The Effectiveness Of Central Line Associated Blood Stream Infection On The Reduction Of Central Line Infections

Abstract

The increased numbers of central line bloodstream infections cases are increasing as more people spend almost their life time at hospital ICU’s area. If a solution could be found about how to prevent such cases, more lives would be saved and the cost of healthcare practices would go down. The following research proposal aims at investigating how effective line bundle protocol is in preventing central line associated bloodstream infections in ICUs compared to the normal standard precautions. The research will make use of quantitative research methods through primary data collection tools like questionnaires, interviews, and surveys. In addition, the proposal gives the best theory that the research should adopt in determining the best nursing practice.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table of Contents

Abstract 2

Introduction. 3

Background. 4

Problem statement 5

Research objectives. 6

Nursing theoretical framework. 6

Hypothesis. 8

Literature review.. 8

Method. 10

Justification of the method. 11

Validity and reliability of data collection tools. 12

Limitations. 12

Data collection. 12

Questionnaires and interviews. 14

Data analysis. 14

References. 14

 

 

 

Introduction

Bloodstream infections caused by central line infections have a maturity rate of 12% to 25%, which makes them the most deadly infections in the world. Such patients are treated in Intensive Care units (ICUs) because they require thorough intervention and their lives are always in danger. Quality health is a right for every human being and not a privilege. The health services have offered in hospitals should concentration on preventing incidences such as central line bloodstream infections that are very dangerous in a patient’s life. As such, individuals should have a right to health preventive practices. The amount of Americans expenditure on CLABSI cases has an approximate value of 20% of the family budget. The spending results to high rate of poverty especially to people who leave below the poverty line, and citizens in developing countries. In addition, health care system in United States lacks the element of patient-doctor centric and it is quite uncoordinated.

Prevention is a key need for quality health; this ensures that individuals receive the service in an adequate manner and that the services are of high quality. Creating a room for the privilege in CLABSI cases may introduce an element of discrimination on the level of services that an individual receives. In using effective prevention measures such incidences would be reduced. According to Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (2012), best practices have been introduced regarding the practices of preventing the CLABSI infections and strategies for determining the best practices. Therefore, hospital ICUs being a right ensures that individuals receive an equal and standard level of services to avoid sudden deaths. In addition, prevention of CLABSI cases minimizes the amount of individual expenditure in hospital bills and saves the government a lot of revenue in catering for the bed ridden people (Shi & Singh, 2008).

CLABSI cases need effective facilities that prevent their occurrence; as such, the government should take an active role in the management of the infections that result to CLABSI. This involves educating of physicians and medical practitioners or better healthcare practices that prevents the spread of CLABSI to patients. The management at hospitals should safeguard the health of patients by ensuring physicians, doctors, and nurses use the appropriate tools while handling patients, especially during injection processes. According to Comprehensive unit-based Safety program (CUSP) and HAI (2011), hospitals should ensure they offer the best healthcare practices that minimize certain infections through adopting effective programs, which ensure the live of patients is not put at risk. The following research proposal will investigate on the suitability of using central line bundle protocol in prevention of central line associated bloodstream infections in hospitals ICU”s. the research will make use of quantitative research methods on gathering the necessary information that will be of importance for the proposal. In addition, the research will use the most effective nursing theory that guides it through justifying the use of the nursing technique proposed.    

Background

            The use of central venous catheters (CVCs) in the administration of intravenous fluids, medications, blood products, and parental nutrition together with the monitoring of various blood activities inside the body is a common practice in today’s healthcare centers.  Many venous and arteries are required in identifying pathophysiologic factors that help in determining the efficiency of any therapy in a healthcare centre. The use of such processes leads to serious bloodstream infections referred to central line-associated bloodstream infections. These infections are now highly preventable when proper guidelines are followed for the collect administration of the required medication and other substances. The type of infections developed by a patient when receiving certain care in a healthcare centre might cause many troubles if allowed to grow and expand to other parts of the body. Hospital ICU’s use either central line bundle protocol or no bundle protocol with standard precautions in preventing central line associated blood infections (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2005).

The establishment of line bundle protocol process will introduce an element of prevention, among the bloodstream infection cases. This will aid in motivating them and an algorithm that will aid health care cost reduction and improvement of the service delivery will emerge. This, in turn, will aid in improving the nation’s health care, and families will save their earnings on health care costs. In addition, the process will aid in solving societal problems of health care delivery system. The key challenge for the issue presented is the ability of different health care centers to adopt the process in the technology, and develop a system of making health care affordable and efficient.

Problem statement

`           Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection (CLABSI) is a serious health problem that affects more than 41,000 victims each year in United States. The infections cause prolonged hospital stay and are associated with increased mortality risks and health costs. Various healthcare centers use different methods of preventing cases of CLABSI, but research has not yet determined the best protocol to adopt. The high risks of blood stream infections results from poor practices that hospital use in preventing such infections. Blood stream infections increase the duration of hospitalization by almost 21 days leading to increased cost of medication. On the other hand, the more the infections the more death cases are reported because the patient stays in a very critical conduction needing special care. The following research investigates how a hospital ICU using central line bundle protocol is more efficient in preventing central line associated blood stream infection (Klevens et al, 2007­).  

Research objectives

            The objective of the research is to determine the effectiveness of hospital ICU’s use of central line bundle protocol over the standard precautions in the prevention of central line associated bloodstream infection. 

Nursing theoretical framework

The research will use an integrative nursing theoretical framework.

The theoretical framework will take control of both clinical and administrative processes in addressing the issue of CLABSI and the preventive practices. The integrative theoretical framework serves as a guide in making various decisions necessary for the advancement of the healthcare industry. In addition, the theoretical framework enhances communication with patients and staff, and assists in identifying solutions to most pressing issues affecting disease prevention practices (Schmieding, 1990). The theory will assist in looking at the CLABSI concept in a way that generates the necessary outcomes that agree with the null hypothesis. In addition, it will give a wide range of suggestions when more people will be interviewed and increases experiences in nursing practice. The integrative theory provides a framework of materials that a researcher requires in gathering the necessary information about the impact of bloodstream infection prevention measures. Operational structure in best-practice that most hospitals should follow since it acts as the major driving force for attainment of the organization goals, and improvement in the performance level. The structure stipulates role expectations of various individuals found within the organization. In addition, the structure provides a coordinated system of the correlation among the various units of the organization. The research will be guided by the nursing concept that discusses the importance of carrying out nursing researches. 

The theory will cover all nursing philosophies that will play a great in understanding their environment and designing the best approaches to follow. Nursing philosophy will address a broad area and more information concerning the best practice will be gathered. According to Alligood (2006), nursing philosophy is a discipline that provides direction, forming foundation for research development, and clarifying values that one requires in the healthcare industry. In addition, the theory will help in choosing the target group for the research because it forms the most important component of the proposal. In addition, the theory provides a base line for generating the main ideas that a researcher should have before facing the respondent group. 

