Experiment 8: Acetylsalicylic Acid Experiment Essay

Experiment 8: Acetylsalicylic Acid Experiment Essay.


Commonly used as Aspirin, acetylsalicylic acid is an analgesic (pain reliever), which is one of the products of the esterification reaction between salicylic acid and acetic anhydride. This esterification occurs since the hydroxyl group from the salicylic acid reacts with acetic anhydride to form an ester. In this experiment, we will be able to recreate this acid catalyzed reaction, using sulfuric acid as our catalyst in order to produce acetylsalicylic acid and acetic acid. The final product of this reaction will be some crystals, which will be mainly composed of acetylsalicylic acid.

In order to purify our products, we will have to add water to our crystals so that the acetylsalicylic acid can be dissociated from impurities. Using a technique called vacuum filtration, crystals will be held on a filtration paper while the liquid portion of reagents will drained into an Erlenmeyer flask.

To purify our crystals even more, we will have to perform a procedure called re-crystallization, using ethyl acetate as our solvent instead of water in order to prevent decomposition of our products, and then once again we will use vacuum filtration to separate the crystals from the solvent.

After we have finished with the experiment, we will be testing for the presence of salicylic acids in our crystals. Salicylic acid is a phenol and it will react with a mixture of Ferric Chloride by changing the color of the solution into a dark purple. If our crystals change color, it will mean that we still have some impurities and the melting point of the acetylsalicylic acid may be affected by the presence of these impurities.


Table 1.1: Acetylation of Salicylic Acid
Weight of Salicylic Acid | 2.00 g|
Mass of Watch glass + filter paper| 32.43g|
Mass of Watch glass + filter paper and product of re- crystallization| 35.55 g| Mass of product of re-crystallization| 35.55 g – 32.43g = 3.12 g| Melting point recorded of Acetylsalicylic Acid | 128- 130 ° C| Literature melting point of Acetylsalicylic Acid | 135-136 ° C| Actual yield of Acetylsalicylic Acid | 1.56 g|

Theoretical yield of acetylsalicylic Acid | 2.61 g|
Percent yield of acetylsalicylic acid | 60 %|

Table 1.2: Observations during phenol test
Sample| Color|
Salicylic acid | Purple |
Crude crystals | Light Purple |
Recrystallization wet products | Orange|
Solvent (distilled water)| Clear yellow |
*Polymerization may have occurred as a possible side product because of too much heat applied.
Calculations for Acetylation of Salicylic Acid:
1. Catalyst: Sulfuric Acid 5 drops
2. Limiting Reagent: Salicylic Acid
2.00g (1 mol salicylic acid) (1 mol acetylsalicylic acid) = 0.0145mol Acetylsalicylic Acid (138.10g) (1 mol Salicylic Acid)
3. Excess Reagent: Acetic Anhydride

Acetylsalicylic Acid 5. 00 mL (1.082g) (1 mol Acetic Anhydride) (I mol Acetylsalicilyc Acid) = 0.0530 mol (1 mL) (102.10 g) (1 mol Acetic Anhydride)

4. Theoretical Yield:
0.0145 mol Acetylsalicylic Acid (180.2g Acetylsalicylic acid) = 2.61 g Acetylsalicylic Acid (1 mol Acetylsalicylic acid) 5. Actual yield:

Actual yield = (1/2) x (3.12 g crude product) = 1.56g Acetylsalicylic acid

6. Percent Yield:

(1.56 g) x 100% = 59.77 % ≈ 60%
(2.61 g)


Through our calculations we were able to determine salicylic acid as our limiting reagent, which means that the amount of acetylsalicylic acid produced will be determined by the amount of salicylic acid available. Through this experiment, we were able to learn procedures such as esterification, which involves the production of aspirin, as well as techniques such as crystallization and re-crystallization that can help us achieve a pure end product. Impurities, as we were able to observe, play a significant role in this experiment because they affect the quality of our results. The more impurities present in our end product then, the lower the melting points of the crystals might be, and the possibility of a positive ferric chloride test may be higher. Overall, the percentage yield for this reaction was 60 % which could have been due to errors in the process of crystallization, re-crystallization or due to insufficient time needed to dry the compound after re-crystallization.

