Discussion 1 As you work on your capstone project proposal, you may want to share your progress with your peers and instructor and seek or provide guidance or share insights. By Week 1, Day 2, go to the Discussion Area and post responses to the discussion question. All responses should be posted to the appropriate topic in this Discussion Area. It is important to support what you say with relevant citations in the APA format from both the course materials and outside resources. Include the South University online library in your research activities utilizing not only the nursing resource database, but also those pertaining to education, business, and human resources. Be objective, clear, and concise. Always use constructive language. All comments should be posted to the appropriate topic in this Discussion Area. Discussion Question Melynk and Fineout-Overholt (2011) note that there are seven steps to the evidence-based practice (EBP) process. The first step is to cultivate a spirit of inquiry. To encourage this spirit of inquiry, you are asked in this discussion to: •Identify a problem or issue from within your specialty area that you feel needs to be improved upon. The Doctor of Nursing Practice site (http://www.doctorsofnursingpractice.org/resources/dnp-scholarly-projects/) provides many examples of these projects. The list below may help focus your thoughts. ◦Educational program ◦Evidence-based healthcare policy change ◦Evidence-based clinical issue or protocol for specific disease/condition •Discuss the relevance of the issue from your perspective (not the literature at this juncture) in relation to your selected advanced role option. ◦What piqued your interest about this issue or problem? ◦How does it relate to your area of specialization? ◦What gave you the idea that evidence exists to support this change? See “note” below. ◦Provide a rationale as to why this will be an evidence-based project to improve outcomes and not generate new evidence (research). Please remember that the project will not be implemented during this course and no data will be collected. The outcome of this course is to complete a project proposal only. Note: To avoid false starts and wasted effort, it is important that you approach this week with some idea that your idea for proposed change has some research evidence to support that change. You may want to take a cursory look at the literature, have an informal discussion with classmates or colleagues in your specialty area, or ask your classmates in this week’s discussion for ideas. Take the time to do some background searching and reflecting to pinpoint your areas of interest so those you ask for assistance are not starting from scratch.
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount.
Criterion 1 Identifies an appropriate and relevant nursing topic that reflects uncertainty of best practice and links it to a practice priority
Criterion 2 Explains how evidence based practice will lead to effective clinical decision making related to the topic.
Criterion 3 Designs a searchable clinical question using a recognised clinical question formula
Criterion 4 Provides evidence of a systematic literature search strategy and transferred to appropriate databases
Criterion 5 Communicates the effectiveness of sourcing a minimum of 5 research papers to inform the evidence base using academic writing and accurate referencing
Task length 2000 words .
Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount.
Magnet & Pathway to Excellence certification Topic: Magnet & Pathway to Excellence certification Question: What is Magnet designation?
Rubric: Format: Use APA format to cite references. No title page necessary. Be cautious of casual conversation, colloquialisms, or other vernacular.
References: You must post at least one reference from a peer reviewed nursing or healthcare journal. Venues used by the general public (i.e., WebMD) are not acceptable resources. The article should be published within the last 10 years. Textbooks may be used as 2nd, 3rd, etc. resources/references, however, NOT as your primary or ONLY reference.
Post & Response Guidelines: • Initial Posts should be 250-500 words (3 paragraph minimum) o Recall that paragraphs typically contain 3 or more sentences
All initial posts should include: • Introduction of topic and specific question • Relevance to contemporary Professional Nursing practice • Historical (or future) context • Its relationship to Safety, Quality, Human Experience, Financial Implications, Use of resources (supplies or people), etc. if applicable • What does the literature reflect on the issue? Best and worst case scenarios • Potential outcomes of “opposite action” (not doing what the literature recommends)? • Evidence of gaps in current practice and/or opportunities for improvement • Summarize information
Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount.
Reconceptualizing Program Outcomes and Leveling EBP Content for Undergraduate Nursing Students.Read “Reconceptualizing Program Outcomes” and “Leveling EBP Content for Undergraduate Nursing Students” for a better understanding of issues within curriculum development. Read “Reconceptualizing Program Outcomes” and “Leveling EBP Content for Undergraduate Nursing Students” for a better understanding of issues within curriculum development.
Select an issue within curriculum development that is of interest to you.
Write a paper of 1,100 words on the issue, discussing its affect and relevance to nursing, staff or patient education.
Why is this issue a problem at your place of employment? What are your proposed strategies to resolve these issues? Use at least three to five scholarly, peer-reviewed resources less than 5 years old in addition to the course materials. Make sure that you do not use the two sources given in this assignment. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. An abstract is required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.
Curriculum Development Issue Paper
Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount.
