Call/WhatsAppText +1 (302) 613-4617

History

Turabian Citation Guide

TURABIAN REFERENCING  ·  NOTES-BIBLIOGRAPHY  ·  AUTHOR-DATE

Notes-Bibliography and Author-Date Formats Explained

How to use both Turabian systems — which one applies to your subject, how footnotes actually work, bibliography vs. reference list, and correct formatting for every source type students commonly cite.

20–24 min read Undergraduate & Postgraduate Students Turabian 9th Edition 4,200+ words
Custom University Papers Academic Writing Team
Turabian citation guidance based on Turabian’s A Manual for Writers of Research Papers, Theses, and Dissertations (9th edn., 2018), with coverage of both the notes-bibliography and author-date systems, source-type formatting, and the practical differences from Chicago style that students actually need to know.

Turabian has two systems. That is the thing most students miss. They look up “Turabian format,” copy a footnote template, and assume they are done. They are not — because if their subject uses author-date, they needed parenthetical citations and a reference list, not footnotes. Picking the wrong system is not a small formatting slip. It is a structural error that runs through every citation in the paper. This guide tells you which system applies to you, how each one works, and exactly how to format every source type you will likely encounter.

Notes-Bibliography Author-Date Footnotes & Endnotes Bibliography Books & Chapters Journal Articles Websites Primary Sources Ibid. & Short Forms Turabian vs Chicago 9th Edition Dissertations & Theses

What Turabian Is — and How It Relates to Chicago

Turabian is Chicago style for students. That is the short version. Kate Turabian wrote A Manual for Writers of Research Papers, Theses, and Dissertations as a student-accessible guide to Chicago’s The Chicago Manual of Style — a large reference work originally aimed at editors and publishers. The citation rules in both are the same. Turabian adds guidance Chicago does not cover: how to format a student title page, how to handle thesis submission requirements, and how to approach common student writing scenarios.

The current edition is the 9th, published in 2018 by the University of Chicago Press. It covers both Turabian citation systems — notes-bibliography and author-date — along with updated guidance on digital sources and DOIs.

The Primary Source

Turabian, Kate L. A Manual for Writers of Research Papers, Theses, and Dissertations. 9th edn. Revised by Wayne C. Booth et al. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2018. This is the authoritative reference. When in doubt, go here.

Two Systems, One Style

Notes-bibliography for humanities (history, literature, arts, philosophy). Author-date for sciences and social sciences (sociology, political science, education, economics). Your subject determines the system — not your preference.

Student-Specific Guidance

Turabian covers things Chicago does not: thesis and dissertation formatting, title page layout, paper submission requirements. If your guidelines say “Chicago style,” Turabian is generally acceptable. If they say “Turabian,” use the manual directly.

2

Two Systems — Pick the Right One Before You Start

Notes-bibliography uses footnotes or endnotes plus a bibliography. Author-date uses parenthetical in-text citations plus a reference list. Both are Turabian. They are not interchangeable. Using the wrong system for your subject is a structural formatting error that affects every citation in your paper — not a minor slip you can fix in proofreading.

The Two Systems: Which One Applies to You

This is the most important decision in Turabian. Get it right before you write a single citation.

System Subjects In-Text Signal End of Paper
Notes-Bibliography (N-B) History, literature, arts, philosophy, religious studies, classics, film studies Superscript number: like this¹ Bibliography (alphabetical)
Author-Date (A-D) Sociology, political science, education, economics, linguistics, natural sciences Parenthetical: (Smith 2021, 45) Reference list (alphabetical)
If Your Guidelines Do Not Specify — Ask

Some departments mix disciplines. Some interdisciplinary courses do not specify clearly. Do not guess. Email your instructor or check the module handbook. Using notes-bibliography in a sociology paper because you prefer footnotes is not acceptable — and using author-date in a history paper because it is easier is equally wrong. The system is part of the discipline’s citation culture, not a formatting preference.