Experimental Procedure:

Preparation and Crystallization of Acetylsalicylic Acid

In a 125 mL Erlenmeyer flask add salicylic acid (2 g, 0.0145 mol), acetic anhydride (5 mL, 0.053) and 5 drops of sulfuric acid. Swirl mixture until fully dissolved, and proceed to heat flask in a water bath at 50° C for 10 minutes. Allow the mixture to cool down at room temperature and then place the solution on an ice bath until the formation of crystals cease, if no crystals are formed scratch the side walls of the flask with a glass rod. Proceed to add 50 mL of distilled water into the solution and observe the further process of crystallization. At this point you should see crystals in the mixture. Then, set up the filtration apparatus, which should include a flask, Buchner funnel, filter adapter, filtration paper and a rubber hose that will connect the flask to the vacuum device. Test the filtration device with water, before placing the crystals in the solution. Filter the crystalinization product for 5-10 min and finally rinse the crystals with some distilled water.

Re-crystallization of Crude Acetylsalicylic Acid

Dissolve crude product of previous crystalinization in a clean 125 mL Erlenmeyer flask with ethyl acetate (2-3 mL). Gently heat the solution on a hot plate to dissolve the reagents and then allow the solution to cool down at room temperature. At this point crystals should form, if not add petroleum ether to the solution. Place the flask with the solution on an ice bath until crystallization is complete. Once again, set up the vacuum filtration that was used to collect crude crystal product and vacuum dry the crystals for 10 minutes. Perform the ferric chloride test by setting up four test tubes with salicylic acid, products of crystalinization, products of re-crystalinization and distilled water respectively in order to detect the presence of phenol. Finally, after placing the products of re-crystalinization in the oven for 5-10 min record its mass and its melting point.


Our results lead us to think that the possible reason for this low percentage, as well as for the differences between melting point range obtained and the actual melting point (128- 130 ° C 0 ° C instead of 135- 136 ° C) might have been due errors in the time that the re-crystallized sample spent in the oven. This theory is reinforced by the fact that within the ferric chloride test the sample tested negative for phenol, meaning that there was no salicylic acid was present.


1. What is the purpose of the concentrated sulfuric acid used in the first step? The sulfuric acid is used as an acid catalyst in the acetylation reaction. A catalyst is used to lower the level of the activation energy, hence speeding up the reaction. 2. What would happen if the sulfuric acid were left out

It would have taken the reaction much longer to reach the activation energy, and the reaction would have not occurred as fast as it did. 3. If you used 5.0 g of sulfuric acid and excess acetic anhydride in the preceding synthesis of Aspirin, what would be the theoretical yield of acetyl salicylic acid in moles? In grams?

5.00g (1 mol Sulfuric Acid) (1 mol Acetylsalicylic Acid) = 0.0510 mol Acetylsalicylic
(98.079 g) (1 mol Sulfuric Acid)

0.0510 mol Acetylsalicylic (180.2 g acetylsalicylic acid) = 9.19 g Acetylsalicylic Acid
(1 mol Acetylsalicylic Acid)

4. What is the equation for the decomposition reaction that can occur with aspirin?
Water + acetylsalicylic acid acetic acid + salicylic acid

5. Most aspirin tablets contain 5 grains of acetylsalicylic acid. How many milligrams is this? Since one grain = 65 mg, then an aspirin tablet will contain 65 mg * 5 =324 mg 6. A student performed the reaction in this experiment using a water bath at 90°C instead of 50°C. The final product was tested for the presence of phenols with ferric chloride. This test was negative. (no color was observed); however, the melting point of the dry product was 122-125°C. Explain these results as completely as possible.

Within the salicylic acid portion of the mechanism, a polymerization reaction occurred because there was such a high temperature. The polymer that was created was an impurity and due to this impurity the melting point of the product was lower than expected. 7. If the aspirin crystals were not completely dried before the melting point was determined, what effect would this have on the observed melting point? If the solvent is present after the crystalinization, then this will lower the melting point of the product.

