The Bucket List Essay

The Bucket List Essay.

“The Bucket List” is a movie about Edward Cole, a wealthy man, and Carter Chambers, a poor mechanic. They are totally opposite of each other, but when they both appear in hospital beds, they become friends. Both of them decide to travel around the world and see what is going around them. While they travel, they talk about their daily lives and business, at home. Then Carter suddenly remembers his wife, Virginia and leaves back to his hometown. Carter and Edward are different and similar in many ways.

Also, identifying literary devices/elements is really important, because it makes everything more lucid, more specific and bold. Carter and Edward have lots of similarities. While they lay in hospital beds, they both decide to see the world. They both like traveling and both plan the bucket list before they “kick the bucket.”

Another similarity is that they both have similar illnesses, which is cancer. After both of these two men’s death, they are burned into ashes and are buried on the summit of Mt.

Everest. Even though they have some similarities, they also have a lot of differences. There are a lot of differences between Carter Chambers and Edward Cole. Edward is a wealthy, proud millionaire, but Carter, the mechanic, is a smart and helpful person. One other difference is that Carter has a family, wife and kids, but Edward was married and divorced four times and does not have a family, but only one daughter, that is not in peace with him.

While being in the hospital, Carter’s wife, Virginia, and his daughter visit Carter, but Edward is lonely and the only visitor he gets is “Tommy”-his personal assistant. When both men were very ill and almost ending their lives, Carter died first, and after him went Edward. These men were friends for only about two months and they both got to know each other, and Carter was the one that made Edward’s life more smooth and peaceful. Some of the literary devices/elements that are used in this movie are very important to identify. A metaphor is a direct comparison of two unlike things using the verb “to be”. In this movie, this literary device is referred to Edward, when he is talking to Carter and he says, “We’re both in the same boat.”

He means that they are on the same level of their lives and their illness. Another element would be a simile. It is the comparison of two unlike things using the words like or as. “The sound of a mountain was like a voice of god.” In addition, hyperboles are used a lot in this movie. A hyperbole is exaggeration or overstatement. “You’re going to be dead in five minutes” is a good example of a hyperbole. A pun is another example that is provided for us in the movie. A pun is usually a humorous use of a word in such a way as to suggest two or more of its meaning. Edward uses a pun saying “You look like shit, right”. In this movie, I was able to identify lots of literary devices/elements that helped me remember the movie more lucid and explicit.

The movie “The Bucket List” is a story about two men, Carter Chambers and Edward Cole that were totally opposite of each other. Carter was an open-hearted, nice, and a helpful mechanic, while Edward was a more proud, rich millionaire. Once they meet on their hospital beds, they become friends and decide to see the world together. In these two men, you could see a lot of their differences and similarities. Both of these men, after their death, are burned into ashes and are buried on top of Mt. Everest., even though it was against the law. Also literary devices/elements are very important to identify. They make the whole movie interesting and understandable.

You may also be interested in the following: buck in the snow, bucket list essay, the buck in the snow

The Bucket List Essay

Cake vs. Pie Essay

Cake vs. Pie Essay.

There are two different types of people in the dessert world, the pie people and the cake people. These two desserts are both wonder in my world but there are lots of differences in these two similar after dinner treats.

Pies are warm, baked, with a gooey filling of your choice. They have a hard crust that is holding in all the fresh ingredients. Cakes on the other hand are usually room temperature or cool because if they were hot they icing would melt off.

They usually are just in plain vanilla or chocolate but have other flavors. They aren’t gooey or very messy but moist and soft.

Most people think of pie as the all American dessert. When you think of baseball and moms, a pie goes right along with it. The cake is known for celebrations though. When you have a birthday or a graduation party, you don’t have pie, you have a birthday or graduation cake.

Also, you don’t blow the candles out on a pie for your birthday. But the fall back to cake is that is a celebratory tradition. When you go to a diner you can get a slice of pie but rarely a piece of cake. Cake is saved for those special occasions such as weddings.

These desserts are common in some ways such as they both go great with ice cream and a glass of milk, they are both very sweet and tasty, and they both can either be home-made or store bought. They are also both pretty easy to make if you don’t buy them at a store and come in a variety of different recipes.

Cakes and pies are two similar desserts with two very different kinds of people who prefer one or the other. Which one do you personally prefer?

Cake vs. Pie Essay

Compare and contrast the writing styles Essay

Compare and contrast the writing styles Essay.

Writers are characterized by three factors. These factors are style, tone, and purpose. William Byrd and William Bradford were two colonial writers however they took completely opposite approaches toward writing. During these times, journals, diaries, and sermons made up the literature. Byrd and Bradford were no exceptions with their works of A History of the Dividing Line and Of Plymouth Plantation respectively. Whether it was the difference in writing styles, the different purposes for writing the stories, or simply each writer’s tone, their techniques were far from similar to one another.