Notes-Bibliography: How Footnotes Work

In notes-bibliography, every citation appears as a superscript number in your text. The citation detail sits at the bottom of the page as a footnote — or at the end of the document as an endnote. Most instructors prefer footnotes unless they specify endnotes. The footnote gives the reader the source information right there on the page without interrupting the prose.

There are two types of notes: full notes and short notes. The first time you cite a source, give a full note. After that, use a shortened form.

1

Full Note — First Citation of a Source

Author First Last, Title of Book (Place: Publisher, Year), page number.
Example: 1. Mary Beard, SPQR: A History of Ancient Rome (London: Profile Books, 2015), 112.

2

Short Note — All Subsequent Citations

Author Last Name, shortened title, page number.
Example: 4. Beard, SPQR, 234. The shortened title should be recognisable — usually the first few significant words of the full title.

3

Ibid. — Only for the Immediately Preceding Note

If your note refers to the exact same source as the note immediately before it, write Ibid. If the page is different: Ibid., 45. If any other note appears between them, use the short form instead.

4

Substantive Footnotes — Not Just Citations

Notes-bibliography allows footnotes to contain explanatory commentary, additional context, or discursive notes alongside citations. A footnote can include both a citation and a clarifying remark. This is one reason historians prefer the system — the footnote space supports scholarly nuance without interrupting the main argument.

Footnote Examples — Notes-Bibliography System // Full note — book, first citation 1. Mary Beard, SPQR: A History of Ancient Rome (London: Profile Books, 2015), 112. // Full note — journal article, first citation 2. James C. Scott, “Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance,” Journal of Peasant Studies 13, no. 2 (1986): 5–35. // Full note — chapter in an edited book 3. Angela Davis, “Rape, Racism and the Capitalist Setting,” in The Angela Y. Davis Reader, ed. Joy James (Oxford: Blackwell, 1998), 129–45. // Short note — subsequent citation of Beard 5. Beard, SPQR, 234. // Ibid. — same source and same page as immediately preceding note 6. Ibid. // Ibid. — same source, different page 7. Ibid., 301. // WRONG — author name reversed in footnote 1. Beard, Mary. SPQR: A History of Ancient Rome (London: Profile Books, 2015), 112. // In footnotes, name order is First Last. Reversed order (Last, First) is for the bibliography only.

The Bibliography — Format Rules

The bibliography is not just the footnote notes copied to a list. The format is different. Author names are reversed. Punctuation between elements changes from commas to periods. Page ranges for articles replace the specific page number. These are required differences, not optional variations.

Bibliography Rules

  • Starts on a new page, headed “Bibliography” — centred
  • Alphabetical by first author’s last name
  • Hanging indent — first line flush, subsequent lines indented
  • Author name order: Last, First (reversed from footnotes)
  • Periods between main elements, not commas
  • No note numbers — no “1.” or “2.”
  • Articles: full page range (pp. 5–35), not a specific page
  • Every cited source appears here once

Footnote vs. Bibliography — Side by Side

Footnote (first citation):

1. Mary Beard, SPQR: A History of Ancient Rome (London: Profile Books, 2015), 112.

Bibliography entry:

Beard, Mary. SPQR: A History of Ancient Rome. London: Profile Books, 2015.

Note the differences: name reversed, commas replaced by periods, specific page removed, parentheses around publication info replaced by periods.

1Name Order — Reversed in Bibliography, Not in Footnotes

In footnotes: First Last. In the bibliography: Last, First. For two or more authors in the bibliography: only the first author’s name is reversed. “Smith, John, and Mary Jones.” Not “Smith, John, and Jones, Mary.” The reversal applies only to the lead author — because that is the name used for alphabetisation.

