The Promise of Protection Under His Authority Essay

The Promise of Protection Under His Authority Essay.

In his book Under Cover: The Promise of Protection Under His Authority, John Bevere advocates the notion that under an authority which is divinely established, there exists a secret place made of protection, liberty and provision intended for the people of God. 1 Bevere shares personal examples of why rebelling against divine authority becomes the main cause of many hardships people encounter in church. 2 Bevere also imparts that all existing authority is actually ordained by God. 3 In a nutshell, under Cover’s central theme revolves around facts that God is mankind’s only authority.

Thus, He has positioned authority here on earth to which we have to submit to if, we want to receive His covering giving us provision and protection. Whether we accept it or not, we entire our entire lives under an authority appointed by God. Sure, people grow up, leave home, make lives of their own, but according to Bevere, none of these events ease our responsibilities to authority.

4 ——————————– 1. Bevere, John. Under Cover: The Promise of Protection Under His Authority. New York: Thomas Nelson Publishers. 2. Ibid.

3. Ibid. 4. Ibid. 1 The presence of authority in our lives is never ending: parents, guardians, teachers, pastors, elders, congressmen, even the President. Bevere instructs that the key to the idea of mankind’s relationship with authority is in Romans 13:1-2, wherein it says that each soul is subject to certain governing authorities which exist because they are God-appointed. 5 The same verse also states that whoever resists or rebels against that authority also resists the word of God, therefore bringing judgment on their own selves. 6

While Under Cover makes several positive comments about the qualities of Godly, and therefore good, leadership, there are some unbiblical points of view and directives pertaining to submitting to leadership. 7 I believe that these unbiblical items contradict what the Scripture conveys, in that leadership is functional rather than positional. Leadership builds up men, instead of making it subservient. Another point which I strongly object to is Bevere’s ideology that believers have to submit to authorities of their church even when these authorities are errant.

Remember, Bevere said that if one disobeys his leader, that person is disobeying God, too. Thus, Bevere imparts that God will honor a person for submitting to his leader. However, if one rebels against his pastor ——————————– 5. Ibid. 6. Ibid. 7. Ibid. 2 or leader, God will consider that disobedience with the same severity as disobedience to Him, because according to Bevere, God set this leader over that person. I don’t remember learning that in the Bible. The apostles always encouraged the followers to obey God instead of man.

I believe that there are some doctrines which Bevere espouses which could be dangerous. In these days, men are considered as heads of church bodies and programs. Systems of authority are stressed over personal relationships, and a need to know Christ and submit to directives from the Holy Spirit. In my perception, Bevere’s unbiblical notion of authority will encourage the current errors in the clergy/laity. Bevere also explains that five gifts to the ministry in Ephesians 4:11 are “offices”. 8 I am deeply convinced that these gifts are merely…gifts, nothing more.

It is Bevere’s position that these “offices” should be obeyed without question. 9 This is contrary to the teaching of the New Testament. In the NT, we are taught to honor those laboring amongst us (not over us), and to heed and follow them the way they the Lord. But if they err, there is an anointing which allows us to determine according to the teachings of the Scripture. Bevere posits that Bereans were wrong in seeking out in the Scriptures to discern whether what they were taught was indeed, true. Ibid. 9. Ibid. 10. Ibid. 3 People reading Under Cover could possibly come to wrong and dangerous conclusions, although Bevere did incorporate a disclaimer in his book. Telling his readers to obey someone who directs something wrong, and that this reader will receive blessings for doing this, and that the one giving the orders will be accountable, is a misuse.


Bevere, John. Under Cover: The Promise of Protection Under His Authority. New York: Thomas Nelson Publishers, 2001.

The Promise of Protection Under His Authority Essay

Ashleigh moss Essay

Ashleigh moss Essay.

Assessment Feedback Form Learner: Course / Level: Level 3 Extended Diploma in Uniformed Public Services Unit: 04: Understanding Discipline in the Uniformed Public Services Assessment: title: (4) Know the complex nature of authority in the uniformed public services Issue date: Due: Resubmission: Assessment decision: Criteria Met Y/N IV Y/N (P5) Describe ‘authority’ as it relates to the uniformed public services (Types of authority covered in team leadership) Learner target grade: Learner evaluation

What I think I have done well: What I think I could improve: Does my progress reflect my targets? Student: Signed: Date: Background: Organisations such as the public services can only run effectively if authority is working at all levels.

There are many types of authority which are used in a variety of situations, and at a variety of levels. In some situations if lives are at risk there is no time for discussion, the leader will say what needs doing and the subordinates will do it.

On another level there will be situations where the person in authority might appreciate some advice and consult other team members, before making a final decision.

The following assignment identifies the types of authority and how they can be applied in the public services. Task 1 (P5) Explain the nature of authority in relation to the uniformed public services. Ensure you cover and describe each of the following points: Power Position Status Influence Corruption Disobedience Blind obedience Moral dilemmas Questioning orders

Task 2 (P5) If breaches of discipline occur within the uniformed services then they need to be dealt with. Describe the following pieces of legislation which help to deal with any breaches in discipline: The Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) HM Chief Inspector of Fire and Rescue HM Chief Inspector of Prisons Task 3 (P5) Produce a PowerPoint presentation which describes the following pieces of legislation: Armed Forces Disciplinary Act 2000 Police Act 1997 section 50 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 part IX

Fire and Rescue Services Act 2004 Assessor’s feedback: Actions for improvement: Assessor: Signed: Date: IV: Signed: Date: Power – power is having the ability to direct authority and influence peoples actions and their behavior in different types of situations. Power is basically being in control of what people are doing and they have to do what you tell them to do. Position- having a position in society is having roles and responsibilities and having a role of importance that you have in it.

Status- this is being in a position compared to others mainly to do with authority Influence- this Is having power over people and having an way of yourself where people look up to you and it may affect their decisions behavior and opinions. Like how a normal soldier would Corruption- this in the public services is being dishonest or being a fraud this mainly happens with people in power and mainly involves bribery. They usually use it to get more power and a higher status but doing this is obviously illegal which causes many problems for the services.

Disobedience- this in the public services is a very bad thing because it means that people are not following orders of doing work correctly. It is basically the refusal to do what they are being told to do. But sometimes disobedience can be justified because sometimes people can ask people to do the wrong thing which is wrong and unlawful and goes against their morals. Blind obedience- this is when people follow orders given by a member of authority without question because it was given to them by someone with higher power.

This can be a good thing and a bad thing because a example of this is in the WW2 Nazis murdered millions of people because they were obeying their authority and they were obeying these orders set. Moral dilemmas- this is a dilemma purely based on your mental state, it is when you’re in a situation where there is no right or wrong answer so it is very difficult to decide which one to choose for example there could be two people drowning in a lake but you can only save one but there are two twins so they are both equal you would have to make the moral desisicion who to save. Which would be very hard? But then there could be two people drowning one has a large family and is very loved ect, and then the other is always in and out of prison you would know which one to choose even though it would still be hard and you would have to think about it.

Questioning orders- this is showing a good and bad thing because some can be because they thing what they Are being asked to do is wrong and un lawful so they thing about doing it. But sometimes it can be because of bad discipline. This is bad for public services. Legislation. The armed forces disciplinary act 2000 This acts provides the whole basic rules and the frame work of the army, navy and marines. This legislation gets renewed and made better every year. All forces have their own

Ashleigh moss Essay