Cited Work
Pavia, Donald L. A Small-scale Approach to Organic Laboratory Techniques. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole ; Cengage Learning, 2011. Print. “Acetylsalicylic acid (50-78 2).” Chemical Book. 2008. Web. 23 Jan. 20003. <http://www.chemicalbook.com/ProductMSDSDetailCB5114818_EN.htm>

Literature Article: The melting process of Acetylsalicylic Acid single crystals

The process of crystallization was studied by G. L. Perlovich and A. Bauer-Brandl in comparison to crystal growth of Acetylsalicylic Acid. The present work postulates an analogy to melting processes, looking at melting as nucleation. It is hypothesized that the melting process can be described similarly to crystallization assuming that nucleation of the liquid phase is followed by growth of the liquid phase in two or three dimensions respectively. By applying correlation analysis experimental data was obtained, explained by the layer structure of crystals of Acetylsalicylic Acid. By intergrading the DSC curves the fraction of material molten was calculated. This articled gave us some background information to better understand the results of this experiment and the reactions that occurred trough the experiment process.

Experiment 8: Acetylsalicylic Acid Experiment Essay

Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Research Designs Essay

Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Research Designs Essay.

The experimental research design is one of the most reliable quantitative designs available. Basically, it requires that the researcher conduct an actual experiment in order to prove the research hypothesis. Similar yet fundamentally different from the experimental design is the quasi-experimental design. his paper discusses the procedure in conducting an experimental design research and differentiates it from a quasi-experimental research design. Examples of each are given to facilitate further comparison and contrast. The first step in conducting an experimental research design is to identify the independent and dependent variables.

According to Random House’s dictionary of statistical terminologies, “the dependent variable is the event studied and expected to change when the independent variable is changed. ” (Random House, 2001, p. 534). In Butler and Lijinsky (2005) which is an example of experimental research, the independent variable was the type of rat while the dependent variable was the toxicity level. This meant that the research seeks to verify whether different types of rats would have different acute toxicity levels.

After the identification of the independent and dependent variables, the next step is to randomly select a sample for the experiment.

To randomly select a sample means to make sure that all of the members of the population have an equal chance of being selected (Corder &Foreman, 2009). For example, when seeking to study a school population as is the case in of Stevens & Slavin (1995), random sampling is conducted by placing all of the possible respondents in a list and selecting from that list randomly. In this way, each student has an equal opportunity to be selected for the study. Lastly, once the experiment is conducted, a secure atmosphere is generated wherein the effect of other factors are minimized (Mertens, 1998).

Going back to Butler and Lijinsky (1995), the experiment was conducted in a secure atmosphere where the only variables were the type of rat and the toxins induced to them. All other factors such as the food they were given, the space of their cages and so on were kept the same for the different types of rat. In a quasi-experimental approach, an experiment is also conducted and dependent and independent variables are also selected. Measures to keep all other variables constant are also taken. However, the defining difference between the tow is that quasi-experimental designs do not conduct random sampling (Mertens, 1998).

For example, the quasi-experimental research conducted by Dutton (1986) simply a sample from those that were available. This is not random sampling and therefore the design cannot be considered as experimental but it does fit the quasi-experimental description. In conclusion, it is clear that while experimental and quasi-experimental research designs are similar, they do have an essential difference.


Butler, A, and Lijinsky, W. (2005). “Acute toxicity of aflatoxin G1 to the rat” Journal of Pathology, 102 (4), 209-212. Corder, G. , Foreman, G. (2009). Nonparametric Statistics for Non-Statisticians: A Step-by-Step Approach. Wiley. Dutton, D. (1986). “The Outcome of Court-Mandated Treatment for Wife Assault: A Quasi-Experimental Evaluation. ” Violence and Victims, 1(3) 163-175 Mertens, D. (1998). Research methods in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative & qualitative. Sage. Random House. (2001). Random House Webster’s Unabridged Dictionary. Random House, Inc. Stevens, R. , and Slavin, R. (1995). Effects of a Cooperative Learning Approach in Reading and Writing on Academically Handicapped and Nonhandicapped Students. The University of Chicago Press.

Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Research Designs Essay