Situational Irony Essay

Situational Irony Essay.

Many times authors use irony to prove a point. There are three types of irony: dramatic, verbal, and situational. Situational irony is present in “The Sniper”, “The Most Dangerous Game”, “Gift of the Magi”, and “The Necklace” to help create the theme in the stories. In the story The Sniper situational irony plays a major part in the story.”The lust of battle died in him. He became bitten by remorse” (O’Flanerty). This shows situational irony because he was ready to kill, but when the sniper killed his enemy, he felt awful for what he had done.

“The sniper turned over the dead body and looked into his brothers face” (O’Flanerty). This statement showed situational irony because the author was trying to make a point that killing someone is like killing your own brother. Situational Irony is also present in The Most Dangerous Games.

An example is when Whitney and Rainsford are talking about if the hunted have feelings.

Later in the story Rainsford finds out what it is like to be hunted (Connel 216). This showed irony because what Whitney and Rainsford came true. The irony also helps support the theme of treat others the way you want to be treated. “One of us is to furnish a repast for the hounds. The other will sleep in this very excellent bed. He had never slept in a better bed Rainsford decided” (Connel 225). The situational irony in this quote is that General Zaroff was fed to his hounds that he sent to go kill Rainsford. In The Gift of the Magi there are some strong examples of situational irony. “I sold my watch to get the money for your combs”(Henry 251). “And now, they were hers, but the tresses that should have adorned the courted adornments were gone” (Henry 251).

These quotes showed situational irony because Della sold her hair and got hair combs. Also Jim sold his watch but got a chain for his watch as his present (Henry 251). This quote helps the author create the theme because it tells you that the greatest gift is giving. The quote showed the theme because both Jima and Della gave away something treasured to them to get something for someone they love.` In “The Necklace”, there is situational irony when Mathide worked ten years to pay off a real diamond necklace that she used to replace a fake necklace (De Maupassant 301). The situational irony helped prove the theme of don’t let your pride get in your way. “Oh my poor Mathide! But mine was an imitation.

It was worth at the very most five hundred frances” ( De Maupassant 301). The situational irony in these quotes is that Mathide has worked for ten very hard years to pay for a real diamond necklace. She only did this because she didn’t want to tell the truth because she didn’t want to have a lower social status. This relates to the irony because by paying off the necklace she lowered her social status by herself. In all four stories there were examples of situational irony. The irony helped prove the author’s point and help create the theme. The irony takes everyday events and twists the plot of the story. Situational irony is a commonly use literature device and it is used in these four stories.

You may also be interested in the following: situational writing examples

Situational Irony Essay

Satire Project Essay

Satire Project Essay.

Article:

1. The topic of this article is Lance Armstrong, who recently admitted to doping throughout his cycling career. The article is written based off of an actual interview on Lance conducted by Oprah Winfrey. In this interview, Armstrong admits to fraud and taking performance enhancing drugs in preparation for races. 2. This article’s main claim is that Lance Armstrong is completely guilty of the crime. It is more informative; explaining the real situation and presenting quotes from Armstrong himself. 3. I would cite this article as shown below:

Litke, Jim. “Lance Armstrong Interview: Cyclist Confesses Doping To Oprah.” Huffington Post. 17 01 2013: n. < http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/17/lance-armstrong-interview-doping-oprah_n_2500456.html?utm_hp_ref=mostpopular,lance-armstrong>

Cartoon:

1. The event that inspired my cartoon is professional cyclist, or rather unprofessional, Lance Armstrong, admitting to doping. Armstrong’s use of steroids and performance enhancing drugs over the years of his cycling career caused him to be stripped of 7 Tour de France titles and many other awards.

This event was even more controversial because of the cancer charity, Livestrong, that he created. 2. The target of my satirical political cartoon is Lance Armstrong. In particular, I am targeting the bad choices that he has made throughout his career. It is because of this that my intended audience would be anyone who thinks that what Armstrong did wasn’t right.