One difference between Bradford and Byrd was their writing styles. Bradford used the plain style to record and to describe his account of the New World. Plain style writing is the form of writing used by the Puritans. This writing style tended to stay away from figures of speech and tried to keep it plain, simple and right to the point. A great example is when the settlers first arrived and Bradford noted that the people “had now no friends to welcome them nor inns to entertain or refresh their weather-beaten bodies; no houses or much less towns to repair to, to seek for succor” (31).

This statement explained how difficult it was to arrive to such a barren land even after all the hardships assail. Bradford did an excellent job in his writings to give the real and accurate accounts of what happened.

On the other hand, Byrd wrote his perception of the New World in sharp contrast to the writing style of Bradford. Byrd used forms of ridicule to record his account of what took place in the new colonies. A classic example of this technique was when Byrd called the sudden immigration of people to the New World a “modish frenzy” (50). This statement shows that Byrd thought it to be just a modern fad to start a life in the New World. Byrd wrote using his own perception of colonial life and struggle, therefore making it less historically accurate than Bradford’s writings. These two styles characterized each man and greatly attributed to the huge contrast in their writing preference.

One of the three factors that characterized both writers was purpose. A large contrast in the writings of Byrd and Bradford was the purpose for which they were written. The main reason that Bradford wrote his story was to inform the reader about the hardships and struggles of Puritan life in the New
World. He also wrote his story to show God’s hand in their experiences. Many Biblical references to God such as, “but they cried unto the Lord, and He heard their voice and looked on their adversity” (31), were used in his writing for this very reason. This as well as many other religious references showed how much of an impact religion had on the Puritans. Bradford wanted to convey this dependence on and impact of God and religion throughout his writings. Byrd’s writing was more biased and opinionated because he wrote it to amuse the reader.

Read Also: Topics for Compare and Contrast Essay

For example, all throughout his story he constantly made fun of settlers. He mentioned during the story that the settlers “built a church that cost no more than fifty pounds and a tavern that cost five hundred” (52). This little tidbit served no purpose other than to criticize the colonial settlers and had no historical significance whatsoever. He made fun of the settlers to explicate change in the settlers’ way of life. Bradford’s purpose greatly contrasted with that of Byrd.

The last contrast between Byrd and Bradford was their attitude or tone towards the subject they wrote about. In “Of Plymouth Plantation”, Bradford used a serious tone. His tone remained simple and unbiased throughout the story. The fact that he chose to use this tone is because Bradford was a very religious man that closely followed the Puritan way of life. Most of all, he wanted to record the true accounts of what took place without mixing personal thoughts or ideas with fact. On the other hand, Byrd used a very satirical and humorous tone. This satirical tone was conveyed throughout his entire story.

An excellent example of satirical writing was when Byrd explained how colonists were too lazy to plant their own crops, so instead they “were forced to take more pains to seek for wild fruits in the woods than they would have taken in tilling the ground” (52). This quote by Byrd clearly showed his frustration with the colonists very. Byrd’s tone differed from Bradford’s, because Byrd’s story was never meant to be an accurate historical account of colonial times. Byrd possessed different feelings toward matters that took place, and this dramatically changed his tone.

To conclude, writers are never the same. There are many different types of writers all across the world, from ancient to modern times. William Byrd and William Bradford were no exception to this. Their style, tone, and purpose totally changed the outcome of their writings which were based upon similiar incidents in history. People have their own views and beliefs of a certain situation, and more often than not, that view will be different from person to person as clearly shown in comparing Byrd to Bradford.

Compare and contrast the writing styles Essay

Grant And Lee: A Study In Contrasts Essay

Grant And Lee: A Study In Contrasts Essay.

In recent years, there has been enough thesis studying General Grant and General Lee in contrasts. No wonder, because they are some of the most iconic figures in the new history of the United States. Both became military under the pressure of family circumstances. Both were outstanding participants in the Civil war. But the memory of Ulysses Grant is passed on from generation to generation while tombstones to Robert Lee are now threatened with demolition. Let us turn to comparison and study in contrasts lives of Bruce Catton Grant and Robert Lee.

Ulysses C. Grant was born on April 27, 1822, in Point Pleasant, Ohio. Already at an early age, the young general was helping his father on the farm. After visiting a lot of private schools, his father decided that he should make a soldier career. Thanks to the petition of Congressman Thomas L. Hemmer, Grant was admitted to the military academy in West Point, New York. Grant obeyed his father’s wishes, not experiencing much enthusiasm for the servicemen.

In 1843, he received the patent of an officer and started serving in the 4th Infantry Regiment of the United States. By the time of war against Mexico (1846-48), comrades’ remarks about the excessive use of alcohol by Grant belong. After numerous warnings from his superiors, he resigned in the summer of 1854.

