Honesty Is the Best Policy Essay

Honesty Is the Best Policy Essay.

Like truth goodness and justice, honesty is a virtue. A good person is always honest, and tells the truth. We must form a habit of honesty. It plays in both the worlds. Honest deeds are always rewarded that should not be measured in terms of money. A person following good deeds is always contended and satisfied. It is true that a person in practicality of life but he does not deviate from the path of honesty and remains peaceful and contented in the hardships of life.

Respected persons and trusted personalities are always to be trusted upon. It is the sign of moral courage. Without truthfulness the world will be dirty place to live in. It is said that truth is always singular. An action cannot be true (honest) and false at the same time. False hood or telling lies writes down a person. He or she loses faith. No body believes him or honors him. Honesty is the mark of honor and good will so we must be honest in thoughts and actions.

Corruption, bribery, black marketing, smuggling and cheating are bad and dis-honest acts. Dis-honesty leads to vulgarity, which is devilish deed. A dishonest person is never believed and as such loss his confidence. We must be honest by heart and with the depth of soul. A man of dead conscience is a person of bad character. He does not have any fear of accountability. An honest man is always successful in his practical as well as spiritual life. His views are always positive because he knows that the problematic sufferings of life are temporary and the troubles of age wiped out with the passage of time.

Honesty is a fundamental factor, which builds the character of a person. It is a precious element, which keeps the shoulders of a person guiltiness and free from criminal thoughts. It keeps determination in right direction.

The personality of such an honest man is graceful and dignified. The command of Almighty Allah is inscribed on the screen of mind. The spirit of truth and crystal honesty profoundly pierced in the consciousness of an honest man.

Honesty Is the Best Policy Essay

Illusion Vs Reality : street car named Desire Essay

Illusion Vs Reality : street car named Desire Essay.

The play “A street car named Desire” by Tennessee Williams is a play that explores different characterizations in the society, by using three prime characters Stanley, Blanche, and Stella. Stanley is a person who lives in the realm of reality while Blanche seeks to live in a fantasy world. Stella is person who is deceived by Blanche’s illusions but comes back to reality when Stanley acts as a mirror and reflects all that Blanche loathes about herself.

The characters in the play hide from their reality by acting as if the events they went through didn’t happen or were not important.

Norton Juster in his masterpiece “The phantom tollbooth” said “if something is there, you can only see it with your eyes open, but if it isn’t there, you can see it just as well with your eyes closed. That’s why imaginary things are often easier to see than real ones.

” Blanche chose a see something that is not there in order to hide from the present misfortune and past failures, which gave her happiness, peace and kindness than the real world.

Similarly when Blanche reveals the truth about the rape, Stella chose to believe in the fantasy and discard the truth by saying “I couldn’t go on believing her story and live with Stanley” (Stella 1862). Blanche may be a person who lives in an unrealistic world. She lied and hid the truth but she never tried to hide the truth.

She always believed in the best of anyone she loves, and believe them incapable of cruelty. This can be evident as she says “Deliberate cruelty is not forgivable. It is the one unforgivable thing in my opinion and it is the one thing of which I have never, never been guilty. ”(Blanche 1859). Blanche knows what part of her story is illusion, and Stanley sees through it all. This eventually leads to the implicating moment. Stella reacts in an interesting manner in this scene.

She says “I couldn’t go on believing her story and live with Stanley” (Stella 1862) on knowing the truth. She resolved the conflict that is going through her soul in the only way possible. As Blanche reveals the truth about the rape, Stella either has to believe her and leave Stanley or consider Blanches story as a part of her illusion. Even though Stella knows that Blanche was speaking out the reality, she followed the principles of illusion over reality in order to continue living the life she had before Blanche’s arrival.

Living in Illusions in the present day is very common. We consume a lot of lies daily. The key to happiness lies in how we show ourselves to the world. Celebrities who come from humble backgrounds are shown as proof that anyone can be adored by the world. For example the flamboyant lives of celebrities and the outrageous characters on television, movies, professional wrestling and sensational talk shows are promoted to us, promising to fill up the emptiness in our own lives.

However it is cultivating a self-sustaining cycle that drives the frustrated and alienated individual with even greater desperation and hunger away from reality, back towards the empty promises of those who seduce us, who tell us what we want to hear. The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the steady deterioration of the dollars, the climbing unemployment, the melting of the polar ice caps and the awful reality that makes us run out of money doesn’t fit into the cheerful happy talk that we maintain in our day to day life.

