Billions of people in the world have made eating of mean part of their lives. Millions of animals have been killed for the purpose of meat production. People who have reared livestock, among other purposes, have been keen to keep them as a source food. Meat has also been used when people want to mark important life events. Meat is an essential delicacy in the meals of billions of people does not make it an essential factor for the existence of human beings. They are just a source of food just like any other food. In fact, studies have found out that too much meat can have adverse, significant effects on the health of the human being. These consequences are not seen or felt immediately but appear with time. These research findings clearly indicate that a meat diet is not as healthy as most would think. This paper establishes the ethics of eating animals and some of the consequences of eating meat.
Doctors believe that a meatless diet could be healthier than a diet containing meat. Researches have conducted to establish the contents of the food products. The research findings have indicated that indeed meat contains fatter than non-meat foods. The body of the human being has not been designed to process high quantities of fat in the meat, which will accumulate and eventually leads to some unhealthy body conditions. This paper sees to establish the ethics of eating animals and some of the consequences associated with eating meat.
While a human being has all along considered eating meat as “Natural,” however, Pollan believes that human being mistreats an animal. Some animals such as cats and dogs are treated. Differently, they are regarded as pets, treated with love and attention. They are not considered a source of meat or food but a source of companionship to the human being. Other animals such as pigs and cows are brutalized in a slaughterhouse. Pollan is not only talking about meat eating but how the source of that meat is treated. According to Pollan, such cultural schizophrenia way of treating animals would take place in a culture where people have less meaningful contact with the animals that will become their food. People would interact more with their pets more they would do with animals such as pigs or cows.
Pollan is opposing the use of animal’s meat on the basis of the relationship between these animals and the human being. Apart from the fact that animal meat has some adverse effect on our health, Pollan seems to have the notion that this animal ought to be accorded fair treatment. This forms the notion behind moral Dilemma regarding the use of meat as food. In the omnivore’s dilemma, Pollan believes that there is a lack of a stable culture of food to guide people. It, therefore, leaves people with no clear direction or guideline when it comes to the use of meat. This lack of guideline is the reason why people have not been able to control how much or less they can take meat. From the notion by Pollan, there is all indication that meat is not bad, but how people treat the whole issue. Hence a remarkably unwholesome population gripped with eating healthily—it’s the American Absurdity.
Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount.
The abortion dilemma is one of the most sensitive and contentious issues in the moral, political, religious and cultural frameworks (West, 1999). The debate has dates has a very long history, and to-date, is still heavily debated across the globe; both in legality and morality terms. Some of the never ending questions include: Are there any legal and/or moral rights for the foetus? Is the justification of abortion morally? Is the foetus a human being, and therefore, need protection? What does it take to be a human being?
This debate is dominated by two camps with opposing views concerning abortion. They include the pro-life activists and the pro-choice with extreme conservative and extreme liberal views on abortion, respectively. The pro-life activists believe that the development of a unicellular zygote marks the beginning of a personhood of a human being. Therefore, as per the religion stand, abortion should remain illegal by virtue of the “imago dei” of human being; otherwise, it would be a homicide. On the other hand, the pro-choice activists through McDonagh argue abortion is a right for women so as to defend themselves “against the non-consensual invasion, appropriation, and use of her physical body by an unwelcomed foetus” (West, 1999).
The pro-life activists seem advantaged by defining human personhood from the very start of life. However, it may sound insane to refer a zygote as a human being. The abortionists view maybe also right because their major claim is reinforced by a popular philosophical usage of concept “personhood.” Yes, the offspring is more developed than the unicellular zygote. However, this does not imply that the pro-choice definition faces no hurdles. There is no morally relevant difference between a just-born baby and a foetus ten minutes prior to birth. This article will attempt to analyse the controversy surrounding abortion in utilitarian terms, and then contrast utilitarian against deontologists view on abortion (Ngwenya, 2013).
The utilitarianism can be an efficient way of handling the abortion controversy in the current world. Utilitarian believe thathumans’ major aim is to achieve the greatest possible pleasure. Utility evades the aforementioned problems since it does not share the hypotheses. Utilitarianism argues that the abortion rights should be measured by their usefulness to the society. Therefore, this article presents analysis based on the pain and pleasure amount in cases where abortion is legal and illegal.