On the other hand, the integrative theory will assist in discovering characteristics of people involved in the research and determine the best approaches to these people in order to gather information. The theory helps in integrating various life aspects that are needed in understanding the human psychology in order to make the respondent feel the need for carrying out this research. It identifies the guiding objectives, which a research needs to adopt to improve on quality of data collected, they encourage individual performance output level, and they give a structure for evaluating the research progress (Hertz, 2006). However, these goals need an outline in a quantitatively, measurable, time-bound, realistic, and applicable manner, for them to guide actions for the organization. On the other hand, the mission of an organization provides feedback to what the organization has done or intending to undertake.

            The nursing theory proposed will also ensure the type of data collected is more substantial and capable of helping even future researchers in the same discipline. Conceptualization will aid inn coming up with the most appropriate research aims and objectives that will ensure every aspect of the research topic is covered and the generated recommendations fits the suffering society.

Hypothesis

H1: Central line bundle protocol offers more effective prevention of central line bloodstream infection. The following hypothesis backs the fact the central line bundle protocol should be used in most hospitals ICU’s in preventing bloodstream infections.

H2: Central line bundle protocol is not effective in preventing central line associated bloodstream infections; instead hospitals ICU should use standard precautions. 

Literature review

            Most hospitals try to develop processes that improve the safety of patients in hospitals especially those at ICUs. According to Institute of Medicine, the US department of Health and Human Services (HHS) came up with a development plan that monitored various infection prevention strategies but none of them was very effective in preventing central line associated blood stream infections. With all the progress by the HHS there has been limited progress on the processes and systems for preventing bloodstream infections. The central bundle protocol was tested and found to yield more positive results from the number of patients tested. In an effort to increase ICU quality of care given to patients, research from Johns Hopkins University School of medicine developed a model that that carried out interventions of the rate of CLABSI. The teams used central bundle protocol that recorded a dramatic decrease in CLABSI cases in the 103 participants used (Arias & Carrico, 2009). 

            On the other hand, most of the bloodstream infections are caused by poor nursing practices where physicians use untreated tools for disease diagnosis. Practices for the insertion of central line have been promoted that indicates the best methods. A bundle approach to prevention of CLABSI was also introduced that ensured several cases of infections were reported in patients suffering from line bloodstream infections. Out of 158 Pennsylvania healthcare centers investigated in 2009, those that consistently followed the use of line bundle practices showed reduced cases of CLABSI. The bundle practices adopted were the use of maximal sterile barriers during insertion, chlorhexidine site preparation, and documentation of daily review that facilitated early removal (Advis PPS, 2010; Casey et al, 2003). The following practices indicated positive results though the researches never used line bundle protocol that seems to be more effective. 

 The standard precaution for CLABSI prevention is also effective, but has some limitations. The practice only prevents cross transmission of infections across the body leading to contamination of body fluids. Hospital-acquired Infections forms the largest killing agents in America. CLABSI is caused by such infections and the use of common antibiotics cannot cure the infection. Implementing the right protocols will make healthcare centers reduce risks of CLABSI and save more lives. According to McCaughey (2006), these infections can be prevented using central line bundle practice because it contains the necessary disinfectants that can cope with the infections. In addition, central line bundles come in different standards that meet different environmental conditions for each country’s healthcare facility’s preferences and protocol (IHI, 2008).  CLABSI is an avoidable situation when especially when the line bundle protocol is used in ICU patients. 

The cure of CLABSI is very costly where most people ignore it and let their loved ones die on hospital beds. There are many devices and products available in the market used in the prevention of CLABSI condition. These products are not recommended because the also block the blood vessels restraining blood movement to different body parts. According to the Health & Development Information Team, some of the methods used in accessing arteries, like use of needles increase the infection rates (2005). The team recommends the use of needless systems, like line bundle protocol, to access I.V tubing because they assist in preventing bloodstream infections. In addition, the Occupation Safety and Healthy provides recommendations for the best systems that hospital ICUs should use in preventing bloodstream infections depending of the amount of risk exposure. When needles systems are used line bundle protocol process forms the most effective method in preventing CLABSI (2012).  

Method 

Philosophy is a crucial process in the methodology design that aids in identification of a system for adoption in the methodology of a research that has no dependence on other systems. The philosophy identifies the process, the content, language, and knowledge of the methodology needed for a given research (Midgley, 2000). In addition, philosophy aids in making judgments that outline the boundaries of the research methodology process. The philosophy of methodology demands that the methodology adopted be stated and explanation, as well as analysis takes place effectively (Chiara 1997). 

 The methodology adopted will entail quantitative research methodologies. Quantitative method is a subjective research approach, which has a characterization of identification of new knowledge (Appleton, Briggs, and Rhatigan 1978), participation in the fieldwork, and use of the researcher as the key source of primary data. In the research process, the personnel conducting the research aim at getting the meaning of existence of a phenomenon and nature of reality. Moreover, the researchers have limited concerns on the outcomes and have more concerns of the research process. Quantitative method finds use as a descriptive study approached in an inductive manner. However, the analysis of quantitative data may use statistical tools that aid in making accurate inferences concerning the collected data.

Justification of the method

Qualitative research is a subjective method for data collection that aids in identification of new knowledge. On the other hand, quantitative research limits the chances of new knowledge discovery. Quantitative research creates an opportunity for discovery of the meaning and understanding of the issues that relate to social life or human beings behaviour. This occurs since quantitative research has an element of descriptive and the respondents provide data deemed to reflect personal perceptions. Moreover, rapport and trust play a significant role in the data collection process in any kind of research. Quantitative research benefits in establishing the two elements in data collection process. As such, the data collected has an element of reliability.

The questionnaires use scales to aid in achieving the desired response from the respondents. Respondents’ reflections come out clearly, when questionnaires find use in the research work. As such, the respondents give individual perception on the research topic. This is a significant technique of collecting information that has a correlation to the social aspect of human beings. The incorporation of interviews in the research work aid in creating an environment of trust between the interviewee and interviewer. As such, the information collected has a high level of accuracy and reliability.

Mixed method for research work aids in combining several methods to collect the same kind of data. The method ensures that data has no element of bias and that research errors occur rarely. The method creates room for use of both primary and secondary data collection method for the research. The use of several methods in collecting the same data aids in ensuring that the collected data has an element of credibility. Therefore, mixed method provides for checking of any ambiguity in the data collected.

Validity and reliability of data collection tools

To address issues about the quality of data and appropriateness of the methods to use in carrying out the research project, a pilot study will be done. After the pilot study, nursing experts in the faculty of medicine will check instrument for validity and review the items. The experts will then determine whether the instrument will cover the relevant content for which it is intended and will make the necessary adjustments.

Limitations 

            The research methodology adopted might face various limitations as shown. First, failure of the target group to respond to the questionnaires and interviews will limit the strength of results generated. In addition, some hospital might refuse entry to the ICU areas in fear of interfering with the patients. Second, the research team members might fail the research especially when they do not carry out the research effectively and gives false findings. 