The worse things get, the more we beg for fantasy. Escaping the reality and living in a fantasy world will leave oneself blind to the things around us. In some cases, if we are strong enough to withhold from the fantasy and illusions around us, we may end up in the reality, like Mitch. Both Stella and Blanche found it best in their minds to live in a fantasy but if you live in it too long it can take over your reality.

Illusion Vs Reality : street car named Desire Essay

Illusion vs. Reality Essay Essay

Illusion vs. Reality Essay Essay.

A universal theme found in Fahrenheit 451, The Truman Show, and Plato’s Republic is we accept the reality with which we are presented. The characters portrayed this theme through perceived reality vs. actuality, knowledge is power, and knowledge can only be gained if it is presented to it first. In all three, there are people without knowledge and people with knowledge. The people that don’t have knowledge are the general public, Truman, and the prisoners; the people with the knowledge are the government, Christof, and the things causing the shadows in the cave.

The people without the knowledge live their lives as if they know everything while the people with knowledge try to either keep it that way or them the knowledge. Reality vs. actuality helps portray the theme though the people without the knowledge, who have his/her own reality while the actual world is something different. In Fahrenheit 451, the general public live their lives believing books are evil while they are actually not.

In The Truman Show, Truman lives his life as if it is real, but it is a lie that was created for a TV show.

In Plato’s Republic, the prisoners were born into a reality where shadows are their whole world, while the objects making the shadows were passing by. In all three, the reality shown to the people are not what the actual world is. Reality vs. actuality shows how the theme is portrayed in Fahrenheit 451, The Truman Show, and Plato’s Republic. Another thing that helps display the theme is knowledge is power. The people who have the knowledge either use that power to keep the reality that the people without the knowledge already have or try to give them knowledge.

The government in Fahrenheit 451 use firemen to try and keep the reality that books are evil and make that the truth to the general public. Christof and all the staff members in The Truman Show have the power and use actors to keep Truman’s fabricated world the “truth”. In Plato’s Republic the prisoners did not believe the philosopher who tried to give them knowledge and unveil the truth. The prisoners believe in their reality too much so to them, knowledge are the shadows and that kept them under the truth. The people without knowledge are kept under their reality because knowledge can only be gained if presented it first.

The people are never presented with knowledge, so they could never learn about the truth. Since the government tell lies, it prevents the general public to read books, and the general public never finds out the truth behind books. Truman never found out the actual world until he was presented with knowledge by his first love. Christof and the actors tried their best to prevent Truman from finding out the truth, but in the end they fail. In Plato’s Republic the philosopher tried to present the prisoners the real world, but the prisoners rejected him and continued to believe in the shadows.

The theme, we accept the reality with which we are presented, has been portrayed by reality vs. actuality, knowledge is power, and knowledge can only be gained if it is presented to it first. All of the people without knowledge had their own reality that was not the actual truth. The people with knowledge had the power and tried to keep the realities for the people without knowledge. The general public, Truman , and the prisoners did not gain knowledge unless first presented with it. If the general public read the books, and if the prisoners did believe the philosopher, then everyone would have knowledge and there would not be a fake reality.

You may also be interested in the following: dichotomy definition literature

Illusion vs. Reality Essay Essay

Universal Truth Essay

Universal Truth Essay.

Alexander Pope was a living paradox and he portrayed it in An Essay on Man and The Rape of lock. Pope had a disease that caused him to be viewed as weak in society, while at the same time this weak man was also a genius. The truth behind Pope and the things he writes about is the idea that there is a common middle state between conflicting things humans have to deal with. Humans are always trying to find a balance.

The things that cause this balance to get disproportionate are having too much pride to act, letting your ego control yourself, and overreacting.

In An Essay on Man he says,”with too much knowledge for the skeptic side, with too much weakness for the stoic’s pride. ” The belief that you know you must get something done but you do not want to start because you think you will fail. In the form of competition particulary sports when a team is being beaten terribly by the opponent and they choose to give up instead of still trying to overcome there deficit.

It also applies to when a student has to do a difficult project and they are given a lot of time to do it. Most students do not start the project immediately because of the fear they will fail at there first attempt.