Use the concept of relevance to defend New Century’s policy of recognizing revenue as it securitized and sold mortgages. What was the policy’s major weakness? (5 marks)
Outline a more conservative accounting policy for New Century’s mortgage sale transactions. Consider both statement of financial position and net income effects of your policy. (Hint: Read Theory in Practice 8.3, textbook, p. 314.) (4 marks)
New Century Financial Corp., formed in 1995, was a large mortgage lender in the United States. Many of these mortgages were securitized and transferred to investors. New Century accounted for the proceeds of these securitizations as sales. However, New Century committed to buy back mortgages that became troubled within up to a year after transfer.
New Century would retain some mortgages for itself (called retained interests), from which it would receive future cash flows. Also, the transfer agreements included the right to service the mortgages, for which New Century charged a fee. New Century valued these retained interests and servicing rights at current value, based on their discounted expected future cash flows. Thus, revenue from retained interests was recognized at the time of retention, and servicing revenue was recognized at the time of mortgage transfer. These policies required numerous estimates, as compared to a more conservative policy of recognizing revenues as cash flows (when retained interests were received and when servicing responsibilities were rendered).
The company’s share price increased dramatically, to a high of US$64 in 2004. Its reported net income reached $1.4 billion in 2005.
However, New Century seriously underestimated the extent of its mortgage buybacks and resulting credit losses. Of $40 billion of mortgages granted in the first three quarters of 2006, it provided only $13.9 million for buybacks. Investor concerns about increasing buybacks rose in 2006 as the 2007–2008 market meltdowns approached. These buyback concerns added to concerns about early revenue recognition from retained interests and servicing. Also, the company failed to write down its retained interests as the current value of the underlying mortgages decreased.
New Century was soon unable to borrow money to finance mortgage buybacks. Its shares lost 90% of their value, and the company was delisted from the New York Stock Exchange. In April 2007, it filed for bankruptcy protection.
New Century’s auditor (KPMG) was drawn into the lawsuits that followed. KPMG denied liability, claiming that the provisions for buybacks were deemed adequate at the time and blaming New Century’s failure on the market meltdowns of 2007–2008. In December 2009, the SEC filed civil fraud charges against three former executives of New Century, seeking damages and return of bonuses. Several other lawsuits followed. In November 2010, financial media reported final settlement of a class action lawsuit that included a payment of over $65 million by former company officers and directors, and a payment of $44.75 million by auditor KPMG.
Required:
Use the concept of relevance to defend New Century’s policy of recognizing revenue as it securitized and sold mortgages. What was the policy’s major weakness? (5 marks)
Outline a more conservative accounting policy for New Century’s mortgage sale transactions. Consider both statement of financial position and net income effects of your policy. (Hint: Read Theory in Practice 8.3, textbook, p. 314.) (4 marks)
Use two characteristics of investor behaviour based on psychology to explain the rapid rise in New Century’s share price. Be sure to identify the specific behavioural characteristics you draw on in your answer. (8 marks)
Despite your answer in part (c), is the rapid rise in New Century’s share price necessarily inconsistent with (semi-strong) securities market efficiency? Explain. (4 marks)
Note that retained interests meet the definition of a financial instrument. How would these financial instruments be accounted for under IAS 39? (4 marks)
Question 2 (25 marks)
Efficient securities market theory has long been under attack from behavioural finance, which draws on behavioural theories of investor behaviour to explain why security prices do not always behave as the economic theories of rational investing and market efficiency predict. These attacks have increased since the 2007–2008 security market meltdowns.
Required:
Explain why prospect theory predicts that security prices will differ from their prices under efficient security markets theory. (8 marks)
Describe two accounting-related efficient securities market anomalies and explain why each is an anomaly. (8 marks)
The efficient securities market anomalies suggest that investors underreact to the full information content of financial statements. Choose one behavioural theory that predicts this underreaction and explain why it predicts underreaction. (4 marks)
Should accountants be concerned that the importance of financial reporting may decline if behaviourally biased investors do not use all the information in the financial statements? Explain. (5 marks)
Place this order or similar order and get an amazing discount.
Describe the relevance of the nursing research problem addressed in a SRR to practice..
Critique of Systematic Research Review (SRR) Guidelines with Scoring Rubric Purpose The purpose of this assignment is to provide students with practice in identifying, reading, and critiquing systematic research reviews related to nursing. A systematic review is defined as “A summary of evidence, typically conducted by an expert or expert panel on a particular topic, that uses a rigorous process (to minimize bias) for identifying, appraising, and synthesizing studies to answer a specific clinical question and draw conclusions about the data gathered (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2011, p. 582).