Although his wife’s family had slaves, he found as right thing to fight on the side of the union. Soon Grant for his success in the military field was appointed general of the brigade. After under his command the Confederates from Kentucky were forced out, Lincoln conferred on him the rank of Major-General. Grant was distinguished by logic, calculation, and perseverance in conducting military operations, and his troops showed a high fighting morale. After the Civil War, Grant retained the main command of the US Army. In 1866, Congress conferred on him the rank of general.

It was the war that gave Grant his place in life. Being a War Minister, he has accumulated extensive management experience, although he was repeatedly reproached for incompetence required for the highest state office. In the presidency, general saw an opportunity to maintain a war victory by restoring the political unity of the state and guaranteeing civil rights.

Grant won elections in 1868 thanks to the program that promised reconstruction of the South, suffrage for liberated slaves and economic recovery of the southern states. But general in choosing ministers and advisers relied chiefly on the persons he knew the height of service. Promising much, Grant, however, was satisfied with the small. During his second term, no measures were taken to resolve social and political problems between races, so conservative forces in the South gained the upper hand. Also, a general refused his initial striving to reform the cabinet of officials, has managed to provide posts only to his closest friends.

The extent of corruption and bribery cases surpassed all previously known. Criticism against Grant grew. The most lasting influence was “panic of 1873” when banks were closed, and the timid efforts of the ministry could not improve sad situation. Mismanagement, embezzlement and large speculation accelerated economic downturn. After the end of the presidential term, Grant departed from politics. The hero of the Civil War died on July 23, 1885, in New York.

Despite military successes, in the history of the US, General Grant refers to weak presidents. He was considered as a passive politician who followed the directions of Congress, instead of implementing his own ideas. Venality represents his government in an unfavorable light.

His policy towards the southern states is often assessed as half-hearted, as Grant nevertheless tried to protect the civil rights of the black population. One gets an impression that he perceived his presidency as a kind of vestibule to political rest. In combination with naiveté, such attitude created a danger of manipulation. Therefore, a general didn’t justify the hopes that were placed on him.

Robert Edward Lee was born in 1807, in Stradford, Virginia. As his father soon had serious financial problems, in fact, mother raised the future general. If Grant’s fate was determined by his father, then Robert Lee’s life path was connected with economic difficulties. The only way out in similar situation was to enter the famous military academy West Point.

Robert Lee, who was not only diligence in his studies but also a great physical force, could become an ideal officer in the American army. And he became it. While studying at the academy, Lee was one of the best Cadets, not having received a single penalty from a higher command. After finishing he was assigned to engineering troops.

But the career of a war engineer did not give the desired advancement in titles. In addition, service in the outback was burdened by an officer who could not fully engage in his family. In the end, Robert managed to achieve transfer to cavalry. By this time he was already 48 years old. In 1861, Abraham Lincoln invited Colonel Lee to lead the land forces of federal government, as conditions in the Southern States heated up to the limit. Herewith, Robert was regarded as a convinced opponent of slavery. However, being a native of the South, a colonel wrote a petition for resignation, stressing that he was not able to participate in the invasion of his homeland.

The general, who is seen as a symbol of militant slave-owners, for many years kept a large family for modest state salaries, and acquired slaves, only obtaining an inheritance at the age of 50 years. While the commander of the army of the North, General Ulysses Grant was a slaveholder. His “laborers” were freed only after the amendment to the Constitution abolishing slavery came into force in 1865.

Colonel Lee turned to Jefferson Davis, the president of the Confederation, and offered him his services as a soldier. So, Robert rose to the general’s epaulets, engaged in the creation of a regular army of the southern states. Lee participated in the planning of numerous military operations and then headed the Army of Northern Virginia.

Commanded by general, the troops achieved impressive success. Yielding to the northerners in the strength and preparedness, Lee defeated them after defeat. His name has turned into a nightmare for his enemies. Robert Lee enjoyed great respect from the opponents. In particular, Ulysses Grant called him “Ace Peak”. But in 1865 Lee’s army was forced to capitulate.

The federal government amnestied Robert Lee. He died in 1870, until the end of his life engaged in the organization of assistance to former soldiers of the Confederation. For a long time, merits of General Lee were recognized by a lot of US patriots, regardless of political beliefs. The situation began to change not so long ago when in America there was a “left-liberal” coup, expressed on a symbolic level in a rigid refusal of memory of all representatives of the Confederation.

Thus, as we can see, General Grant and General Lee study in contrasts summary show that they were in the best light only in the military field. Of course, Ulysses proved to be luckier than Robert. But, as we know, the truth is always on the side of the winners. Lee’s reluctance to fight against the southern states testifies to his high moral qualities. After all, he did not advocate the extension of slavery, but for the independence of the South. Whereas Grant refers to the type of people who try to transfer their successes from one sphere to another, without sufficient knowledge and skills. In this regard, General Lee is more honest, because he was engaged in one thing, not pretending to be a connoisseur of politics.


You may also be interested in the following: grant and lee a study in contrasts

Grant And Lee: A Study In Contrasts Essay