2Punctuation Pattern — Periods Between Elements

Bibliography: Beard, Mary. SPQR. London: Profile Books, 2015. Notice the periods after the author name and after the title. Footnote: Mary Beard, SPQR (London: Profile Books, 2015), 112. Notice commas and parentheses instead. The punctuation difference is not trivial — it is how readers know which format they are reading.

3Articles — Full Page Range in Bibliography, Specific Page in Footnotes

Footnote: “…Journal Name 13, no. 2 (1986): 5.” Bibliography: “…Journal Name 13, no. 2 (1986): 5–35.” The bibliography gives the full span of the article so a reader can locate it. The footnote specifies the exact page you are citing from.

Author-Date System: In-Text Citations and Reference List

In author-date, citations live in the text itself — in parentheses, not footnotes. The format is (Last Year, page). No superscript numbers. No footnotes. The reference list at the end looks similar to a bibliography but uses a slightly different internal format.

Situation In-Text Format Note
One author, paraphrase (Smith 2021) No comma between name and year. This differs from Harvard.
One author, direct quote (Smith 2021, 45) Page number after a comma. No “p.” prefix.
Two authors (Smith and Jones 2021) Use “and” — not “&”.
Three or more authors (Smith et al. 2021) Et al. from the first citation in-text.
Narrative citation Smith (2021) argues that… Year in parentheses immediately after the name.
Two works, same parenthetical (Jones 2019; Smith 2021) Separated by semicolon. Chronological order.
Same author, same year (Smith 2021a; Smith 2021b) Lowercase letter suffix. Match in reference list.
Organisation as author (WHO 2022) Abbreviation acceptable after first full use.
No author (Shortened Title 2021) Italicise for stand-alone works.
No date (Smith n.d.) Turabian author-date uses “n.d.” — not “no date.”
Turabian Author-Date Uses “n.d.” — Notes-Bibliography Uses “n.d.” Too

Unlike Harvard, which uses “no date” (in Cite Them Right), Turabian uses “n.d.” in both systems for sources with no identifiable date. This is consistent with Chicago style. If you have been trained in Harvard referencing, note this difference — the abbreviation convention is different. In Turabian: (Smith n.d.) in author-date, and “n.d.” in the bibliography year slot for notes-bibliography.

Books — Single Author, Edited, Chapters, E-books

Books are the most common source type in humanities and social science papers. The format differs between systems and between footnotes and bibliography entries.

Book Examples — Notes-Bibliography System // Footnote — single author book 1. David Olusoga, Black and British: A Forgotten History (London: Macmillan, 2016), 78. // Bibliography — same book Olusoga, David. Black and British: A Forgotten History. London: Macmillan, 2016. // Footnote — edited book 2. Jennifer Terry and Jacqueline Urla, eds., Deviant Bodies (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1995), 14. // Bibliography — edited book Terry, Jennifer, and Jacqueline Urla, eds. Deviant Bodies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1995. // Footnote — chapter in an edited book 3. Stuart Hall, “Cultural Identity and Diaspora,” in Identity: Community, Culture, Difference, ed. Jonathan Rutherford (London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1990), 222–37. // Bibliography — same chapter Hall, Stuart. “Cultural Identity and Diaspora.” In Identity: Community, Culture, Difference, edited by Jonathan Rutherford, 222–37. London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1990. // E-book with DOI — bibliography Piketty, Thomas. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674369542.
Book Examples — Author-Date System // In-text citation (Olusoga 2016, 78) // Reference list entry — single author Olusoga, David. 2016. Black and British: A Forgotten History. London: Macmillan. // Reference list entry — chapter in edited book Hall, Stuart. 1990. “Cultural Identity and Diaspora.” In Identity: Community, Culture, Difference, edited by Jonathan Rutherford, 222–37. London: Lawrence and Wishart. // Key difference from N-B: year moves to immediately after author name // In author-date, the year is the second element: Last, First. Year. Title…
The Year Position Is Different Between Systems

In notes-bibliography bibliography entries: Last, First. Title. Place: Publisher, Year. The year comes at the end of the publication information. In author-date reference list entries: Last, First. Year. Title. Place: Publisher. The year moves to the second position. This is not a small stylistic difference — it is a structural feature of how each system works, because author-date readers scan for the year immediately after the author name.