Many individuals would expect the argument to centre on foetus’ interest since it may be destined for a happy future life, and also abortion itself is agonizing, especially if carried-out in late-stages of the pregnancy. However, these are shoddy considerations because: any pain that can arise in the process of abortion can be prevented through a timely abortion or the use of painless approaches. Hence, the overall pain experienced by the foetus cannot offer a solid reason against abortion; only the ugly exercise of it. If one assumes the foetus’ future life comprises of a feasible balance of happiness over pain, then a crucial consideration arises against abortion (Ngwenya, 2013).
Secondly, this paper considers parents and family members if adoption exists as an alternative to abortion. Some researchers claim that having a baby, even in instances where pregnancy is intentional, might reduce the happiness in a relationship. Once again, this claim is insignificant; hence, no need to consider it. According to utilitarian theory, the wrongness or rightness of abortion do not depend either on the effects of abortion on the agent or the victims but lies on the less direct consequences of the overall society. The abortion controversy, assuming the existence “rights” and guilty conscience of “baby murders,” becomes desirability of either decreasing or increasing population (Utilitarian.org, 2000).
If there is a population size that is below the optimal number, it is obvious that the utility will advocates for new birth above this number. In this instance, utility provides positive duties. If the utilitarian agree that the baby’s future happiness, coupled with a calculated value of the consequences on others is in such way that utility opposes abortion, directly s/he implies that utility advocates for population increase. In utility terms, the authentic act of abortion is not a principally important one (Utilitarian.org, 2000).
In this analysis, the dominant issue is the comparative consequences on the overall society. First, nurturing a child in a contemporary developed country is very expensive in monetary terms. Secondly, the world faces an increasing pressure on the environment and other terrible inequalities; and hence people should not focus on the growing population (Poglitsh, 2012).
In case a utilitarian finds out that she is unexpectedly pregnant, then she has to abort because the utility opposes her reproduction. While if the utility is in favour of her pregnancy, means that should have been attempting to get pregnant; hence, it should not be a surprise (Utilitarian.org, 2000).
Deontology theory, on the other hand, claims that every human being has certain duties. While utilitarian is much concerned with the consequences, deontology focuses on ethical truths and norms that are universally acceptable by everyone. In other words, certain actions are immoral irrespective of their consequences. Consider, for example, a pregnant lady who in the course of her pregnancy develops health complications and the only way-out is either to abort, or she dies. Automatically, a utilitarian will advise the lady to abortion since it produces the highest happiness; however, a deontologist will advise her not to have an abortion because murdering an innocent foetus is wrong as per the universal moral truth.
According to utilitarian, existence of a “universal moral truth” is not logic: it is difficult, if not impossible, to establish. To them, the happiness and suffering of any doings are easily determined. Hence, people should stop basing on such unstructured and ambiguous moral truth, and instead embrace more concrete ways of ascertaining ethics of a given action (Physicsisphirst, 2004).
On the other hand, Deontologists view outcomes as illusory i.e. it is impossible foretell the consequences of an individual’s acts with total certainty. The only way for assurance is for one to gauge whether his/her actions are ethical or do not base on the categorical imperative. Deontologists also believe that each human being is individually responsible for his/her own actions and not actions of others. Therefore, the pregnant lady is responsible to either her decision to have an abortion or not. Lastly, deontologists accuse the utilitarian of entrusting perilous moral relativisms by allowing individuals to validate dreadful deeds in the name that its effects are beneficial (Physicsisphirst, 2004).
In conclusion, for one to think that the wrongness or the rightness of abortion is an issue that can be ascertained by considering the consequences on the parties, i.e. parents, foetus and doctors, who get directly involved in the action can be such a precarious short-sighted and naïve move.
Reference
Ngwenya, Z. (2013). Abortion is Intrinsically Evil. Times of Swaziland, November, 9. Retrieved from http://www.times.co.sz/letters/93067-abortion-is-intrinsically-evil.html.
Physicsisphirst. (2004). Utilitarianism vs. Deontology. Physics forum, March, 3. Retrieved from http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=15622.
Poglitsh, R. (2012).Letters to the Times of Swaziland. Times of Swaziland, November, 25. Retrieved from http://letterstothetos.blogspot.com/.
Utilitarian.org. (2000). Abortion. Retrieved from http://www.utilitarian.org/abortion.html.
