Exercise Therapy for Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus


Assignment 2—Literature Review, Part 1: Introduction and Selection Criteria (will be graded upon submission of part 2) Your literature review will be submitted in two parts. The purpose of a literature review is to present relevant literature findings from nursing and related fields, show awareness of what is known about this scientific area and apply the findings to nursing practice. The purpose of this assignment is to provide a basis for the remaining class project that build on this literature review. Only quantitative research studies which are on your chosen nursing research topic will be accepted. Using the skills you developed in critiquing a research article, perform a literature review in a clinical area of interest (nursing related). Below, you will find a list of suggested topics, but that list is by no means comprehensive—choose something of particular professional interest to you in the field of nursing related to one specific nursing action or topic. Consult your instructor if you have any questions or need help deciding on an appropriate topic. Make note that only quantitative research articles that are nursing related and published within the last 5 years are acceptable. Suggested topics: bedside report, hourly rounding, use of SBAR, hand washing compliance, use of telephone call back by nurses, patient education, initiative to increase BSN nurses, alternative comfort measures (non-pharmacological), and mentoring or preceptor programs. This is just a list of ideas and you are welcome to choose outside of this list. In your final paper, you should provide a clear rationale for an important scientific investigation related to nursing science include at least four relevant and recent peer-reviewed journal articles published within the past five years Your final paper should be 10 to 15 pages, including the cover page and references. Submit a copy of each research article in PDF form with your draft in week 5 The following article offers helpful guidelines for constructing a critique of a nursing research article: Cronin, P., Ryan, F., & Coughlan, M. (2008). Undertaking a literature review: a step-by-step approach . British Journal of Nursing, 17(1): 38-43. Note that you will be submitting this assignment in two parts. You will not receive a separate grade for part 1. You will receive your final grade for this assignment when you submit part 2. Part 1 should be 3 to 5 pages and follow this outline: Introduction State the topic you selected and why. List a minimum of four keywords that you used for your search and the databases you used to perform your search. Review List the articles you selected, briefly describing each article and why you chose those articles—for example, relevance to the research topic, methodology used, peer-reviewed content. Summarize the major findings and recommendations of each article. Part 2 should be 7 to 10 pages and follow this outline: Discussion Summarize the overall findings of the articles. Conclusion and Application Describe how these can be applied to nursing research and practice. Be sure to incorporate your instructor’s feedback from part 1, and add the new part 2 content to submit one complete literature review paper of 10 to 15 total pages. Your final literature review will be graded on the following criteria. Criteria Level 3 61- 100 points Level 2 25 – 60 points Level 1 0– 24 points Relevant Research Articles (10 points) Includes four or more relevant articles Includes three relevant articles Includes two or fewer relevant articles Introduction (20 points) Clearly states rationale for topic chosen; includes keywords and databases searched Discusses rationale for chosen topic; does not include keywords or databases Has little or no information regarding rationale for choice of topic; is missing keywords or databases searched Review (20 points) Discusses rationale for articles chosen, methodology, major findings, recommendations Lacks some information on rationale, methodology, findings, or recommendations Offers little or no information on rationale, methodology, findings, or recommendations Discussion

Posted in Uncategorized

Leave a Reply