Course Outcomes Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to (CO 3) Synthesize for dissemination the research findings from nursing and related disciplines. (PO 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11)
(CO 4) Compare and critique quantitative and qualitative designs and methodologies for research studies. (PO 4, 7, 9, 11)
Due Date: Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 5 Total Points Possible: 175 Points REQUIREMENTS: 1. Describe the relevance of the nursing research problem addressed in a SRR to practice. (CO 3, 6) 2. Critique the levels of evidence of the studies used in the SRR, specifically the designs of the studies included. (CO 6) 3. Critique the clarity with which the studies are presented and critiqued. (CO 6) 4. Describe the overall findings of the studies, as summarized in the SRR. (CO 3, 6) 5. Critique the conclusions of the SRR, with implications for your current practice and future research. (CO 3, 6) 6. Utilize the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews to locate a true SRR for this assignment. 7. Paper length should be between 4-6 pages. PREPARING THE PAPER Consult your faculty member if you are uncertain about whether your article is a true SRR. If it is not, your grade will be affected because you will not be able to address all of the above objectives.
Important: Submit a copy of the systematic research review that you are critiquing as a separate document before submitting your paper. This will help Turnitin from returning a high similarity percentage on your written work. Remember to keep Turnitin similarity to 24% or less or you will be deducted points on APA.
References
Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2011). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott, Williams, & Wilkins.
TURNITIN® This assignment will be submitted to Turnitin. You learned about Turnitin in your NR500 course, so you should be familiar with how to access it. Additionally, you will find an instructional announcement about Turnitin® in the course and in the Student Handbook.
Category Points % Description Describes the relevance of the research problem addressed in the SRR to practice. 25 14.28 Fully describes the relevance of the research problem Critiques the research rigor of the studies used in the SRR (see lesson’s levels of evidence). 25 14.28 Fully critiques the rigor of the studies used in the SRR Critiques the levels of evidence, specifically the designs of the studies included in the SRR. 25 14.28 Fully critiques the levels of evidence of the studies included in the SRR Critiques the clarity with which the studies are presented and critiqued. 25 14.28 Fully describes the clarity with which the studies are presented and critiqued Describes the overall findings of the studies, as summarized in the SRR. 25 14.28 Fully describes the overall findings of the studies summarized in the SRR Critiques the conclusions of the SRR, with implications for your current practice and future research 25 14.28 Critiques the conclusions of the SRR, with implications for current practice and future research Grammar, punctuation, and spelling reflect format written work. 10 5.71 Grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with rules for formal written work. APA formatting 10 5.71 APA formatting is correct Submit a copy of the systematic research article you are critiquing. 5 2.85 Submits a copy or pdf of the systematic research article that you are critiquing 175 100% A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.
GRADING RUBRIC Assignment Criteria Exceptional (100%) Outstanding or highest level of performance Exceeds (88%) Very good or high level of performance Meets (80%) Competent or satisfactory level of performance Needs Improvement (38%) Poor or failing level of performance Developing (0) Unsatisfactory level of performance Content Possible Points = 125 Points
Describes the relevance of the research problem addressed in the SRR to practice. 25 Points 22 Points 20 Points 10 Points 0 Points Fully describes the relevance of the research problem. Describes the relevance of the research problem but does elaborate fully on the relevance of the research problem The research problem and its relevance are presented but not elaborated. Describes the relevance of the research problem very briefly. Does not describe the relevance of the research problem Critiques the research rigor of the studies used in the SRR (see lesson’s levels of evidence). 25 Points 22 Points 20 Points 10 Points 0 Points Fully critiques the rigor and levels of evidence of the studies used in the SRR. Critiques the rigor and levels of evidence of the studies used in the SRR but occasional information is missing. Critiques the rigor and levels of evidence of the studies used in the SRR with brief critique States the rigor and levels of evidence but does not provide critique Does not critique the rigor or levels of evidence of the studies used in the SRR Critiques the levels of evidence specifically the designs of the studies included in the SRR 25 Points 22 Points 20 Points 10 Points 0 Points Fully critiques the levels of evidence of the studies used in the SRR. Critiques the levels of evidence of the studies used in the SRR but occasional information is missing. Critiques the levels of evidence of the studies used in the SRR but critique is brief. States the levels of evidence of the studies used in the SRR or critique is very brief. No critique provided Critiques the clarity with which the studies are presented and critiqued. 25 Points 22 Points 20 Points 10 Points 0 Points Fully describes the clarity with which the studies are presented and critiqued. Describes the clarity with which the studies are presented and critiqued with occasional missing information. Describes the clarity with which the studies are presented and critiqued with brief elaboration. Barely describes the clarity with which the studies are presented and critiqued. Does not describe the clarity with which the studies are presented and critiqued. Describes the overall findings of the studies, as summarized in the SRR. 25 Points 22 Points 20 Points 10 Points 0 Points Fully describes the overall findings of the studies summarized in the SRR. Describes the overall findings of the studies summarized in the SRR with occasional missing information. Describes the overall findings of the studies summarized in the SRR with missing information and brief elaboration. Partially describes the overall findings of the studies summarized in the SRR. Does not describe the overall findings of the studies summarized in the SRR.
