Personal Ethical Decision Making Framework

Leadership and Professional Ethics

Personal Ethical Decision Making Framework Assignment

You will write a 3 – 5 page paper in APA format describing your own ethical framework. You will describe the principles and values that are part of your framework, as well as the major theory or theories from the textbook (e.g., Kohlberg’s theory of moral development, Ajzen’s theory of planned behavior, etc,) which inform your framework.

Ethical Framework

An ethical framework is a decision-making model that outlines step-by-step processes for reaching ethical decisions. A framework for ethical decision-making addresses the “how” not the “what” of ethical decisions. It reflects the process of ethical decision-making. It will be similar to a decision-making framework but must include specific ethical considerations. Ethical frameworks frequently take the form of a series of questions such as, “How would I want someone else to act in this situation?” “How would my behavior be judged by my mother/father/children?” “What is the greatest good in this situation?” “What values are represented by this decision?”

Your paper should include the following elements:

  • ·  DEFINE: Define an ethical framework and its usefulness to you.
  • ·  DESCRIBE: Describe your ethical framework and how you developed it.
  • ·  PERSONAL APPLICATION:

o What do you base your ethical framework on? It could be based on: § Religious convictions

  • Ideologies (such as justice, democracy or Confucianism),
  • Your personal values and ethical principles
  • ·  ANALYZE: How does it compare or contrast with the major theories presented in the textbook?
  • ·  SYNTHESIZE: How does your personal ethical framework influence your ethical reasoning and decision-making and behavior?

OLCU 350 Leadership and Professional Ethics Rubric fall 2016

  • EVALUATE: Conclusion – What are your final conclusions about your ethical framework and its usefulness?
    You must have at least 3 references and one may be your textbook. Your paper must be in APA 6th Edition format. Post to Week Three in

the Assignments folder no later than midnight on Sunday of Week Three [200 points]. Your grade will be based on the following:

Content Accuracy 50 pts.
Application 50 pts.
Critical Analysis 50 pts.
Use of Sources 20 pts.
Writing Mechanics and APA 30 pts.

OLCU 350 Leadership and Professional Ethics Rubric fall 2016

OLCU 350 Leadership and Professional Ethics Due Week 3

Personal Ethical Decision Making Framework Assignment

Criteria Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Below Expectations
Content Accuracy 50 – 46 points

Provides clear identification of the interviewee’s ethical beliefs and practices. Utilizing the course textbook or journal articles identify two or more ethical theorists or theories to explain the leader’s approach.

45 – 41 points

Provides fairly clear identification of the interviewee’s ethical beliefs and practices. Utilizing the course textbook or journal articles identify two or more ethical theorists or theories to explain the leader’s approach.

40 – 30 points

Provides somewhat clear identification of the interviewee’s ethical beliefs and practices. Utilizing the course textbook or journal articles identify one ethical theorist or theory to explain the leader’s approach.

29 – 0 points

Does not provide a clear identification of the interviewee’s ethical beliefs and practices. Does not utilize the course textbook or any journal articles, and does not identify any ethical theorists or theories to explain the leader’s approach.

Critical Analysis 50 – 46 points

In-depth discussion of three (3) of the following:

  • ·  Inadequacies, deficiencies, or

inconsistencies in the subject’s

ethics

  • ·  Strengths of the subject’s ethics
  • ·  Presents evidence corroborating

your position of the subject ethical

behavior
Utilizes the textbook and journal article(s) to state your case.

45 – 40 points

In-depth discussion of two (2) of the following:

  • ·  Inadequacies, deficiencies, or

inconsistencies in the subject’s ethics

  • ·  Strengths of the subject’s ethics
  • ·  Presents evidence corroborating your

position of the subject ethical

behavior
Utilizes the textbook and journal article(s) to state your case.

39 – 30 points

In-depth discussion of one (1) of the following:

  • ·  Inadequacies, deficiencies, or

inconsistencies in the subject’s

ethics

  • ·  Strengths of the subject’s ethics
  • ·  Presents evidence corroborating

your position of the subject ethical

behavior
Utilizes the textbook and journal article(s) to state your case.

29 – 0 points

Does not discuss any of the following: · Inadequacies, deficiencies, or

inconsistencies in the subject’s ethics · Strengths of the subject’s ethics
· Presents evidence corroborating

your position of the subject ethical

behavior
Does not utilize the textbook and/or journal article(s) to state your case.

Application/ Learning 50 – 46 points The writer provides a clear and

detailed rationale explaining support or opposition to the subject’s ethics. Identifies a minimum of 3 learnings from the interview.

45 – 40 points
The writer provides a somewhat clear andsomewhat detailed rationale explaining support or opposition to the subject’s ethics. Identifies 2 learnings from the interview.
39 – 30 points
The writer provides an inadequate andminimally detailed rationale explaining support or opposition to the subject’s ethics. Identifies 1 learning from the interview.
29 – 0 points
The writer does not provide a clear ordetailed rationale explaining support or opposition to the subject’s ethics. Does not identify learnings from the interview.
Writing Mechanics and APA 30 – 28 points

The writer clearly demonstrates an understanding of the assignment while using a style, form and language that is appropriate for a college level paper. The writer properly acknowledges the work of others by consistently utilizing current APA style.

27 – 24 points

The writer demonstrates some understanding of the assignment while using a style, form and language that is appropriate for a college level paper. The writer properly acknowledges the work of others with some APA flaws.

23 – 24 points

The writer demonstrates minimal understanding of the assignment while using a style, form and language that is appropriate for a college level paper. The writer properly acknowledges the work of others with major APA flaws.

23 – 0 points

The writer uses a style, form, and language that are not college level quality.
The writer does not acknowledge the work of others, and does not utilize APA style.

Use of Sources 20 – 18 points 17 – 15 points 14 -11 points
The writer has used at least 2 – 3scholarly reference sources. Draws
10 – 0 points The writer has used 2 or fewer scholarly sources of reference.

OLCU 350 Leadership and Professional Ethics Rubric fall 2016

The writer has used at least 3 scholarly reference sources. Draws from primary sources for discussion. The writer has used at least 3 scholarly reference sources. Draws heavily upon secondary sources for discussion. heavily upon secondary sources for discussion.

For a custom paper on the above topic or related questions. Place an order with us.

What We Offer:

25% Discount for New Clients
• On-time delivery guarantee
• PhD-level professionals
• Automatic plagiarism check
• 100% money-back guarantee
• 100% Privacy and Confidentiality
• High Quality custom-written papers

find the cost of your paper