Data collection

The primary outcomes for the data collected will form the quarterly rate of CLABSI measured per 1,000 central line days. The infection perfectionists will be independent of ICUs and will be asked to give definitions of the state of bloodstream infections. In data collection process, questionnaires will be formulated. 10 hospitals from 3 districts will be selected at random. In each hospital, the target group will consist of 5 patients in ICUs suffering from CLABSI, 3 nurses, 1 doctor, and 1 physician. The target groups will be expected to respond to questionnaires, and interviews each taking approximately 3 hours. The questionnaires will consist of questions that will elicit a response from the respondent. The questions include factual questions, questions based on the desired information, questions directed to self-perception of the respondent, opinion and attitude based questions, and projective questions (Powell 2004).

The questionnaires that will have to be disseminated will be scaled. This will aid in obtaining the desired response from the respondents. The questionnaires context will have uniformity for better results that will aid in an effective analysis of the trends of the sample population responses. In addition, the questionnaire will contain cross check questions to aid in data analysis. The sample population to respond to questionnaires needs prior examination for identification of any limitations or barriers of ineffectiveness of the questionnaire.

The data collection procedure begins with the establishment of a pre-test for the questionnaire. This is a necessary step that aids in identification of the complexity of the questionnaires to be administered. Pre-test also aids in the formulation of measures to overcome research limitations. This occurs since, in the process of pre-test, possible challenges for the research work are effectively identified. The whole data collection procedure is expected to take one month depending on the nature of the research and patient conditions. 

However, the respondents for the questionnaires and the people to be interviewed need a careful selection to elicit reliable and high quality information. Data collected has a base on the information gathered from the respondents. Therefore, the attitude and perception of the respondents towards the research and willingness of the respondents to participate in the research affects the credibility of the data collected extensively.

Questionnaires and interviews            

In the data collection process, questionnaires administering will occur. In this, the respondent will be given the questionnaires to fill. The period for filling the questionnaires has a limitation of six hours. This provides enough time for the respondent to fill the questionnaire and return, and collection of the filled questionnaires. On the same note, the time prevents the emergence of situations in which the respondents may discuss the questionnaires.

 Interviews will take place in the process of data collection. The interviews will comprise of structured questions that will aid in effectiveness in collecting of the desired data for the research (Weller, and Romney 1988). The kind of the interview will consists of personal interview for the research being carried. Interviews that will take place have a limitation of thirty minutes in each session. This ensures that the research utilizes the time allocated effectively. The location of interviews will vary depending on the organization in which the research is taking place.

Data analysis

            After collecting the relevant data an analysis will follow. The analysis will use mathematical statistical tools like graphs and charts in making comparisons. In addition, the collected data will be fed to statistical applications like SPSS that will convert the raw data into a more comprehendible mean.

 

 

References

Advis PPS. (2010). Beyond the bundle: reducing the risk of central line-associated bloodstream

            Infections. Pa Patient Saf Advis, 7 (suppl 1): 1-9.

Alligood, M. r. (2010). Introduction to Nursing Theory: Its history, significance, and analysis. 

            Nursing theorists and their work (7th ed.). MO: Maryland Heights, pp. 3-5.

Arias, K. M. & Carrico, R. (2009). APIC Text of Infection Control and 

Epidemiology, Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, 3rd ed). Washington, DC

Casey, A. L., Worthington, T., Lambert, P. A., et al. (2003).A randomized, prospective clinical 

trial to access the potential infection risk associated with the PosiFlow needleless connector. J Hosp Infect; 54: 288–93.

Centre for Disease Control and Prevention. (2012). Health Infection Control Practices Advisory 

Committee (HICPAC). Retrieved from:

http://www.cdc.gov/hicpac/

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2005). Reduction in central line-associated 

bloodstream infections among patients in intensive care units–Pennsylvania, 54: 1013–1016

Chiara, M. (1997). The Tenth International Congress of Logic, Methodology and Philosophy

of Science, Florence, August 1995. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

Comprehensive unit-based safety program (CUSP) and HAI. (2011). National-international 

            Initiatives. Premier Inc. retrieved from:

 https://www.premierinc.com/safety/topics/bundling/national.jsp.

Health & Development Information Team. (2005). Health Management Information Systems

            DFID Health Resource Centre. Retrieved from:

            http://www.who.int/healthmetrics/library/issue_1_05apr.doc

Hertz, H. (2006). Health Care Criteria For Performance Excellence: Baldrige National

Quality. Business and Economics. DIANE

Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI). (2008), Cambridge, MA. 5 Million Lives Campaign. 

            Getting Started Kit: Prevent Central Line Infections How-to Guide. Retrieved from:

www.ihi.org

Klevens R. M., et al. (2007). Estimating health care-associated infections and deaths in U.S.

            hospitals, Public Health Rep 2007; 122:160–166

McCaughey, B. (2006). Hospital infection is the next asbestos. New York Law Journal. Retrieved 

            from:

www.hospitalinfection.org

Midgley, G. (2000). Systemic Intervention: Philosophy, Methodology, and Practice. 233

Spring Street New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

Powell, R. (2004). Basic Research Methods for Librarians. The Third Edition. Greenwich:

Ablex Publishing Corporation.

Schmieding, N. J. (1990). An integrative Nursing Theoretical Framework. US National Library 

            of Medicine, 15(4); 8-9. 

Shi, L, & Singh, D. (2008). Delivering Health Care in America: A Systems Approach. The

Fourth Edition. Jones & Bartlett Learning.

 

 

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount.

Simple Steps to get your Paper Done
For Quality Papers

Is hand hygiene effective in the reduction of nosocomial infection in ICU patients?objective. To study potential determinants of hand hygiene compliance among healthcare workers in the hospital setting.

Answering this PICO question, “Is hand hygiene effective in the reduction of nosocomial infection in ICU patients?”

infection control and hospital epidemiology may 2009, vol. 30, no. 5

o r i g i n a l a r t i c l e

A Qualitative Exploration of Reasons for Poor Hand Hygiene Among Hospital Workers: Lack of Positive Role Models

and of Convincing Evidence That Hand Hygiene Prevents Cross-Infection

V. Erasmus, MSc; W. Brouwer, MSc; E. F. van Beeck, MD, PhD; A. Oenema, PhD; T. J. Daha; J. H. Richardus, MD, PhD; M. C. Vos, MD, PhD; J. Brug, PhD

objective. To study potential determinants of hand hygiene compliance among healthcare workers in the hospital setting.

design. A qualitative study based on structured-interview guidelines, consisting of 9 focus group interviews involving 58 persons and 7 individual interviews. Interview transcripts were subjected to content analysis.

setting. Intensive care units and surgical departments of 5 hospitals of varying size in the Netherlands.

participants. A total of 65 nurses, attending physicians, medical residents, and medical students.

results. Nurses and medical students expressed the importance of hand hygiene for preventing of cross-infection among patients and themselves. Physicians expressed the importance of hand hygiene for self-protection, but they perceived that there is a lack of evidence that handwashing is effective in preventing cross-infection. All participants stated that personal beliefs about the efficacy of hand hygiene and examples and norms provided by senior hospital staff are of major importance for hand hygiene compliance. They further reported that hand hygiene is most often performed after tasks that they perceive to be dirty, and personal protection appeared to be more important for compliance that patient safety. Medical students explicitly mentioned that they copy the behavior of their superiors, which often leads to noncompliance during clinical practice. Physicians mentioned that their noncompliance arises from their belief that the evidence supporting the effectiveness of hand hygiene for prevention of hospital-acquired infections is not strong.

conclusion. The results indicate that beliefs about the importance of self-protection are the main reasons for performing hand hygiene. A lack of positive role models and social norms may hinder compliance.