Also in the back of there mind though, is that they must get the project done and the longer they wait the less time they have. In An Essay on Man he states,”created half to rise, and half to fall;great lord of all things, yet a prey to all. ” the main idea that influences this idea is a persons ego. Nobody is meant to be perfect all the time in anything and there are up’s and down’s in everything difficulty wise. We are made as humans to be imperfect and it is those of us who can deal with the adversity of a situation and be able to work through it or let the change of the situation control you.

People are powerful beyond measure and if they allow themselves to let there mind control there actions it will take them to extraordinary places. Of all things great that make up a person and the things that we are capable of there are still things that can get under our skin and cause us to be weak. Any great athlete will tell you that they remember the journey more than the later success they had after there hard work. If someone is content with who they are and they do not let there ego control what they want to become it will allow them to be able to deal with adversity and not let any small thing dictate what they are capable of.

In The Rape of the Lock Pope states,”then flashed the living lightning from her eyes, and screams of horror rend th’ affrighted skies. Not louder shrieks to pitying heaven are cast, when husbands, or when lap dogs breathe their last; or when rich China vessels fallen from high. ” This is the reaction of Arabella when Robert cut a lock of her hair. This shows how much she over reacted to this minor thing and how this over reaction is a part of human nature. It is comparing her reaction to that of someone dying and how having her hair cut is that same feeling.

This all plays a role in Pope’s purpose in his life and his writing and that is to live in a middle state. The idea that you should be to extreme to either side of things in this case not reacting too much but also not reacting too little. Pope is trying to get across finding the fine line between things. Universal truth is an unalterable fact in humans that can be applied to everything. The truth is people get too caught up with what has happened and what is going to happen that they are not in a middle state of the present.

Being caught up in ones self worth is very demoralizing and can cause people be selfish when they should find a middle ground of thinking for others sometimes while at other times they do things for themselves. Not doing when you have to builds a certain pressure which leads you to forcing yourself to do something. Doing at all times, in a state of constant motion causes people to not let there pride get in the way. There are two extreme types of reactions one being overreacting and the other not reacting at all. Being able to react appropiately to a situation allows someone to live in a middle state.

Universal Truth Essay

Truth and Honesty Essay

Truth and Honesty Essay.

What does “honesty is the best policy” mean:
You should always tell the truth, even when it seems as if it would be useful to tell a lie.

Well-known honesty stories:
It was the favorite motto of America’s first President:
I hold the maxim no less applicable to public than to private affairs, that honesty is always the best policy. – George Washington

The moral of Aesop’s fable “Mercury and the Woodcutter,” a story about two woodcutters – one is honest, the other is not.

Honesty makes us brave and strong.
Honesty makes us brave and strong. We are not afraid of anybody or anything. Honesty could lead us to face some problems; nevertheless, we are loved and respected by others. Problems are cured themselves later thanks to the understanding of everyone on our situations.

Honesty is the best policy in relationships: Honesty builds up good relationship in family, marriage, friends… So, in close relationships, it is the best policy to be honest in every aspect of life.

People in close relationships are those who have many activities and practices with us in everyday life; consequently they easily find out what we have told them truths or lies in later short time. Reasons why they may detect the untrue are that we do not remember a lie we have given, then there appears a contradiction between what have been told and what we say later, and that they may get the fact through other people around.

People in close relationships, for examples family, close friends, colleagues…, are those who give us happiness and joys. Dishonesty can easily break the relationships, which then put us in sorrow, sadness and even regret for some time.

Dishonesty may shine for just a short time while honesty do for a great long time

Dishonesty may earn money, power and success. However, all these stay for just a short time. Dishonesty cannot face the fact itself. Honesty then shines to push dishonesty away. Honesty pays at the end; as a result, an honest man win a place in hearts of people, which make him successful. He can be remembered and respected even after his death.

Tell the whole truth or leave some of it in secret or use white lies Telling the whole truth, leaving some of it in secret or using white lies depend on each situation. Telling the truth is always a good policy. However, sometimes we find it difficult to uncover a secret, a fact or an idea; in these cases, silence is a best choice rather than telling out lies.

Using white lies is an art where a white-lie-teller should consider whether he should use it or not. Sometimes he should because the listeners accept it. In other cases, the listeners do not; then he should not although white lies are always great to hear. As a result, it is fine to say that a man should consider who the listener is, act in accordance with his own characteristics and his own values, and decide what to say depends on the situation.

