Humanitarian response gap analysis.

Comment on the current status of the evidence –base for accountability and effectiveness of humanitarian actions, particularly through the lens of ANLAP and suggest strategies, which could be utilized to increase the strength of the evidence base in international disasters and humanitarian crises.

Humanitarian actions

Create a strong argument with introduction about the importance of humanitarian response, definition of key terms and the aims of the study.
Introduction:
Evidence-base accountability:
Evaluation tools of the effectiveness:
Strategies to improve the strength of the evidence base in international disasters and humanitarian crises:
Conclusion:

Key terms could be used:
Role of NGO→ some NGOs have their own systems but not shared or agreed on.
Some conferences spoke about accreditations of humanitarian actions but not applied.
UNOCHA competencies.
Where funds come from and where it goes→ NGOs admins, process fees and few left for beneficiaries.
Effectiveness measured by evaluation→ should be evidence based .
ANLAP, ABG, SENDI key reports
“Systematic data collection” lack of quality and lack of strength why and how to improve.
Humanitarian response gap analysis.

Vital resource:

Leave a Reply