3. My satirical critique is that Lance Armstrong should not have used performance enhancing drugs. It was completely unfair to the people that participated in all of the races with him. It was also awful of him to lie about it for so long especially because so many people, all over the world, saw him as an inspiration and even donated to his cancer charity. 4. My purpose in making this cartoon is to criticize Lance Armstrong. I am criticizing the fact that he lied and used steroids and performance enhancing drugs during his cycling career. 5. The response I mainly want from my audience is go get them to see that what Armstrong did was ridiculous and unfair. It is just so hard to believe that someone could go on this long, lying to the world and ruining other cyclists’ dreams of winning a race in which they got nothing and he got all of the glory.

6. I incorporated the political cartoon technique of irony by drawing an I.V. pole being dragged by Lance Armstrong who is on a bike. This is ironic because he might as well have been doing that since he was doping in preparation for big races. I also used the technique of labeling to make it clear to the audience that the bags hooked up the I.V. pole were filled with performance enhancing drugs and blood, then being fed into Lance’s arm. 7. I would place my cartoon closer to the juvenalian side of the satire continuum. It belongs closer to this side because it is sarcastic and harshly ridiculing Lance Armstrong.

Satire Project Essay

Big Brother Isn’t Watching You Essay

Big Brother Isn’t Watching You Essay.

Conflict is unavoidable wherever there are humans. But what causes these conflicts and how should these be resolved? These questions are addressed in a commentary by Russell Brand called ”Big Brother isn’t watching you”. He comments on the riots of London in 2011 and tries to explain why they happened as well as how to resolve this conflict between the government and the younger generations. Russell Brand moved to Los Angeles but still considers himself an Englishman which contributes highly to his decision to write this commentary.

He starts out by telling an analogy, of sorts. He describes his days on the show Big Brother where a rather significant incident happened. During the show, 3 of the persons living in the house, incited by the teasing conditions, got in a fight, and the police were called upon at once.

The producer asked Brand not to recount the extent of the violence, on air, to which he answered: “You cannot rouse the animal in man then expect it to be put aside at a moment’s notice.

” (P.2,L.19-20). This is also the main issue in the next thing he addresses, which is the main focus in the text, the London riots in 2011. Brand finds the riots troubling and frightening but questions: why are they happening? He doesn’t agree with the rioters, but instead of dwelling on the riots themselves he wants to find the reason behind the riots. This is shown in the following quote: “However “unacceptable” and “unjustifiable” it might be, It has happened so we better accept it and, whilst we can’t justify it, we should kick around a few neurons and work out why so many people feel utterly disconnected from the cities they live in.”(P.3,L.55-57)

Here he presents a new problem: the feeling of being disconnected from society. Brand tells a story from his youth where he, as so many others participating in the London riots, felt a void inside him. He felt a lack of direction and felt that the government only represented the big business instead of the general population. In his case he had a loving mother and father who helped him, and he says that “I shudder to think how disenfranchised I would have felt if I had been deprived of that long list of privileges.” (P.3,L.80-81). Many of the rioters came from poor families, had no education, no money and no chance to get their hands on any. They are in other words young people on the margins of society. In 2006 Cameron held a speech where he argued for a better understanding of these young people on the margins of society. But what does he gain from that. Many of these don’t even vote because they feel disenfranchised and because they know that whoever sits on the power will treat them the same. This can be seen from the following quote: “Hoodies don’t vote, they’ve realized it’s pointless, that whoever gets elected will just be a different shade of the “we don’t give a toss about you” party”(P.3,L.92-93). He states that the young people have no sense of community because they were never given one. Neither Cameron nor Thatcher has managed to embrace the margins of society.

He says: “If we don’t want our young people to tear apart our communities then don’t let people in power tear apart the values that hold our community together.”(P.4,L.105-106) This is a very critical statement that openly attacks the UK government and demands a change that will have an effect on the young people who acted in the 2011 riots. Russell Brand, true to his profession, writes in a very sarcastic and, at times, humorous language. One of the first examples of sarcasm or humorous writing in the text is the following quote: “… dopey ol’ Boris came cycling back into the London clutter with his spun gold hair and his spun shit logic as it became apparent that the holidays were over.”(P.2,L.27-29) This quote contains heavy sarcasm in the way he describes the mayor of London, Boris Johnson, and the way he handled the crisis. Another example of sarcasm and maybe the best one in the text is in the following quote: “Wow! Thanks guys! What a wonderful use of the planet’s fast-depleting oxygen resources.” (P.2,L.51-52)

