Movie Review of a Study in Pink Essay

Sherlock Holmes is always my favorite, not ‘one of’ . Since my father had bought me the first book of “complete stories of Sherlock Holmes”, I have read series of books about him. For many of years, Sherlock Holmes has made many books, Movies, even comics and has been played by different actors, including Christopher Lee, Clive Brook, and Holmes in “A study in pink” Benedict Cumberbatch. , who corporate with Martin Freeman as Dr. John Watson. Since I think I have seen enough words on paper to have a understanding of the Characters, I almost do not watch any film which has relationship with Sherlock.

Movies can never be better than books in my point of view, but when I finish watching “A study in pink”, I think my perspective will change in the future. The movie tells a story happened in 2010: A series of people all commit suicide by taking a poisonous pill. the police are sure that there must be a link, which they can’t find out .

It was Sherlock Holmes who is the only man can help. The man who has an talented brain and created the job of consulting detective. Watson (played by Martin Freeman)is a wound and invalided army doctor, who cannot afford the expensive rent any more and wants to find a roommate to share a department.

The infamous Sherlock (Benedict Cumberbatch,’) was introduced to him, who has an extremely strange life style as well as a mind of genius . Knowing him better and becomimg interested in the case, Watson became Sherlock’s assistant. After a series of incidents, the case became more and more complicated. The person who commit the murder, a taxicab driver, tells Sherlock that his victims took their own lives by playing a game, Sherlock wants to know the reason of the entire case so that he follows the murderer and plays the dangerous game with two pills: one fatally poisonous, the other safe .

At the very moment,Watson shoots the “cabbie”, and he reveals at last that Moriarty masterminded the entire plan. Despite being updated and changed in many places ,the whole film seems natural as a good movie. Producer Mark Gatiss and writer Steven Moffat try hard to stay true to many of the canon facts of Sherlock, which is the most essential and tough part: his disinterest in woman, his drug addiction (he gets happiness from nicotine patches and has tougher time hidden in his flat), and his arrogance and eccentricity. What I love most about the series is the how Sherlock works.

There’s a scene which has dead body in that he starts to inspect. We can see clearly every tracks of his thoughts in his head thanks to the words on the screen. It’s so cool to watch and read along as he solves the case that I just don’t want to miss a second. At the beginning, we see the police are having a press conference about the suicides and everyone in the room is texted the word”Wrong! ” when the inspector says he is sure that all of the death is suiside. This must be the work of Sherlock and they don’tknow how he does it.

There’s also a chase scene where he’s going after a taxi. , which is very exciting . The part that he knows all the streets of London and he uses the signs on the streetsto predict where the taxi is going attracts me a lot . it’s really cool and exciting. On a whole I think this movie is a good one which is hard to find nowadays. The picture is great and the talk between characters is so memorable that they take me to another world which is full of imagination. Our Holmes is different and live in 2010 ,but that is not important at all.

Detective Archetype Essay

Sherlock Holmes and the Doctor share qualities such as higher intelligence, isolation from society, and hyperactivity that shape them into the only ones capable of providing justice for the threatened. The two fit the detective archetype quite well and whether explicit or not, the archetype is prevalent in their stories as well as others. Qualities of the detective archetype are represented through each “detective’s” habits, actions, words, thoughts, and choices. It is complex, interests the reader, and is used by nearly every author of detective fiction.

Holmes and the Doctor express and put forth their higher level of intelligence in everything they do. Their frequent and effective use of deductive reasoning tells them where to go and leads them in their endeavors. Before they can deduce what happened in the situation they are dealing with or find the solution to the problem at hand they must gather the facts.

Both pay attention to detail, Holmes even said, “To a great mind, nothing is little.

” (27) They consider everything – the unordinary to the obvious and the perplexing to the straightforward. Each of the characters has attained a myriad of knowledge which aids them in their reasoning. For the Doctor; he has learned things through experience. He has lived for thousands of years as he is not human and is like an eternal being, in that it can be assumed that he knows just about everything. Holmes’ knowledge, however, comes from experimentation that he conducts in his free time. Curiously, neither was formally educated, yet has a particular interest in sciences. When investigating a clue Agatha Christie commented, “there you go with the science stuff again!” (Dr. Who) which implies that he has already demonstrated his efficacy of science. With their arsenals of intelligence, Holmes and the Doctor will always prevail.

Members of the detective archetype tend to be isolated from society and Holmes and the Doctor live up to that stereotype. In Homes’ case he chooses to be introverted and would rather spend time alone. Because he has a certain haughty narcissism it makes him believe that he is too good for others. When asked if he enjoys the literary works of Gaboriau and his detective Lecoq, Holmes “sniffs sardonically” and responds in an “angry voice”, claiming the book had made him “positively ill.” (14) The Doctor, on the other hand, would choose to be extroverted yet the circumstances of his life do not allow this. He is the last of his kind and does not fit anywhere; he is forced to live a life with few lasting relationships. Sherlock Holmes has few hobbies and most of them keep him isolated from other people. What he enjoys, other than experiments, is playing the violin while he thinks about current cases he is working on.