West, R. (1999). Liberalism and abortion. Georgetown Law Journal, 87(6), 2117-2147. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/231486885?accountid=87314.
Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount.
It needs to include 6-7 (full/double-spaced) pages of actual content, a title, and a reference page are an addition to the actual content. In sum, you need to submit 8-9 pages total. With regard to what I am looking for; I am looking for a short summary of the book at the beginning of your paper, what stood out to you, what resonated, and why… and any lingering questions that you might have with respect to Pollans work.
“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”
The post a Book Review of Michael Pollan’s “Omnivore’s Dilemma.” first appeared on nursing writers.
Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount.
Week 5 Topic 5 DQ1 The theoretical foundations of qualitative and quantitative methods are very different, but many researchers believe both methods should be used in the research study to increase validity and reliability. What advantages or disadvantages do you see in using both types of methods in a nursing study? Support your answer with current evidence-based literature. Topic 5 DQ2 Nursing research is used to study a dilemma or a problem in nursing. Examine a problem you have seen in nursing. Why should it be studied? Justify your rationale.
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount.
Ethics is the study of practical reasoning. Nurses face ethical dilemmas on a daily basis. Ethical behavior is determined by many factors. The purpose of this assignment is to explore the impact of ethical dilemmas on nursing and the ANA Code of Ethic guidelines in dealing with those issues.
Instructions for the assignment:
Write a 1-2-page paper using APA format on the following: -Describe an ethical dilemma in nursing. -Find a peer-reviewed article that addresses the impact that it has on nursing. Include a link or copy of the article with your submission. -Apply the ANA Code of Ethics to this dilemma. • If faced with this dilemma, how would you approach this issue?
Sample Solution
The post Ethical dilemma in nursing appeared first on nursing writers.
“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”
The post Ethical dilemma in nursing first appeared on nursing writers.
Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount.
Nursing research is used to study a dilemma or a problem in nursing. Examine a problem you have seen in nursing. Provide an overview of the problem and discuss why the problem should be studied. Provide rational and support for your answer.
Sample Solution
The post Nursing research is used to study a dilemma or a problem in nursing appeared first on nursing writers.
“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”
The post Nursing research is used to study a dilemma or a problem in nursing first appeared on nursing writers.
Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount.
Identify a major ethical dilemma in nursing facing the profession of nursing and succinctly analyze and discuss the issue using supporting professional documentation using scholarly nursing research and evidenced-based practice information. • The position presentation proposes a thesis statement.
The presentation addresses the following:
• Describes and analyzes the ethical issue using either the Utilitarian or the Deontological approach. • Takes a pro or con view of the issue and provides the argument in support of your view. • How might strategies be used to prevent or to minimize conflict? What strategies might be applied if conflict does arise? • The ethical dilemma in nursing considered important in today’s health care organization. • How might ethical dilemma in nursing alter your way of caring for patients in nursing?
Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount.
Nursing Ethics and Creating an Ethical Dilemma Using the reading and the questionnaire, write a paper of 750-1,000 words in which you describe your professional moral compass. As you write your paper, include the following: 1. What personal, cultural, and spiritual values contribute to your worldview and philosophy of nursing? How do these values shape or influence your nursing practice? 2. Define values, morals, and ethics in the context of your obligation to nursing practice. Explain how your personal values, philosophy, and worldview may conflict with your obligation to practice, creating an ethical dilemma. 3. Reflect and share your own personal thoughts regarding the morals and ethical dilemmas you may face in the health care field. How do your personal views affect your behavior and your decision making? Do not be concerned with the use of ethical terminology for this paper. Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount.
pediatric ethics committees to assist the patient and healthcare professionals in making informed decisions regarding dilemma in pediatrics.
Using APA, write about 3 page paper on pediatric ethical dilemma. The pediatric ethical dilemma can be from a clinical experience or an article/story from the new. Example topics related to genetics/genomics issues include, but are not limited to: genetic testing, diagnosis of a genetic disorder, genetic counseling (or lack thereof), pharmacogenomics, lifelong surveillance, and recruiting individuals for genetics research.