Truth and Honesty Essay

Discoveries: Truth and Hand Grenade Essay

Discoveries: Truth and Hand Grenade Essay.

Individuals occasionally consciously block and repress discoveries in fear of the consequences, since they often highlight the most negative features of oneself and humanity. Therefore discoveries can definitely affect ones vision of the world as they can bring to surface what was intentionally unknown and allow one to view things in different ways. These expressions are conveyed through many texts, three of those most significant being John Foulcher’s 1983 poem ‘Martin and the Hand Grenade’ extracted from Light Pressure, James Bradley’s 1997 novel Wrack and Jason Russell’s globally acknowledged film in 2012, Kony 2012.

Within each of the three texts audiences are brought to the attention of issues such as power, imagination versus history and truth that help expose these points. There are several notions of power expressed through the three texts, for example within ‘Martin and the Hand Grenade’ the grenade is the main power source of the poem making each boy lose themselves in their own minds and within Wrack very significant powers such as the European’s are portrayed in order to uncover history’s roots and beginnings.

Kony 2012 also has many ideas of power within it but it also clearly underlays concepts of imagination versus history, where audiences are lead to understand that the destructive history being made by Joseph Kony at this moment is beyond ones imagination and beliefs. The biggest factor of truth within each of the texts assists deeply in portraying the statement ‘Discoveries can affect our vision of the world’, as one is brought to see behind the exterior of what is currently known by everyone.

It also reinforces the fact that people refuse to acknowledge the truth since it can present one with the most destructive aspects of humanity. Within ‘Martin and the Hand Grenade’, John Foulcher explains the state of the boys’ minds whilst present with the hand grenade. Since it is within their own grasp, the boys come to imagine the brutal realities of the war, in comparison to their previous conceptions where it was a fun game when they were young.

As the boys discover the power the grenade holds, their perceptions of the world gradually change to comprehend the violence it depicts. Some would say the reason why they are suddenly realising the truths at the sight of the grenade is not because they did not know these truths, but instead they were consciously unrecognising them in order to repress the negative aspects of humanity; how violence and death are very real in this world. Foulcher cleverly depicts this message through symbolism and his class’s reactions, “And each boy holds the small war”.

Discoveries: Truth and Hand Grenade Essay

The Importance of Truth-Telling Essay

The Importance of Truth-Telling Essay.

Telling the truth is something that comes up for the majority of us in childhood. It is considered impolite to lie and when a lie was told, or you were untruthful, it was often considered a reflection of your parents’ moral attitudes. Unfortunately, we all seem to have been taught differently the exact nature of a truth or lie and the right or wrong way to use that information. In To Lie or Not to Lie? – The Doctor’s Dilemma (2007), the topic of truth versus lies by doctors specifically, is discussed.

While I believe it is important for doctors to be truthful in their dealings with patients, the 5 W’s need to be explored: what and to whom is truth, how and when are doctors choices for truth-telling determined and why it is important for them to tell the truth to their patients. Truth: “conformity to fact or reality” according to the Canadian Oxford Dictionary, does not appear in society to be that concrete.

From childhood we were taught about the importance of truth with the consequences of our actions meted out if we were not truthful.

Often our understanding of this subject was not the same as ”Johnny’s” next door and we were left with this confusing amalgamation, forced to gage for ourselves on a situational basis how much was lie or truth in any given statement. Society’s opinion on this topic therefore is varied based on our own individual ethics developed over the years. Doctors, held to far higher standards than the rest of us, are forced to play ‘God’ with their patients, although the Uncertainty principle “suggests that there is no certainty in health care, therefore no ‘absolute truth’ to reveal.

‘Truth-telling can never be achieved. ” (Tuckett, 2004, p. 500). In his determinations a doctor “must be careful to distinguish the notion of ‘truth’ as ‘the way things really are’ (so-called objective truth) from that of ‘truth’ as ‘the way a person believes things to be’. ” (Tuckett, 2004, p. 508). TRUTH-TELLING 3 The Importance of Truth-Telling The American College of Physicians Ethics Manual influences decision making by doctors via principles. Although these principles “do not provide ordered rules, these principles can help doctors and other health care workers to make decisions when reflecting on moral issues that arise at work. ” (Gillon, 1994, p. 184).