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2009; 30:415-419

From the Departments of Public Health (V.E., W.B., E.F.v.B., A.O., J.H.R.) and Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (M.C.V.), University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Dutch Society for Hygiene and Infection Prevention in Healthcare, Leiden (T.J.D.), and the EMGO Institute, Amsterdam (J.B.), the Netherlands.

Received August 20, 2008; accepted December 4, 2008; electronically published April 2, 2009. � 2009 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved. 0899-823X/2009/3005-0002$15.00. DOI: 10.1086/596773

Hospital-acquired infections are a major threat to patients and place a great burden on national healthcare services.1,2 This problem must be combated with an adequate level of hand hygiene compliance, which is of crucial importance in pre- venting cross-transmission3-5 and has been identified as a health policy priority.1,6 However, the level of hand hygiene compli- ance remains low worldwide, and it was termed “unacceptably poor” by a public health authority in London, United King- dom.7 Interventions aimed at improving hand hygiene com- pliance have been implemented, but the effects of these inter- ventions remain modest and/or of short duration.8,9 To develop interventions with more-pronounced and sustainable effects, information is needed on the behavioral determinants of hand hygiene compliance.10 This topic has only recently started re- ceiving attention by investigators involved in hand hygiene

research.11,12 Qualitative research can provide valuable insight into possible behavioral determinants13,14 and is often the first step in a stepwise approach to intervention development.15

Qualitative methods have, however, rarely been used to evaluate hand hygiene compliance among healthcare workers. Com- pliance with hand hygiene among different groups of hospital workers may be influenced by beliefs and norms that vary across the groups. Review of the international literature reveals that the hand hygiene behavior of nurses has been studied most extensively.16,17 Physician compliance is often found to be lower than that of nurses,18,19 although the reason for this is not always clear. Medical students’ hand washing behavior has rarely been studied,20 although research into their behavior could provide essential knowledge on how tomorrow’s phy- sicians could be stimulated to comply with hand hygiene guide-

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount.

Simple Steps to get your Paper Done
For Quality Papers

Nursing Research Utilization Project Proposal (pressure ulcer reduction) Monitoring and Evaluation Phase

Nursing Research Utilization Project Proposal (pressure ulcer reduction) Monitoring and Evaluation Phase.

 

Write a paper in implementing a project proposal to reduce pressure ulcers in an acute hospital.
The proposed project to be implemented is by adding an electronic documentation system that recorded harm events and documented initial pressure ulcer risk assessment among all admitted cases. In the new program, staff charge nurses will conduct pressure ulcer assessments in admission. Instead of documenting in paper form, they will directly record these findings on an initial risk assessment electronic form and simultaneously make an e-referral to the wound consult nurse if a patient has a pressure ulcer that is a stage 2 or higher.
The

Use the attached article as one of the references:
Pittman, J., Beeson, T., Kitterman, J., Lancaster, S. and Shelly, A. (2015). Medical device?
related hospital-acquired pressure ulcers. Development of an evidence-based position
statement. Journal Wound Ostomy Continence Nurse, 42(2), 151-154.
DOI: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000113

The assignment should have 4 main sections. Use the attached example as a template.
Please use subheadings to identify each section (see APA 6.0 for formatting heading levels). Do not forget to include the appendix copy and paste it, do not attach as a separate document.
1) Monitoring

Describe the methods for monitoring solution implementation using the steps of the model you chose.
2) Evaluation

Describe the methods to be used to evaluate the solution.
3) Outcome Measure

Describe an outcome measure that evaluates the extent to which the project objective is achieved. A copy of the measure must be included in the appendix. For example: If your problem is falls or CAUTIs, then your objective would be to reduce the rate/numbers and the outcome measure is the form or graph you track the number of falls or number of CAUTIs. If your problem is the lack of knowledge of your nurses regarding lateral violence, then your outcome measure could be a pre and posttest.
The outcome measure for this propose project is: The expected result of the change implementation in California Health Medical Center (CHMC) is to have a reduction in the incidence of newly acquired pressure ulcers development from the current rate of 15% to 10% in all patients in the hospital within six months.

Describe the ways in which the outcome measure is valid and appropriate for use in this proposed project.

4) Evaluation Data Collection

Describe the methods for collecting outcome measure data and the rationale for using those methods.
Identify resources needed for evaluation.
Discuss the feasibility of the evaluation plan.

Format your paper consistent with APA 6.0 guidelines.
Include a minimum of 4 scholarly references
Minimum word count of 800.