Journal Articles

Journal articles in Turabian follow the same logic as books — different formats for footnotes versus bibliography, and slightly different element order for author-date. The volume-issue-year-page pattern is consistent across both systems.

Volume, Issue, and Year — How to Format Them

Format: volume number, no. issue number (year): page(s). So: 13, no. 2 (1986): 5–35. The “no.” before the issue number is Turabian style. Do not write “vol.” before the volume number — just the numeral. Do not put a comma between volume and “no.”

DOIs — Always Use When Available

When a DOI is available, include it at the end of the reference: https://doi.org/10.xxxx/xxxxx. Turabian 9th edition recommends presenting DOIs as full URLs, not the older “doi:10.xxxx” format. If no DOI is available, include the database URL or the journal’s homepage URL.

Journal Article Examples — Both Systems // N-B footnote — online article with DOI 4. Amartya Sen, “Development as Capability Expansion,” Journal of Development Planning 19 (1989): 41–58. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/xxxxxx. // N-B bibliography — same article Sen, Amartya. “Development as Capability Expansion.” Journal of Development Planning 19 (1989): 41–58. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/xxxxxx. // Author-date in-text (Sen 1989, 44) // Author-date reference list Sen, Amartya. 1989. “Development as Capability Expansion.” Journal of Development Planning 19: 41–58. https://doi.org/10.xxxx/xxxxxx. // WRONG — article title in italics Sen, Amartya. Development as Capability Expansion. Journal of Development Planning 19 (1989): 41–58. // Article titles go in quotation marks. Journal names are italicised. Not the other way around.

Websites and Online Sources

Websites create the same problems in Turabian as in every other style: missing authors, missing dates, URLs that break. The approach is the same — capture everything available, and document the access date when content may change.

Element 1

Author or Organisation

Named person: Last, First. If no individual, use the organisation name. If neither is identifiable, the page title stands in as the author.

Element 2

Title of Page

“In quotation marks,” treated like an article title. The website name — if different from the page title — follows in plain text after a period.

Element 3

Publication Date

Month Day, Year format: January 15, 2024. If only a year is available, use the year. If none is available, use “n.d.” and include an access date.

Element 4

URL

Full URL. Not shortened. Not a hyperlink anchor — write the actual address. If a DOI is available, use that instead.

Element 5

Access Date

Required when content may change or disappear. Format: “Accessed Month Day, Year.” Turabian recommends including it for all web sources without a stable identifier like a DOI.

N-B vs A-D

Year Position Differs

N-B bibliography: the date appears near the URL. Author-date reference list: the year appears immediately after the author name — same as for books and articles.

Website Examples — Both Systems // N-B footnote — organisation as author 5. World Health Organization, “Mental Health: Strengthening Our Response,” May 2022, https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-health-strengthening-our-response (accessed February 10, 2025). // N-B bibliography — same source World Health Organization. “Mental Health: Strengthening Our Response.” May 2022. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-health-strengthening-our-response. Accessed February 10, 2025. // Author-date in-text — organisation (World Health Organization 2022) // Author-date reference list World Health Organization. 2022. “Mental Health: Strengthening Our Response.” May 2022. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/mental-health-strengthening-our-response. Accessed February 10, 2025. // No author — title as author substitute “Guide to Research Ethics.” Research Ethics Online. Accessed March 5, 2025. https://www.researchethics.org/guide.

Primary Sources and Archives

This is where Turabian earns its reputation in humanities subjects. History papers, in particular, rely heavily on primary sources — unpublished manuscripts, archival collections, letters, diaries, government records, contemporary newspapers. Turabian’s notes-bibliography system handles these in detail.