Another hobby of his that his assistant Watson intimated is the use of narcotics. Watson suggests “On [some] occasions I have noticed such a dreamy vacant expression in his eyes that I might have suspected him of being addicted to the use of some narcotic” (10) Not only is Watson his assistant, but he is the only true friend of Holmes. Likewise, the Doctors’ assistant, Donna, is the only one who remains with him. Theirs assistants are not just there, but they help the detectives solve problems. More importantly, they make Holmes and the Doctor not seem so out of place. Hyperactivity is another characteristic of the detective archetype that both Holmes and the Doctor share.

They constantly jump from one thought to the other. When the Doctor rambles on to himself about the time he spent during Charlemagne’s rule Christie questions, “but that was centuries ago.” The Doctor replies “I have a good memory” (Doctor Who) and moves on to his next thought. As the moment has passed he quickly shifts to the next thought on his mind. Similar to this, Holmes switches subjects rather frequently. In one instance Holmes was able to deduce a man’s background before Watson would even attempt to. To Watson he was merely a “fellow” “walking down the other side of the street.” Without even thinking about it Holmes replies, “You mean that retired sergeant of Marines.”

“The thought had hardly passed through [Watson’s] mind” (14) by the time Holmes had moved on. Higher intelligence, isolation from society, and hyperactivity are qualities that make Holmes and the Doctor fit the detective archetype. Higher intelligence is used by the detectives to deduce information from and interpret the problem. By separating themselves from society the two can meditate on where their focus should be. Hyperactive by nature, these individuals are perfect for their roles. Despite the negative connotations of some of these characteristics, they are able to use them for their benefit to be successful.

Silver Blaze & Sherlock Holmes Essay

English Coursework:Silver Blaze is considered one of the greatest examples of Sherlock Holmes’ power of deduction;Do you agree and why? In Silver Blaze, the crime/mystery is the murder of the horse trainer John Straker and the theft of the prize wining horse, Silver Blaze. Sherlock Holmes and his companion Dr. Watson are called in to investigate the case. His methods may appear extraordinary to others but to Sherlock Holmes himself they are very simple.

Silver Blaze is regarded as one of Sherlock Holmes’ greatest demonstrations of his powers of deduction by the amount of information he gathers through simple actions that would be uninterpretable to others.

The first hint that this story is going to be based purely around Sherlock Holmes’ powers of deduction is the paragraph early on in the story when Holmes and Watson are travelling down to Dartmoor on the train. Holmes says “That it one of those cases where the art of the reasoner should be used rather for the sifting of the details than for the acquiring of fresh evidence.

” This intimates that the mystery will be solved purely by the exercise of deduction rather than by finding the missing piece of the jigsaw. Also during the scene on the train Holmes gives us a display of his incredible dedutive powers and great intellect, thus hinting that this mystery will indeed be solved by powers of deduction alone. “Our rate at present is fifty three and a half miles an hour. ” “I have not observed the quarter-mile posts,” said I.

“Nor have I but the telegraph posts upon this line are sixty yards apart, and the calculation is a simple one. The main clues that add up to the final conclusion at the end of the story seem to be almost completely irrelevant at the time but when put together by Holmes they become very obvious. One of the mysteries that is uncovered is how the horse was stolen and aother is why the stable boy guarding the horse didn’t taste the drug in his food and also who drugged the food.

Holmes pieces together these clues and comes up with the theory that it could only be Mr or Mrs Straker who could have drugged the food, as a supper was ordered that would disguise the taste of the opium it was laced with and this could only have been done by either Mr or Mrs Straker. Another clue that may have seemed unimportant to others was why the stable dog did not bark when the horse was led away? The simple answer was that the dog must have recognised the intruder again pointing to Mr Straker. Another vital clue was the weapon that Straker had chosen to equip himself with when he left the house in the night.

He had mysteriously chosen a delicate surgery knife which was of no use as a weapon and could only be used for delicate operations. That combined with the method of Straker’s death strengthened Holmes’ thoery that Straker had led the horse out himself and was going to perform some kind of operation on it. Probably the most discrete clue of all was that of how Straker had practised with such a delicate tool as the knife to perform whatever his operation on the horse was. The answer was the sheep that the Strakers kept.

Straker had been practising his surgery on his sheep and had made them lame which proved that Straker was trying to sabotage his horse’s chance in the up-coming races. Holmes had then already set about theorising a method of why Straker would want to harm his horse. He then asked Mrs. Straker if he had seen her at a garden party a few months ago. She replied that she had not been present there. One of the items found on Strakers body was a bill for a dress made out to a Mr. Darbyshire. In truth John Straker had been leading a double life as Mr.

Darbyshire and had run up considerable debts by buying elabourate dresses for his mistress. Another feat of deduction was that of where the horse had disappeared to. Holmes deduced this by following the tracks and carefuly noting how there were just horse tracks and then suddenly a man’s footprints appeared next to the horse tracks. This indicated to Holmes that the horse must have been wandering and then found by someone. Holmes and Watson then followed the tracks to the Capleton stables where he engaged in a private conversation with the owner.

After all Holmes’ theorising he told the owner of the horse,Colonel Ross that he should leave Silver Blaze’s name down for the race to take place in a few days time. At the start of the race Holmes revealed Silver Blazes’ presence at the stables by showing that the horse had been painted a different colour to disguise its distinct colouring. I belive that this is one of Sherlock Holmes’ greatest displays of his intellect and deductive powers because of how he connects all the pieces of the puzzle that were all ready in existence simply by applying his very considerable powers of reasoning and logic.