J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2015;42(2):151-154.
Published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
WOUND CARE
Copyright ? 2015 by the Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society? J WOCN ? March/April 2015 151
Patient safety and prevention of harm are foundational
principles of healthcare, and nursing in particular, yet patients
continue to develop pressure ulcers while under our
care. Hospital-acquired pressure ulcers (HAPUs) cause pain,
loss of function, and infection, extend hospital stays, and
increase costs. The cost of treating these wounds is approximately
$11 billion a year. In spite of progress in wound
care products, support surfaces, and prevention methods,
occurrences of pressure ulcers persist. 1 Medical device-related
HAPUs are common in both adults and children in
the acute care setting.
Medical Device?Related HospitalAcquired
Pressure Ulcers
Development of an Evidence-Based Position Statement
Joyce Pittman Terrie Beeson Jessica Kitterman Shelley Lancaster Anita Shelly
? ABSTRACT
Hospital-acquired pressure ulcers (HAPUs) are a problem
in the acute care setting causing pain, loss of function,
infection, extended hospital stay, and increased costs. In
spite of best practice strategies, occurrences of pressure
ulcers continue. Many of these HAPUs are related to
a medical device. Correct assessment and reporting of
device-related HAPUs were identifi ed as an important
issue in our organization. Following the Iowa Model
for Evidence-Based Practice to Promote Quality Care,
a task force was created, a thorough review of current
evidence and clinical practice recommendations was
performed, and a defi nition for medical device-related
HAPU and an evidence-based position statement were
developed. Content of the statement was reviewed by
experts and appropriate revisions were made. This position
statement provides guidance and structure to accurately
identify and report device-related HAPU across our
18 healthcare facilities. Through the intentional focus on
pressure ulcer prevention and evidence-based practice in
our organization and the use of this position statement,
identifi cation and reporting of device-related HAPUs
have improved with a decrease in overall HAPU rates
of 33% from 2011 and 2012. This article describes the
development and implementation of this device-related
HAPU position statement within our organization.
KEY WORDS: Evidence-based , Iowa Model , Medical devicerelated
pressure ulcers , Position statement
A pressure ulcer can occur wherever external pressure
impairs circulation to the skin. Pressure ulcers have been
defi ned by the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel
(NPUAP) as ?a localized injury to the skin and/or underlying
tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of
pressure, or pressure in combination with shear.? 2(p6) This
defi nition is helpful but many pressure ulcers occur as a
result of external pressure from medical devices that do not
completely fi t this defi nition. The NPUAP addressed devicerelated
HAPUs, which develop on mucosal membranes by
issuing a statement describing the inappropriate use of staging/category
classifi cation due to anatomical differences
between mucosal membrane with skin structures. The
National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators recommends
using the term ?indeterminate? when classifying
HAPUs over mucosal membranes when reporting HAPU. 3,4
However, neither of these recommendations provides a
clear and concise defi nition for all device-related HAPUs.
Hospital-acquired pressure ulcer development is considered
a quality indicator across healthcare systems. 5
Healthcare facilities are required to track and report HAPU
rates. In our large academic healthcare system, prevention
and accurate identifi cation and classifi cation of HAPUs are
a high priority. Monthly skin audits within our facility
found that a high percentage, often more than 50%, of
HAPUs are device related. In addition, the identifi cation,
Joyce Pittman, PhD, ANP-BC, FNP-BC, CWOCN, Indiana University
Health?Methodist, Indiana University School of Nursing, Indianapolis.
Terrie Beeson, MSN, RN, CCRN, ACNS-BC, Indiana University
Health- University Hospital, Indianapolis.
Jessica Kitterman, BSN, CWOCN, Indiana University Health- Ball
Hospital, Muncie.
Shelley Lancaster, MSN, CNS, CWOCN, Indiana University HealthWest
Hospital, Indianapolis.
Anita Shelly, MSN, CNS, CWOCN, Indiana University Health- Riley
Hospital, Indianapolis.
The authors declare no confl icts of interest.
Correspondence: Joyce Pittman, PhD, ANP-BC, FNP-BC, CWOCN,
Indiana University Health?Methodist, Indiana University School of
Nursing, 1701 Senate Blvd, Room B651, Indianapolis, IN 46202
( Jpittma3@iuhealth.org ).
DOI: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000113
Copyright ? 2015 Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society?. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
JWOCN-D-14-00006_LR 151 WOCN-D-14-00006_LR 151 21/02/15 2:01 PM 1/02/15 2:01 PM
152 Pittman et al J WOCN ? March/April 2015
defi nition, and reporting of these types of HAPU are inconsistent
with high variation across this organization?s
acute care facilities. Therefore, a task force was created and
given the directive to explore this issue. The purpose of
this article is to describe the process this task force used to
address this important issue.
? Development of the Project
When examining a practice issue or problem, it is helpful to
use a model that provides a guide to identify areas of clinical
inquiry through synthesis and application of research fi ndings.
6 One such model is the Iowa Model of Evidence-based
Practice to Promote Quality Care (Figure 1). It provides guidance
for nurses to use research fi ndings for improvement of
patient care. Using this model, we fi rst created a task force
that included members of our Pressure Ulcer Prevention systemwide
committee. Task force members represented 4 of
our adult acute care facilities and our childrens? hospital.
Four of the task force members were certifi ed WOC nurses,
3 were also masters prepared and/or a clinical nurse specialist,
and 1 member was doctorally prepared. Using the Iowa
Model of Evidence-based Practice to Promote Quality Care,
the task force identifi ed medical device-related pressure ulcers
as a problem-focused trigger, a clinical problem, and a
priority of the healthcare organization. This was an important
fi rst step because a topic that is aligned with the strategic
goals of the organization and embraced by staff has a
high likelihood of being adopted by those providing care. 6
In addition, connecting the knowledge gained from research
to an organizational initiative that has relevance to both the
organization and the WOC nurse creates an opportunity
and environment for support that might not be available if
the topic were chosen to fulfi ll local interests alone. 7
Developing a well-formulated purpose statement is
benefi cial once the topic or problem is identifi ed. The
purpose statement directs the evidence search, helps focus
reading, and defi nes the boundaries and limits around the
work to be accomplished. Finally, we advocate formulating
a clear and concise purpose statement to assist with
developing an appropriate implementation and evaluation
plan. The task force was charged with developing a
standardized, evidence-based defi nition for device-related
HAPU, which would support appropriate identifi cation
and reporting of these pressure ulcers.
The next step in the Iowa Model is to appraise the evidence
related to the question or purpose statement. In
order to fi nd the most current new knowledge related to
device-related pressure ulcers, a search was conducted of
the current relevant literature. We searched the MEDLINE
electronic database. Key search strategies were: (1) time
frame: 1996 to September 2012; (2) exp *?Equipment and
Supplies?/ (312834); (3) exp *Pressure Ulcer/ep, et
[Epidemiology, Etiology] (851); (4) 1 and 2 (84); (5) limit 3
to (English language and humans) (78); and (6) from 4
keep 2?4, 6, 13, 16?17, 20, 23?24, 26?31, 35?39, 53?54, 64,
69?71, 76?78 (30). This search identifi ed 30 references,
which were reviewed by our team.
The task force identifi ed the defi nition of medical devices
by the Food Drug & Cosmetic Act as integral to developing
a defi nition of device-related HAPUs. The US
Food and Drug Administration defi nes a medical device as
??an instrument, apparatus, implement, machine, contrivance,
implant, in vitro reagent, or other similar or related
article, including a component part, or accessory
which is: recognized in the offi cial National Formulary, or
the United States Pharmacopoeia, or any supplement to
them, intended for use in the diagnosis of disease or other
conditions, or in the cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention
of disease, in man or other animals, or intended
to affect the structure or any function of the body of man
or other animals, and which does not achieve any of its
primary intended purposes through chemical action
within or on the body of man or other animals and which
is not dependent upon being metabolized for the achievement
of any of its primary intended purposes.? 8(p1)
Another important piece of evidence was that of the
NPUAP and its work surrounding pressure ulcers. The
NPUAP hosted a consensus conference in 2010 and again in
2014 to discuss the complexities of avoidable versus unavoidable
HAPUs. As a result of this work, NPUAP has led
efforts of the wound and pressure ulcer expert community
in identifying key components related to pressure ulcer development
and the complexities surrounding these wounds.
This work is in its initial stages, but a state of the science
article was published recently describing unavoidable pressure
ulcer incidence and the key risk factors that infl uence
them. 9 One of these key risk factors identifi ed is that of medical
devices. Medical device-related pressure ulcers are diffi
cult to prevent as they are necessary for treatment. They are
also challenging to assess due to the inability to remove
them in certain instances, and they may produce compromise
of underlying tissue due to moisture or edema.
Many states are recognizing the importance of HAPUs
and are requiring the reporting of prevalence of HAPUs as
a quality measure. Minnesota used data collected through
mandatory statewide adverse health events reporting system
to identify trends in causative factors for device-related
pressure ulcers. An interdisciplinary team convened
to develop best practices for prevention of pressure ulcers
related to the use of medical devices. 10 Although the fi ndings
from this report are helpful, no defi nitive defi nition
for device-related HAPUs was described.
? Implementation of the Project
Using the US Food and Drug Administration defi nition for
medical devices, evidence-based guidelines, and position
statements from various organizations, and results of an expert
review, the task force defi ned device-related skin injury
to those devices that were medical and external. The task
force identifi ed 2 critical elements to be included in the
Copyright ? 2015 Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society?. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
JWOCN-D-14-00006_LR 152 WOCN-D-14-00006_LR 152 21/02/15 2:01 PM 1/02/15 2:01 PM
J WOCN ? Volume 42/Number 2 Pittman et al 153
Assemble Relevant Research & Related Literature
Critique & Synthesize Research for Use in Practice
Yes No
Yes
Is Change
Appropriate for
Adoption in
Practice?
Yes Institute the Change in Practice
No
Continue to Evaluate Quality
of Care and New Knowledge
No
Disseminate Results
Problem Focused Triggers
1. Risk Management Data
2. Process Improvement Data
3. Internal/External Benchmarking Data
4. Financial Data
5. Identification of Clinical Problem
Knowledge Focused Triggers
2. National Agencies or Organizational
Standards & Guidelines
3. Philosophies of Care
4. Questions from Institutional Standards Committee
1. New Research or Other Literature
Consider
Other
Triggers
Is this Topic
a Priority
For the
Organization?
Form a Team
Is There
a Sufficient
Research
Base?
Pilot the Change in Practice
1. Select Outcomes to be Achieved
2. Collect Baseline Data
3. Design Evidence-Based
Practice (EBP) Guideline(s)
4. Implement EBP on Pilot Units
5. Evaluate Process & Outcomes
6. Modify the Practice Guideline
Base Practice on Other
Types of Evidence:
1. Case Reports
2. Expert Opinion
3. Scientific Principles
4. Theory
Conduct
Research
Monitor and Analyze Structure,
Process, and Outcome Data
? Environment
? Staff
? Cost
? Patient and Family
The Iowa Model of Evidence-Based
Practice to Promote Quality Care
DO NOT REPRODUCE WITHOUT PERMISSION Revised April 1998 ? UIHC
= a decision point Titler, M.G., Kleiber, C., Steelman, V.J., Rakel., B. A., Budreau, G., Everett, L.Q.,
Buckwalter, K.C., Tripp-Reimer, T., & Goode C. (2001). The Iowa Model Of EvidenceBased
Practice to Promote Quality Care. Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America,
13(4), 497-509.
REQUESTS TO:
Department of Nursing
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
Iowa City, IA 52242-1009
FIGURE 1. The Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice to Promote Quality Care. Reprinted with permission from the University
of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics and Marita G. Titler, PhD, RN, FAAN, Copyright 1998. For permission to use or reproduce the model,
please contact the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics at 319-384-9098 or uihcnursingresearchandebp@uiowa.edu
Copyright ? 2015 Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society?. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
JWOCN-D-14-00006_LR 153 WOCN-D-14-00006_LR 153 21/02/15 2:01 PM 1/02/15 2:01 PM
154 Pittman et al J WOCN ? March/April 2015
defi nition of device-related HAPUs: (1) NPUAP defi nition of
pressure ulcers provides the basis of the defi nition and (2)
device-related HAPUs will be limited to external medical devices.
After a thorough review of the evidence and using
clinical practice expertise, an evidence-based device-related
HAPU defi nition for adults and pediatrics was developed. A
device-related HAPU is defi ned as a localized injury to the
skin and/or underlying tissue including mucous membranes,
as a result of pressure, with a history of an external medical
device at the location of the ulcer, and mirrors the shape of
the device. This defi nition provides needed guidance, structure,
and process to assist with prevention, identifi cation,
reporting, and treatment of medical device-related HAPU.
The task force used this evidence-based defi nition to develop
the Medical Device-Related Pressure Ulcer Position
Statement. Following the format example of the Wound,
Ostomy and Continence Nursing Society and other organizations,
a position statement was developed. In order to
improve the content validity of the position statement, experts
in wound management and pressure ulcers were asked
to review the content. Based on their recommendations,
appropriate revisions were incorporated into the document.
The next step in the Iowa Model is to move the evidence
into practice. Effective dissemination of evidence
includes mindful communication among opinion leaders,
change champions, core groups of infl uence, and academic
detailing. Opinion leaders were defi ned as those colleagues
who are viewed as important and respected sources
of infl uence among their peers. Change champions
embrace and demonstrate the persistence necessary to promote
the adoption of evidence.
The task force disseminated the position statement by
informing various systemwide leadership groups involved
in patient quality/safety, systemwide pressure ulcer prevention
committee, facility-specifi c WOC nurse experts,
and facility-specifi c direct-care nurse wound teams.
Dissemination continues as the use of the Medical DeviceRelated
Pressure Ulcer Position Statement is integrated
into the process of conducting our monthly facility-wide
pressure ulcer prevalence surveys.
? Conclusion
A pressure ulcer may occur wherever external pressure impairs
circulation to the skin. Pressure ulcers cause pain, loss
of function, and infection, extend hospital stays, and increase
cost. In addition, pressure ulcer development is considered
a quality indicator across healthcare systems. 5
Increased scrutiny and reduced payment or nonpayment
for HAPU by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
has made the prevention and early detection of pressure
ulcers a prominent quality improvement initiative of
healthcare systems across the country. A key component in
prevention and detection of pressure-related injury is an
accurate skin assessment. In order to perform an accurate
skin assessment, an evidence-based defi nition for devicerelated
pressure ulcers is crucial. Our Device-Related
Pressure Ulcer Position Statement guides practice, education,
and research within this healthcare organization. This
defi nition is used when identifying, reporting, treating, and
developing prevention strategies for device-related HAPU.
It has proven useful for distinguishing between pressure
ulcers resulting from an external medical device versus
nonmedical device. Through the intentional focus on pressure
ulcer prevention and evidence-based practice in our
organization and the use of this position statement, identi-
fi cation and reporting of medical device-related HAPUs
have improved with a decrease in overall HAPU rates of
33% from 2011 and 2012. This concise and evidence-based
position statement supports appropriate and consistent
identifi cation and reporting of medical device?related pressure
ulcers. Staging of these ulcers continues to follow the
staging recommendations of NPUAP and National Database
for Nursing Quality Indicators reporting instructions.
? References
1. Ayello E , Lyder C . Protecting patients from harm: preventing
pressure ulcers . Nursing 2007 ; 37 : 36-40 .
2. EPUAP/NPUAP . European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel and
National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. Treatment of Pressure
Ulcers: Quick Reference Guide. Washington, DC : National
Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel ; 2009 .
3. Berquist-Beringer S , Davidson J . NDNQI: Pressure Ulcer Training.
2013 . Accessed December 18, 2014 . at https://members.nursing
quality.org/NDNQIPressureUlcerTraining/
4. NPUAP. Mucosal Pressure Ulcers: An NPUAP Position Statement
2012. Accessed December 18, 2014 at http://www.npuap.org/
wp-content/uploads/2012/03/Mucosal_Pressure_Ulcer_
Position_Statement_fi nal.pdf
5. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Hospital-Acquired
Conditions and Present on Admission Indicator Reporting
Provision. Accessed December 18, 2014 at http://www.cms
.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-NetworkMLN/MLNProducts/Downloads/wPOAFactSheet.pdf