Respect for Autonomy, one of these guiding principles used in most of the decisions with long term disabilities or terminal illnesses, acknowledges a “persons right to hold views, to make choices” and to take actions…” (Shahidi, 2010, p. 590). Medical Ethics are in place to create a balance between all versions of ‘truth’ and provide structure for the relationship between doctor and patient, as well to provide guidance for the doctor and protect the rights of the patient.

Because truth is not black and white like we sometimes wish to think the doctor can use this framework to foster an honest and trusting relationship with his patients. The consequences can be long lasting if the truth is not told to patients in a timely fashion or in its entirety. Illness can get away from you quickly with no chance to turn back the clock or simply the chance to make amends to facilitate a peaceful exit. Doctors deceiving patients, whether by omission or by using semi-truths, erodes trust in that relationship (Tuckett, 2004).

By not being honest with a patient diagnosis they may cause the patient undue hardship as according to Mitchell, ”Patients with false information or no information about their condition may unintentionally mislead other physicians involved in their treatment” (Shahidi, 2010, p. 592). Lying also strips “the patient’s ability to be autonomous and fails to show respect for persons. ” While “truth-telling maintains the competent patient’s status as an adult”. (Tuckett, 2004, p. 505). TRUTH-TELLING 4 The Importance of Truth-Telling.

Maintaining the patients welfare should be the primary goal of a doctor while he is determining exactly just how to address the truth-telling. One of the principles under medical ethics is ’above all do no harm’. The long lasting consequences of choosing which ‘truth’ to tell could call into question this principle. We have determined that truth is not as cut and dried as we would like it to be, but there still needs to be a focus on honesty, truthfulness, and full disclosure with doctors and their patients.

Our health is a joint effort, and we need to be able to rely on and trust our medical professionals to let us know what really is happening. I believe that the least amount of harm in the long run would be in telling the complete truth, however I understand that we are all different and our situations are different and it then stands to reason that the solutions will all be different as well. By keeping in mind the who, what, where, when, why and even how, I think the acquisition of this information would give the best answer to each truth-telling situation.

The Importance of Truth-Telling Essay

Truth and Moral Propositions Essay

Truth and Moral Propositions Essay.

Absolutism- there are absolute truths and, especially, absolute moral truths to which all human beings must adhere if they are to be moral. Relativism- there are no absolute of any kind, but that everything, especially morality, is relative to specific cultures, groups or even individuals. Proposition- A meaningful statement that asserts or claims something about reality and that has the characteristics of being true or false. Truth- applies only to propositions. Describes state of affairs that was, that is, or will be actual.

Falsity- applies only to propositions. Describes a state of affairs that was not, that is not, or will not be actual. State of Affairs- an occurrence or situation that either is or is not actual. Anthropological facts cited in support of cultural absolutism and relativism is: Cultural absolutism 1) Similar moral principles exist in all societies. 2) People in all cultures have similar needs. 3) There are a great many similarities in situations and relationships existing in all cultures.

4) There are many similarities in sentiments, emotions, and attitudes.

Cultural relativism 1) There is extreme variation in customs, manners, taboos, religions, and so on, from culture to culture. 2) Moral beliefs and attitudes of human beings are learned essentially from their cultural environments. 3) People in different cultures tend to believe that their morality is the one true morality. The different types of propositions are: 1) Analytic Proposition.

These are truths that are known to be absolute because we know the definitions and meaning of words. 2) Internal Sense. These are propositions we know to be true merely because we have the experience. We alone truly know our own internal state. 3) External Sense. These are propositions that describe a state of affairs that occurs in the external world of which we have evidence through our external senses. 4) Moral Proposition. These are propositions about morality or those that have moral import.

Truth is absolute because it does not shift around depending upon belief, feelings, time, or even knowledge. We know for certain that Analytic and Internal State propositions are true because, Analytic propositions are truths known to be absolute and Internal State propositions can be known to be true in what John Hospers calls the strong sense of knowing if the latter fulfills the following requirements: 1) I must believe that the proposition must be true. 2) The proposition must actually be true. 3) I must have absolutely conclusive evidence that it is true.