Archival Document

Footnote Format — Unpublished Archival Source

Author (if known), “Document Title,” Date, Box/Folder information, Collection Name, Repository Name, Location.
Example: 6. Winston Churchill, “Memorandum on War Strategy,” August 1940, Box 3, Folder 12, Churchill Papers, Churchill College Archive, Cambridge.

Historical Newspaper

Newspaper Article — N-B Footnote

Author (if given), “Article Title,” Newspaper Name, Month Day, Year, page(s).
Example: 7. “Parliament Debates Reform Bill,” The Times, March 14, 1832, 3.

Published Primary Source

Letter or Document in an Edited Collection

Treat as a chapter in an edited book: Author of Letter/Document, “Title or Description,” in Collection Title, ed. Editor Name (Place: Publisher, Year), page range.

Government Document

Official Government Report or Publication

Country/Institution Name. Title of Document. Place: Publisher, Year. For UK Parliament documents: Hansard, volume (date), column number.

Archival Sources — Consistency Over Perfection

Turabian acknowledges that archival sources vary enormously and no single template fits all of them. The goal is to give enough information that a reader could locate the specific document. Include: who created it, what it is called or described as, when it was created, where it is held, and any collection or finding aid information that would help locate it. If you are uncertain about a specific archive’s citation conventions, check the archive’s own guide — many major archives publish their preferred citation format.

Ibid., Short Forms, and Subsequent Notes

Once you have given the full citation in a first note, every subsequent note for the same source uses a shortened form. This is one of the features of notes-bibliography that trips students up most often.

Wrong — Repeating the Full Note

1. Mary Beard, SPQR: A History of Ancient Rome (London: Profile Books, 2015), 112.

…text continues…

4. Mary Beard, SPQR: A History of Ancient Rome (London: Profile Books, 2015), 201.

Repeating the full note after the first citation is unnecessary and clutters the footnotes. Use the short form.

Correct — Short Form After First Full Note

1. Mary Beard, SPQR: A History of Ancient Rome (London: Profile Books, 2015), 112.

…text continues…

4. Beard, SPQR, 201.

Short form: Last name, shortened title (in italics for a book), page number. Clear, concise, locatable.

Ibid. Only Works for the Immediately Preceding Note

This is the single most common Ibid. error. Note 7 cites Beard. Note 8 cites a different source. Note 9 wants to cite Beard again. You cannot use Ibid. in note 9 — the preceding note (note 8) is a different source. Use Beard, SPQR, 201 instead. Ibid. means “the same place as the note directly above.” Any intervening note breaks the chain.

Special Cases: No Author, No Date, No Page

?

No Author

Use the title in place of the author. In footnotes and in-text: start with the title (shortened if long). In the bibliography or reference list: alphabetise by the first significant word of the title, ignoring “A,” “An,” “The.” Do not write “Anonymous” unless that is how the source was actually published.

?

No Date

Use “n.d.” in both systems. Footnote year slot: (n.d.). Bibliography year slot: n.d. Author-date in-text: (Smith n.d.). Reference list year slot: n.d. Before concluding no date exists, check page footers, URL structure, any “last updated” text, and the source’s own metadata.

?

No Page Number — Online Sources

For direct quotes from sources without page numbers: use paragraph number (para. 3), section heading (“under ‘Introduction'”), or for video/audio sources, a timestamp (00:04:22). In author-date: (Smith 2021, para. 3). In footnotes: Smith, “Title,” para. 3.

?

No Publisher or Place

If place of publication is unknown: use “n.p.” (for no place). If publisher is unknown: also “n.p.” (context makes clear which is missing) or write it out: “no publisher.” For self-published works, the author acts as publisher. For genuinely obscure older sources, check the library’s catalogue record for publisher details.