6. Titler M , Kleiber C , Steelman V , et al. The Iowa model of
evidence-based practice to promote quality care . Crit Care Nurs
Clin North Am. 2001 ; 13 ( 4 ): 497-509 .
7. Stanley T , Sitterding M , Broome M , McCaskey M . Engaging and
developing research leaders in practice: Creating a foundation
for a culture of clinical inquiry . J Pediatr Nurs. 2011 ; 26 : 480-488 .
8. Food and Drug Administration . Is the product a medical device
? http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulation
andGuidance/Overview/ClassifyYourDevice/ucm051512.htm .
Published 2013. Accessed December 16, 2013.
9. Edsberg LE , Langemo D , Baharestani MM , Posthauer ME ,
Goldberg M . Unavoidable pressure injury: state of the science
and consensus outcomes . J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs.
2014 ; 41 ( 4 ): 313-334 .
10. Apold J , Rydrych D . Preventing device-related pressure ulcers:
using data to guide statewide change . J Nurs Care Qual.
2012 ; 27 ( 1 ): 28-34 .
The CE test for this article is available online only at the journal website, jwocnonline.com, and
the test must be taken online at NursingCenter.com/CE/JWOCN.
Copyright ? 2015 Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society?. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.
JWOCN-D-14-00006_LR 154 WOCN-D-14-00006_LR 154 21/02/15 2:01 PM 1/02/15 2:01 PM