Pediatric Ethical Dilemma in Pediatric Nursing
Ethical dilemmas in nursing are some of the most challenging occurrences, as they involve a conflict between personal preservation and professional accountability. In pediatric nursing, ethical dilemmas offer unique challenges, as they involve minors and third parties, normally the parent or guardian of the child. Ethical dilemma in pediatrics arises mainly because the minor cannot make independent decision pertaining to treatment, a responsibility that is legally accorded to the guardian. Additionally, medical situations such as separation of conjoined twins have considerable ethical implications.
An ethical dilemma I once read involved separation of conjoined twins in Massachusetts General Hospital in 2017. The conjoined twins aged 22 months and both girls had originated from Africa and were sharing several major organs, including liver and bladder (Malone, 2017). They were joined at the pelvis and abdomen. Surgical assessment in the hospital indicated that the separation process could only save the life one of them. However, failure to undertake the surgical separation would result to both of them dying. In this case, the surgical team had to make a decision on which of the two to spare. Eventually, the surgical operation was conducted and as expected, one of the twins died. The other survived and is reportedly to be doing well (Malone, 2017). In the scenario, various individuals were involved, including the parents of the conjoined twins, the multidisciplinary team of health experts involved in the process of surgical separation and the hospital’s ethical team. The parents were the custodians and primary carers of the twins. The multidisciplinary team which included nurses, specialist surgeons and anesthetists were involved in providing relevant interventions to the twins, before, during and after the surgical operation. The role of the hospital’s ethical committee was to assist the parents and healthcare professionals involved in the surgery make informed decision, by providing relevant information concerning the possible risks, and benefits of undertaking/failure to undertake the operation.
Various ethical principles relate to the scenario presented. These include the principles of autonomy, nonmaleficence and beneficence (ANA, 2009). The principle of autonomy grants individual patients with the right to take part and make decisions in a medical process (Hester, 2008). Since they conjoined twins are minors, they could not provide a truly informed consent, and the parents had to make decisions on their behalf. The principle of nonmaleficence obligates healthcare professionals to do no harm (ANA, 2009). In the scenario, the surgical separation involved harming one conjoined twin but survival of the other. In this case, deciding to harm one twin for the benefit of the other was challenging. The principle of beneficence is based on promoting the goodness in others by refraining from doing harm (Fallat, & Glover, 2007). In the scenario provided, undertaking the surgery was aimed promoting the goodness or wellbeing of the twins, because, failure to undertake the procedure would ultimately result to death of both.
During the time of care, it became apparent that separation of the twins through surgical operation was the only intervention that could promote health outcomes of one of them. Failure to separate them would result to both of them dying. However, each of the twins had equal right to life. And the parents had to make decisions on behalf of the twins. The surgical team had to consider the rights of the twins and the parents, and make decisions that would result to best possible outcome. Therefore, the hospital pediatric ethics committee took the initiative of informing parents about all possible outcomes that would come about from undertaking or failure to undertake the surgical separations of the twins. Eventually, the doctors went ahead with the surgery, in which the smaller and weaker of the twins died, but the other survived and recovered (Malone, 2017). To resolve the dilemma, the “standard of best interest”, whereby the healthcare professionals based their action on what they considered to be of best benefit to the twins was applied (Hester, 2008, p.8).
To resolve the situation, the main resource applied was pediatric ethics committees to assist the patient and healthcare professionals in making informed decisions regarding dilemma in pediatrics. However, the main role of pediatrics ethics committee is to provide all relevant information to the parties involved, including all the possible adverse and beneficial outcomes that would occur after taking or failing to take a particular action.
Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount.
Chosen Dilemma: Voluntary/Assisted Euthanasia Confronting Death: Who Chooses? Who Controls? A Dialogue between Dax Cowart and Robert Burthttp:digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/706/ The Terry Schiavo Documentary http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cki55BM42kw 1) Write a formal paper of 250-300 words identifying important components of the chosen dilemma include the following: Provide ethical theories and or ethical principles to substantiate your position. Rubric: Appropriately identifies own position on issue, drawing support from lecture content, experience, and information beyond assigned sources. Integrates ethical theory and/or principle to substantiate position. 2) Also, students will conduct an interview about the ethical dilemma with a health care colleague. In your interview, ask about the individual’s philosophy and worldview in relation to the ethical dilemma chosen for Part One of the Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma. Craft a 250-500 word summary of the individual’s response, including the individual’s identified philosophy and worldview. So two short papers and one interview.
Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount.