Critiques the conclusions of the SRR, with implications for your current practice and future research. 25 Points 22 Points 20 Points 10 Points 0 Points Critiques all of the conclusions of the SRR, with implications for current practice and future research. Critiques most of the conclusions of the SRR, with implications for current practice and future research. Critiques some of the conclusions of the SRR, with implications for current practice and future research. Barely critiques the conclusions of the SRR or only examined implications for current practice or future research. Does not critique the conclusions of the SRR, with implications for current practice or future research Content Subtotal______/150 points Format Possible Points = 25 Points Uses appropriate grammar, syntax, and spelling. 10 Points 9 Points 8 Points 4 Points 0 Points No errors in grammar, syntax, or spelling 1-2 errors in grammar, syntax, or spelling 3-4 errors in grammar, syntax, or spelling 5 or more errors in grammar, syntax, or spelling 6 or more errors in grammar, syntax, or spelling APA 6th edition 10 Points 9 Points 8 Points 4 Points 0 Points No APA 6th edition errors 1-2 APA 6th edition errors 3-4 APA 6th edition errors 5 APA 6th edition errors 6 or more APA 6th edition errors OR Turnitin similarity percentage on student written work is higher than 24%. Submit a copy of the systematic research article you are critiquing. 5 Points 0 Points Submits a copy of the systematic research review Does not submit a copy of the systematic research review
Critically analyse the patient assessment findings taking into consideration the person’s situation and medical diagnosis. Discuss the data/information collected and process that information in terms of relevance to their nursing care using DRABC ( danger response airway breathing circulation).
Nursing caring and inquiry: foundational Paper, Order, or Assignment Requirements
Critically analyse the patient assessment findings, taking into consideration the person’s situation and medical diagnosis. Discuss the data/information collected and process that information in terms of relevance to their nursing care using DRABC ( danger, response, airway, breathing, circulation) (10 marks)
Identify three (3) nursing diagnoses for this person; One of which must address the client’s psycho-social needs.
The nursing diagnoses must be discussed in order of priority (e.g.: what nursing diagnosis should be addressed first and why).
You must also establish one patient centred goal for each nursing diagnosis. (5 marks)
For each nursing diagnosis, discuss the specific nursing interventions (what you would do and why) that would be appropriate. Each intervention must include detailed rationale (why you did what you did) and specific evaluation criteria (how will you know if the intervention was successful).
Demonstrate a detailed and accurate understanding of one clearly defined topic of relevance to current nursing practise.
Demonstrate a detailed and accurate understanding of one clearly defined topic of relevance to current nursing practise
ATTITUDE OF NURSES TO THE CARE OF THE DEMENTED QUESTION: WHAT ARE THE ATTITUDE OF NURSES TO THE CARE OF THE DEMENTED? Dissertation- Write a critical literature review on the selected topic. The dissertation must meet the requirements of the learning outcomes.
Learning Outcomes are: .Demonstrate a detailed and accurate understanding of one clearly defined topic of relevance to current nursing practise 2. search, access and critically appraise literature relevant to the defined topic. 3. Synthesise the literature relating to the selected topic using an appropriate framework. 4. Evaluate the relevance and significance of the literature. 5. Make recommendations for nursing practice based on the extensive literature review.
GUIDELINES FOR WRITING DISSERTATION Title page, Abstract (approximately 250), Introduction, Literature Review, search strategy, Results of the literature search and discussion of findings, Recommendation for practice, conclusion, Reference List Havard Style, Appendix.
At least 40 references but critically analysis of about five recent journals.
Describe the relevance to nursing practice Summarize the findings from the articles.
Describe the relevance to nursing practice Summarize the findings from the articles
Antiretroviral therapy (ART) for treating HIV pregnant women Describe the relevance to nursing practice Summarize the findings from the articles Describe at least one nursing practice that is supported by the evidence in the articles Justify your position that a specific nursing practice is supported or recommended for change with at least two specific ¦Â Continue readingAntiretroviral therapy (ART) for treating HIV pregnant women
Describe the relevance of those concepts to your advancing nursing knowledge and practice..
Describe the relevance of those concepts to your advancing nursing knowledge and practice.
Week 5: Application of Borrowed Theories to Advanced Nursing Practice
Explicate a selected borrowed theory that you already know or one that you read about in this week’s lecture, readings or other materials. Provide an example of how this theoretical perspective has been used to frame nursing knowledge, care or leadership in any healthcare setting.
List the concepts that constitute the theory and
Describe the relevance of those concepts to your advancing nursing knowledge and practice.
In other words, you would not describe Maslow’s theory as it relates to an entry-level, new graduate nursing assessment, but you could consider how an advanced practice nurse, working on his or her doctoral degree would use that theory to improve patient outcomes, quality, and safety, access or cost.
Similarly, you could talk about how using Albert Bandura’s Self Efficacy concept facilitates more effective intervention in smoking cessation initiatives.