Nursing Research Utilization Project Proposal (pressure ulcer reduction) Monitoring and Evaluation Phase

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount.

Simple Steps to get your Paper Done
For Quality Papers

Describe the harm reduction philosophy underpinning your chosen program and discuss the applicability of harm reduction practice to the community health nursing standards.

Describe the harm reduction philosophy underpinning your chosen program and discuss the applicability of harm reduction practice to the community health nursing standards..

Describe harm reduction as a strategy community nursing practice./ Pot and Driving Campaign

Describe harm reduction as a strategy community nursing practice./ Pot and Driving Campaign
? Describe the harm reduction philosophy underpinning your chosen program and
discuss the applicability of harm reduction practice to the community health nursing
standards. (5 marks)
? Describe the basis and rationale for harm reduction as a strategy for the clients served
by your chosen program, through an examination of epidemiological data, prevalence data, and best practice. Include a critical analysis of the determinants of health of the
aggregate group, which increase the incidence and risk of harm (25 marks)
? Present and analyze current evidence that supports or rejects a harm reduction
approach to the issue. Utilize the findings from your literature review (minimum EIGHT
scholarly journal articles from peer reviewed sources) and research related to this
program, to critically analyze the value of the program as a community health nursing
intervention (25 marks)
? Discuss your carefully considered conclusion with regard to the application of your
program to public health practice. Include an argument for continuation or
discontinuation of the program on the basis of the research and evidence. (5 marks)
? Introduction, Conclusion, Presentation, Spelling, Grammar, APA (5 marks)
Comments from Support Team: I am doing a assignment on Harm reduction.

topic is The Pot and Driving Campaign

http://www.cpha.ca/en/programs/potanddriving/about.aspx THIS IS THE WEBSITE OF MY PROGRAM AND WHAT THEY DO.

PLEASE USE CANADIAN PEER REVIEWED ARTICLES.

YOU NEED TO USE CANADIAN STATISTICS AS WELL.

Describe the harm reduction philosophy underpinning your chosen program and discuss the applicability of harm reduction practice to the community health nursing standards.

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount.

Simple Steps to get your Paper Done
For Quality Papers

Describe harm reduction as a strategy community nursing practice./ Pot and Driving Campaign

Describe harm reduction as a strategy community nursing practice./ Pot and Driving Campaign.

? Describe the harm reduction philosophy underpinning your chosen program and
discuss the applicability of harm reduction practice to the community health nursing
standards. (5 marks)
? Describe the basis and rationale for harm reduction as a strategy for the clients served
by your chosen program, through an examination of epidemiological data, prevalence data, and best practice. Include a critical analysis of the determinants of health of the
aggregate group, which increase the incidence and risk of harm (25 marks)
? Present and analyze current evidence that supports or rejects a harm reduction
approach to the issue. Utilize the findings from your literature review (minimum EIGHT
scholarly journal articles from peer reviewed sources) and research related to this
program, to critically analyze the value of the program as a community health nursing
intervention (25 marks)
? Discuss your carefully considered conclusion with regard to the application of your
program to public health practice. Include an argument for continuation or
discontinuation of the program on the basis of the research and evidence. (5 marks)
? Introduction, Conclusion, Presentation, Spelling, Grammar, APA (5 marks)
Comments from Support Team: I am doing a assignment on Harm reduction.

topic is The Pot and Driving Campaign

http://www.cpha.ca/en/programs/potanddriving/about.aspx THIS IS THE WEBSITE OF MY PROGRAM AND WHAT THEY DO.

Describe harm reduction as a strategy community nursing practice./ Pot and Driving Campaign

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount.

Simple Steps to get your Paper Done
For Quality Papers

Conduct a literature review and internet search for risk reduction strategies aimed at preventing wrong-site surgeries.

Conduct a literature review and internet search for risk reduction strategies aimed at preventing wrong-site surgeries..

Process Improvement OpportunitiesScenario:

You are the director of quality in a 200-bed hospital. The organization has identified three process improvement opportunities: improve collection of patient advance directives, emergency department wait times, and discharge of patients before noon.

For this assignment, select one of these process opportunities. Your task, as sponsor and team facilitator, is to develop a robust team charter (see exhibit 7.2 in our textbook).

  • First, research the opportunity you selected to understand how progressive organizations have addressed the challenge.
  • Next, determine and justify the size of the team and identify the specific positions (to include physicians) that you would include as members. Describe the role of each member.
  • Then, craft a robust problem statement and team charter.
  • Finally, create a draft agenda and Gantt chart or timeline (select just one) for the first meeting of the team.

The paper should be well-written and meet the following requirements:

  • Four pages in length(excluding title page, reference list and exhibits)
  • The team charter, draft agenda, and Gantt chart / timeline should be included as exhibits in the paper, but thoroughly discussed and justified in the body of the paper.
  • Include at least three references from the peer-reviewed articles. The CSU-Global Library is a good place to find peer-reviewed articles.
  • Conforms to CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA.

Essay 2: Risk Reduction: Preventing Wrong-Site Surgeries

Conduct a literature review and internet search for risk reduction strategies aimed at preventing wrong-site surgeries.

For this assignment, you will write a memo addressed to the Chief Nursing Officer. Explain and justify four to six specific strategies that could best prevent a similar event from occurring.

The memo should be well-written and meet the following requirements:

  • Two pages (single-spaced) in length
  • Include at least three references from the peer-reviewed articles. The CSU-Global Library is a good place to find peer-reviewed articles.

