on political motives (Clooney and Heslov).

The issue of governance is also covered prominently in the two films. Governance issues are brought to us in the most appropriate manner as we get to see how the institutions in both films are set up. In Good Night and Good Luck, the presidency is portrayed as an entity that is aimed to serve the interest of a few powerful individuals. This is so as everyone seeks for self-gains in disregard to the common good required of public officers. There is no liberty. The government determines what is to happen to the people. A good example of poor governance is seen when Milo Radulovich is apprehended without trial (Clooney and Heslov). The evidence used to convict him was a justification to ensure that justice is never done. This case demonstrates the bad governance among public officials as McCarthy was a representation of the state entity that does not protect the people. In All the President’s Men, poor governance is demonstrated in the way Woodward and Bernstein make a collusion to steal money. They do this by corrupting public officials into government dealings. For instance, Woodward and Bernstein are in contact with the White House chief of staff, Haldeman and the current leader of CREEP, Attorney John Mitchell in dealings worth millions of dollars (Kirshner 57-58). This is a clear example that the government is corrupt and abates the rule of law to the advantages of a select few. Moreover, the problem of bad governance also affects the media as journalists are paid to cover up corrupt individuals. However, there are instances where the media actively plays an active role in the uncovering theft of public coffer in a bid to see that things are brought back to order.

The role played by that the press is portrayed in the two films in the most appropriate way. This is because the media plays a great role in changing the form of governance and leadership. There is a strong argument here, on whether the press is supposed to report news or to make the news. In our regard, the two films portray a press that makes news through different avenues. This face a lot of criticism, as it is not the purpose of the press to make the news. In All the President’s Men, the press is seen to make news, and bring a lot of changes in political administration. For example, Woodward makes contacts with government’s officials to get information and advice on how to maintain the corrupt system scheme (Kirshner 57-58). He uses Hugh Sloan to make accusations of corruption to John Mitchell and Haldeman. In Good Night and Good Luck, Murrow makes plans on himself on how to defend Radulovich who is being discriminated against due to his sister’s political affiliation (Clooney and Heslov).

In the films, the way through which campaign is used as a way of the emancipation of the masses is in different ways. There are dealings with the people. First of all, in Good Night and Good Luck employs a form of the campaign which issues propaganda and claims which have no basis, all in a bid to save oneself from criticism by the people. This is seen in the way McCarthy accuses Murrow of being in support of the communists (Clooney and Heslov). He claims that Murrow has been a member of a union, Industrial Workers of the World, which is communist movement. Murrow claims that this is a false accusation. Here, McCarthy is campaigning to prove his innocence. In All the President’s Men, we see the campaign in the clearest way. Nixon is pulling all strings to get re-elected the president. Here, we see that campaigns are all aimed at making changes to the existing order (Kirshner 57-58).

Therefore, it is clear that the two films bear some similarities and differences. Considering that the two movies were previewed in different times in history, they depict different views in the ways which politics and the press are entangled. This is clear as we have different dealing with the media to see that they have the necessary form of governance. It is through a deep and critical study that we can see the similar entities that are brought about by the people who are involved in the two films, which help us a lot in understanding the theme of change, brought about by the media, explicitly. This in turn makes us understand the critical role of a free press.

 

Works Cited

Kirshner, Jonathan. “All the President’s Men (review).” Film & History: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Film and Television Studies, vol. 36, no. 2, 2006, 57-58. Print.

Clooney, George, and Grant Heslov. Good Night, and Good Luck: The Screenplay and History behind the Landmark Movie. New York:  Newmarket Press, 2006. Print.

 

For a Customized Paper on the above or Related Topic, Place Your Order Now!

What We Guarantee: 

  • 100% Original Paper
  • On-Time Delivery Guarantee
  • Automatic Plagiarism Check
  • 100% Money-Back 
  • 100% Privacy and Confidentiality
  • 24/7 Support Service

Movie Reflection: Good Night and Good Luck and All the President’s Men

Leave a Reply