I don’t think there are moral absolutes because to be absolute something must be complete and because different cultures have different views on what is moral there cannot be an absolute moral Moral propositions are propositions about morality or those that have moral import. They are different from other types of propositions because they cannot be known to be true or false because they are not facts. I believe that according to the facts stated by anthropologist on cultural relativism, that cultural relativist are correct in their assumptions an d that cultural absolutists are not completely correct.

Truth and Moral Propositions Essay

Reflection of Truth Essay

Reflection of Truth Essay.

Knowledge has a close relationship with truth as for belief to be knowledge, it must be true. Thus, it is necessary to understand the existence of truth in order to have a deeper understanding of knowledge. Therefore, this reflection will show the definition of “truth” for me and its characteristics in different culture or groups of people. “Truth” itself is defined as “success in inquiry” by John Randall. The definition may also mean “verification” and it comprises all the three definitions of truth presented by The Correspondence, Coherence and Pragmatic Theories of Truth.

The “success” means bringing scientific solution from the critical employment of the best method that we can develop to solve the “inquiry”, the world’s problems. Thus, the “success” is worked out “through action” (in Dewey’s words) and it fulfills the criteria of truth as an agreement with fact or reality in the Correspondence Theory of Truth. The success must also be verified by our previous body of knowledge as a success (or a solution) to a problem that will be acknowledged by the society who understands the problem in the long run.

Thus, the “Truth” corresponds to the Coherence Theory of Truth.

Lastly, the “truth’ brings useful and helpful solutions or answers to problems thus; it also renders the Pragmatic Theory of Truth to be a fulfilled criterion. Therefore, a true belief must give solutions or answers to people’s problems and is acceptable by the people’s body of knowledge, as well as, practical in their lives. An example of a true belief is a religion. The religion is a truth for a certain group of people who hold faith over the religion as it is acceptable by their knowledge formed through life experience. They also see the religion as the answers to their problems or questions about their existences in the world.

Hence, religion brings values or solutions to this group of people. It teaches them values that are accepted as facts such as “killing innocent people is a sin” and this correspondence of religion values to reality shows religion’s conformity to facts. Thus, truth may differ from one culture to another, as what may benefit or answer the problems of a specific group of people, may not be useful for another group. Religions are the example. The truth in Christian belief that heaven is the life after death do not synchronize with the truth in Buddhist saying that human keeps reincarnating until perfection is achieved.

Then, it is also understandable that all these “truths” based on religions can be true at the same time eventhough they may not be all true for a specific individual. However, there is also a possibility that all these “truths” are false. It happens when during an individual’s death, nothing spectacular like reincarnation or the opening of the Heaven’s Gates actually occurs as this argument renders religions, with its values, to be useless and not corresponding to the facts. Ultimately, the false truths (in this case the religions) can not be considered as truth anymore for, basically, they are not true.

The possibility of false truth to exist then arises a question of whether truth does actually exist or that there is no truth at all. If all truths are false then there is no truth anymore and if truths are relative from one group to another, is there an objective truth? For a “truth” as “verification” may be a mere lie invented by a group of people to influence others. Then, the verification is not a truth anymore for the inventors know the actual fact of the truth as a mere lie. Another argument is the fiction story in a book.

The story may be useful to the public or fulfill the criteria of the Three Theories of Truth but, still, people would never consider a fictional story as truth, would not they? The story may describe a factual incidence that can happen in a real life, give useful solutions or answers to the problems in life, as well as, introduce a new scientific theory that is relevant to our body of knowledge. However, can the story be accepted as a true story? A fictional story will remain a fantastic imagination of the writer only.

Thus, it is shown that the three Theories of Truth are flawed and so, is it appropriate to use them in determining what is the truth? Despite all these arguments, I still cannot claim that there is no truth. If I state that there is no truth, then, I would possess no knowledge for knowledge comes from true belief. Furthermore, without knowledge, what are the bases on which I put my arguments on claiming that there is no truth? I would only declare opinions which are unknown to myself because I have not even the slightest knowledge about those opinions.

Hence, I believe that there is truth for knowledge does exist. However, I can be certain that objective truth will never be achievable by human as we are social beings and our views are affected by each other. We also have feelings and emotions that will hinder us from obtaining the objective truth. The truth is relative to our societies. Moreover, as the three Theories of Truth are questionable, I believe that people cannot comprehend “truth” completely at this stage and so, perhaps, the journey in finding the real truth and knowledge is still a long way to go.