Conduct a literature review and internet search for risk reduction strategies aimed at preventing wrong-site surgeries.

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount.

Simple Steps to get your Paper Done
For Quality Papers

Determine the supporting factors that would aid in the reduction of healthcare cost in your organization without reducing quality of care for the patients.

Determine the supporting factors that would aid in the reduction of healthcare cost in your organization without reducing quality of care for the patients..

Determine the supporting factors that would aid in the reduction of healthcare cost in your organization without reducing quality of care for the patients.

 

 

Paper instructions:
Assume that you are a quality officer who is responsible for one (1) of the state™s largest healthcare organizations. You have been told that the quality of patient care has decreased, and you have been assigned a project that is geared toward increasing quality of care for the patients.

Write a 3 page paper in which you:
1. Analyze three (3) quality initiatives for your organization.

2. Determine the supporting factors that would aid in the reduction of healthcare cost in your organization without reducing quality of care for the patients.

3. Differentiate between quality in a free market healthcare system and in single-payer government system with three (3) examples for each.

4. Specify three (3) common law quality initiatives that are still found in 21st century healthcare organizations.

5. Defend your position on the importance of healthcare quality for your organization. Provide support with at least three (3) examples that illustrate your position.

6. Assemble a plan to protect patient information that complies with all legal requirements.

7. Use at least three (3) quality references. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.

Determine the supporting factors that would aid in the reduction of healthcare cost in your organization without reducing quality of care for the patients.

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount.

Simple Steps to get your Paper Done
For Quality Papers

Briefly explain how a reduction in oil production will affect the supply and demand curve and indicate your answer on a graph

Briefly explain how a reduction in oil production will affect the supply and demand curve and indicate your answer on a graph.

Managerial Economics

We are driven to buy and sell goods and services in the market by two simple facts. First, most of us are incapable of producing everything we want to consume. Second, even if we could produce all our own goods and services, it would still make sense to specialize, producing only one product and trading it for other desired goods and services.

– Differentiate, with the help of a graph, between demand and supply at a global marketplace.
– Explain, by means of a graph, how an equilibrium price is set in the demand and supply market.
– Discuss, by means of a graph, the rise and fall of demand and supply results in disequilibrium (shortage or surplus). Explain how the self-correcting nature of the market will fix the status of disequilibrium and go back to equilibrium.
– Briefly explain how a reduction in oil production will affect the supply and demand curve and indicate your answer on a graph.

Instructions when completing the assessment: You must have the following:

• An introduction to the topic of the assessment
• Definition and discussion of the key terms (with proper citation)
• Graphs (where required, label the axes and curves and indicate any changes)
• Discussion (of findings of the graphs)
• Conclusion and recommendation
• References

Kindly let me know if you have any question.

Briefly explain how a reduction in oil production will affect the supply and demand curve and indicate your answer on a graph

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount.

Simple Steps to get your Paper Done
For Quality Papers

Macro Economics: Tax Reduction

Macro Economics: Tax Reduction.

Question:

Describe about the  Macro Economics for Tax Reduction?
 
 

Answer:

Tax reduction by the government is a form of ‘expansionary fiscal policy’. With tax cut by the government, consumers have more disposable income. This means less money paid to the tax authority i.e. more money in the pockets of consumers, leading to increased spending and less saving. The output equation becomes:

Y=C(Y-T) +I+G+NX

Where, Y=Output, C=Consumption spending, I=Investment spending, G= Govt. spending, NX=Net exports, T=Tax.

Tax cut evokes positive shocks to aggregate demand. The long-run aggregate supply curve shifts outward because the natural rate of output rises. This spending results in greater supply, which means suppliers need to hire more employees or pay overtime and higher wages to existing ones to motivate them to produce more. This in turn creates new jobs and higher wages and yet higher total disposable income in the economy, further increasing aggregate demand.

Short-run analysis:

In the short run, there will be an outward shift of the aggregate demand curve. The real income and price will increase. It shifts the long-run aggregate supply curve outward because the natural rate of output rises. Short run aggregate supply is unchanged.

Lon-run analysis:

Lon-run analysis

Tax cuts, in the long run, will shift aggregate supply to the right. Prices will fall. Truth is tax cut produces a very small increase in aggregate supply & relatively large increase in aggregate demand. In long period, output is essentially determined by aggregate supply & price by the movement of aggregate demand relative to the movement of aggregate supply. In the long run, shifts in aggregate demand affect the overall price level but do not affect output.

Fisherian equation states,

Real interest rate (r) =Nominal interest rate (n) –Expected inflation rate (i)

Thus,  

Or, n= (5/100) + (8/100)

Or, n= (5+8)/100

Or, n =13/100

Therefore, required n=0.13                                 

“Stagflation” means ‘stagflation’ plus ‘inflation’. It is a sustained period of both high inflation leading to high price rise and unemployment leading to slow economic growth. We now interpret this as resulting from price shocks, which affect aggregate supply. 

A three week lag was there between Federal Reserve policy meeting and the minutes release of that meeting. No, there was no consensus by officials on raising short-term interest rates in June as several officials thought June would be the right time to raise rates, others thought it would be better to wait longer and some thought the Fed might need to wait until 2016. Fed would raise rates when there would be further improvement in the labor market & inflation would rise to 2% target. They would temporarily remove the imposed cap on new instruments known as ‘overnight reverse repos’. It could be too early to raise the rates, failing which would need to reverse course on rates. Exports could fall down due to appreciation of dollar.

Three reasons why Fed could delay raising rates in June are:

Ø  Anticipating improvement in labor market& inflation to rise to 2% target.Ø  Raising rates too much too soon could weaken the economy & could then be forced to reverse course on rates.Ø  Appreciation of dollar would mean restrain in US net exports.Two reasons not to delay are:Ø  To move up away from zero floorØ  Dollar rose to 20% in the past years. The increase has already had some of the effects on the economy that higher interest rates would produce, including slowing growth and lower inflation.

FED increases interest rates mainly to combat inflation (i.e. bring price stability) & to avoid too much growth (i.e. to reach a level of sustainable economic growth.).  Higher rates mean less disposable income for consumers. So, Savings goes up & spending goes down.  As inflation rises, consumers & producers will cut back on spending. Prices go up when demand is greater than supply. This leads to fall in demand. This means the producers would cut down their production due to less demand. Less production means number of workers will be reduced by the producer leading to unemployment.

Factors leading to recession are:

drop in real wages; sharp decline in retail, devaluation. The external causes leading to recession in Russia are, fall in world oil prices and western sanctions imposed on Russia are the external causes.

Brisk action not taken by the central bank in taking action against persistent falling ruble.

One Monetary policy action is “lowering rates.

One Fiscal policy action is increasing govt. spending.”

The practical problems with the implementation of monetary policy is that “saving will be discouraged. Thus, savers see a decline in income because they receive lower income payments.”

The practical problem with the implementation of fiscal policy is that “it is at the expense of private sector spending and is therefore potentially harmful to some firms.”

Macro Economics: Tax Reduction

Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount.

Simple Steps to get your Paper Done
For Quality Papers