This sentence is directed at the so-called experts who called the 2011 riots “unacceptable” as well as “unjustifiable”. In this case Brand uses sarcasm to show his opinion the matter. The quote can easily be interpreted as his attitude towards the experts who, according to him, are using unnecessary oxygen to state the obvious instead of figuring out, what caused the riots. This is not the only place he clearly expresses his attitude towards the riots or the way they’ve been handled by the government. He mentions numerous times that he cannot agree to call the rioters mindless, but on the other hand he clearly states that he does not consent with what the rioters did. The solution to the problem is, in accordance to Brand, not political but spiritual. He quotes Gandhi: “Be the change you want to see in the world.” (P.4,L.12-13)

He includes this quote to show that the rioters only acted to be heard and in the hope that they’d be included in society. It is now the job of the communities to include the young people on the margins in society in the community and to show them compassion and love. Russell Brand believes the riots are caused by the lack of community felling. This is caused by the indifference shown by the government toward the young people who acted in the riots and who are often on the margins of society. He criticizes the futile terms used by the experts to describe the rioters, and urges the communities to take action and include the troubled young people in the communities, which would possibly avoid future confrontation.

Big Brother Isn’t Watching You Essay

Dramatic Irony to Build the Character of Macbeth Essay

Dramatic Irony to Build the Character of Macbeth Essay.

Macbeth, there’s a passage in which the King is speaking with Banquo and Macbeth. They are in the King’s palace, commenting about Macbeth becoming Thane of Cawdor. One of the literary resources that Shakespeare constantly uses is irony. In this case, he uses dramatic irony, in which the audience is aware of a situation that the other characters are not familiar with. In this specific circumstance, he uses the irony to build up the character of Macbeth, to let the audience judge him themselves.

There are various examples in which the dramatic irony is explicit. The King has high expectations of the deeds that Macbeth is going to fulfill. He trusts Macbeth and he has just been assigned to be Thane of Cawdor. “He was a gentleman on whom I built an absolute trust”. The King is referring to the former Thane of Cawdor who betrayed him, he’s committing the same mistake twice, but he seems to be too naive, not considering the fact that maybe Macbeth can betray him too.

Macbeth is not planning on doing so yet, but he is being tempted to.

The audience knows that Macbeth has spoken to the three witches, that he has the idea of becoming king in his mind, the king doesn’t know this. Macbeth has been presented to us as a good person, not evil. He doesn’t seem to have any plans against the king, or against anybody, he seems to be honest and pacific. We think like this and so do the rest of the characters. The problem is that an obstacle has been placed in his way, he has been tempted, he is being manipulated into becoming greedy and ambitious.

Temptation is attacking his mind, one can clearly identify this in his aside, “let not light see my black and deep desires” . He is admitting to himself that he is feeling inducement to commit a crime in order to get to the crown. The situational irony here is present because of the fact that the king is saying wonderful comments about Macbeth and he is answering him with all respect and honor, but the audience hears his aside, proving him to be kind of a hypocrite. The image the spectators have of Macbeth is beginning to change. Macbeth praises the King in each and every one of his sentences.

He continues telling him how hard he is going to work for him, how much he honors him and what a pleasure it is to work directly for him. The viewers start to question the veracity of Macbeth’s statements. He seems to be trying to convince the King to trust him, when Macbeth doesn’t even trust himself because he is very confused. “The service and the loyalty I owe, / In doing it, pays itself. ” Macbeth seems to be honest when he speaks these words, but when we listen to his soliloquy we doubt this. This is what builds the situational irony again.

The dramatic irony is a tool for the audience to learn more about the character of Macbeth. The listeners used to think that Macbeth was impulsive, naive, and good hearted, after this scene, people start to question that. This aims to the theme of the play, “Fair is foul, and foul is fair” . There’s confusion between what’s right and what’s wrong. To this point, the spectators don’t know what to think about Macbeth, it is all summarized in what the king said, “There’s no art / To find the mind’s construction in the face. ” No matter what your image of somebody is, there’s a fifty/fifty chance that this is false.

Dramatic Irony to Build the Character of Macbeth Essay