Reflection of Truth Essay

Truth is bitter better Essay

Truth is bitter better Essay.

Truth is the only weapon which can make a person win a battle. It is a pen that can write anything without anyone’s terror; it is a game in which who follows its one golden rule can never lose it; it is a tree that never loses its leaves; it is a river that cannot get filthy and dry in any season. Overall it can create heaven or else if not followed properly can ruin the whole world. It is said that to hide one lie we have to speak hundred more lies and that’s true.

A lie spoken intentionally means we need to speak several more lies to cover up that lie. And then also the truth comes out itself automatically.

Everything has two sides, positive as well as negative. A coin has positive side of triumph and negative side of disaster also. If a person wins then he may also lose someday. If happiness is there then sadness is obvious.

If a tree bear leaves then it also shed them. If one can stand then one can also fall. Taken as a whole, one can get to face anything in this whole world. Gandhiji said: ‘Lying is the mother of violence. ‘ And it is true. In our daily life, as an instance, we meet our relatives and if they hide anything from us by telling anything which is not true and later we come to know then we turn violent and more aggressive.

It leads to disrespect to the person. Truth was the only mother, father, son, daughter of the most widely known leader of the world- Gandhiji. He believed in truthfulness and he promoted its principle. And also it was obvious that for this single reason he was known worldwide. With this extraordinary weapon, he threw out the brutal and atrocious Britishers out of our country. He believed in the principle of Satyagraha which proved to be the most influential and imperative movement of the period. Gandhiji said:-

‘I have nothing new to teach the world. ‘ Truth and non- violence are as old as the hills. ‘ And this is true as truth and lie are not the new concepts that the world has. It is as old as even more then hills and mountains. No one can teach the world the art of speaking truth and plus of the lies. They come out from within our heart. According to me, Nelson Mandela can also undertaken as a person who followed truth and won the whole world the price of peace, equality and oneness. He being a ‘black’ became the president of ANC (African National Congress) and also he won the Nobel Prize for his greatest achievement.

He promoted equality among all the people on his principle that everyone is equal in the eyes of God. He was true in his outline as everyone is equal and equality in itself is also a truth. Also an example from our daily life, we are becoming more scientific these days but there are many people who still believe in superstitions. There are many misleading people who in the name of God hypnotize people in such a way that neither anyone comes to know about such thing nor the hypnotized is able to tell. But this is a bitter truth that those who follow anyone blindly have to face problems later in life.

Even the person doing such illegal and superfluous acts are always caught and they can’t make fool of people for long. A recent example is of the person who was called as guruji in Punjab- Sarasa. He was popularly known all around the world. He had separated salokas which had very less verses praising God and more of praising himself. But the problem was that whatever he was doing was wrong, whatever he was saying was lie, whatever acts he was committing were illegal! And surprisingly a member from his own crew told the media that something was wrong going on at his place.

Shockingly he used not to allow any of his disciple to talk to anyone because if they would do so then by chance if anyone else would hear it, then his acts would be held naked in the world and now this has happened, his popularity is decreasing also he is being disliked by the people now. This has not been the case in the present world but also during satyug (according to Hindu mythology) when Lord Rama were existing. He killed Ravana and placed truth over evil. He was cruel and so he did not win this battle of truth and evilness in spite of being so knowledgeable. This shows that truth wins and lies or evil faces disaster and fails.

But this is a fact that this yug is kalyug and in this yug is lies or evilness is given the same importance as it is given to truth. They are considered one and the same. For example in the case of Jessica Lal, it was first being kept aside and with false statements it was tried to conclude. False statements and evil methods were adopted to sole this matter quickly and quietly. But unfortunately this could not happen. Truth may be kept behind for years and years but one day itself it would come up and the liar will have to face problem for his mistake.

At last I would like to conclude that whatever be the case whether this or that we must not leave the path of truthfulness as this is the only way that would lead us to place which is as beautiful as heaven and the other way would lead us to a place like hell. It depends on us which way we opt. Finally by analysis of the history and of the present world we come to know that we cannot hide truth for long and cannot follow fakeness for long. Thus, truths always triumph! Satya Meva Jayati! As we say that ‘slow and steady wins the race’ we can say that ‘Truthful and honest wins the race. ‘

Truth is bitter better Essay