Dissertation and Thesis Formatting

This is where Turabian has a clear advantage over the Chicago Manual — it was written with students submitting papers and theses in mind. Chapter 6 of the 9th edition is dedicated entirely to paper formatting. Follow it alongside your institution’s submission guidelines, which take precedence on any institutional specifics.

Title Page Elements — Standard Turabian Model

  • Title centred, approximately one-third down the page
  • Your full name — centred, below the title
  • Course name and number, instructor name, institution
  • Submission date — last line, centred
  • All elements double-spaced
  • No page number on the title page

General Formatting — Turabian 9th Edition

  • 12-point readable font (Times New Roman or similar)
  • 1-inch margins on all sides
  • Double-spaced main text
  • First line of each paragraph indented 0.5 inches
  • Footnotes single-spaced, with a blank line between notes
  • Page numbers: top right, starting from first page of text (not title page)
Your Institution’s Guidelines Override Turabian on Formatting

Turabian provides a default model. Your university’s thesis submission guidelines — particularly for dissertations — specify margins, font requirements, binding, and page numbering conventions that may differ. Read your institution’s guidelines first. Use Turabian for citation rules; use your institution’s guide for document formatting. When they conflict, your institution wins.

Common Errors That Cost Marks

Using the Wrong System for Your Subject

Notes-bibliography in a sociology paper. Author-date in a history essay. The citation content may be technically correct, but using the wrong system signals that you did not read your assignment guidelines — and it structures every citation incorrectly for your discipline’s conventions.

Confirm Which System Before Starting

Check your assignment guidelines. If not specified, look at what your department publishes in reading lists and example papers, or ask your instructor. Humanities: notes-bibliography. Social and natural sciences: author-date. One question saves hours of reformatting.

Reversing Author Name in Footnotes

“1. Smith, John, Title…” — the reversed name format (Last, First) is for the bibliography only. Footnotes use normal name order: First Last. This distinction matters and it is checked.

First Last in Footnotes, Last First in Bibliography

Footnote: John Smith. Bibliography: Smith, John. The reversal in the bibliography is for alphabetisation — the reader scans by surname. The footnote is a sequential note, not an alphabetical list, so normal name order applies.

Misusing Ibid.

Using Ibid. when any note appears between the current note and the source being re-cited. Or using it to refer to a source cited three notes ago. Ibid. means immediately preceding — nothing else.

Short Form for Anything That Isn’t Immediately Preceding

When in doubt, use the short form: Last, Shortened Title, page. It is always correct. Ibid. is a convenience that only applies in one specific situation. If you are uncertain whether Ibid. applies, use the short form instead — it is never wrong.

Putting the Year at the End in Author-Date Reference List

“Smith, John. Title. Place: Publisher, 2021.” — this is notes-bibliography format. In author-date, the year moves to immediately after the author name: “Smith, John. 2021. Title. Place: Publisher.” Mixing the two formats is one of the most common student errors when switching between systems.

Year Second in Author-Date, Year Last in N-B Bibliography

Author-date: Last, First. Year. Title. Place: Publisher. N-B bibliography: Last, First. Title. Place: Publisher, Year. The year position is the clearest single structural difference between the two reference list formats.

No Comma Between Author and Year in Author-Date

Wait — that is actually correct for Turabian. In Turabian author-date, in-text format is (Smith 2021) with no comma. Students from Harvard-trained backgrounds write (Smith, 2021) habitually. In Turabian, the comma is absent. This is a small but consistent difference.

(Smith 2021) — No Comma in Turabian Author-Date In-Text

Harvard: (Smith, 2021). Turabian author-date: (Smith 2021). The comma separating author and year is a Harvard convention, not a Turabian one. If you write Turabian author-date citations, remove the comma. Check every in-text citation before submitting.

Repeating Full Notes After the First Citation

Writing the complete citation in footnotes 1, 4, 8, and 12 for the same source. Once you have given the full note, every subsequent note for that source uses the short form. Repeated full notes suggest unfamiliarity with the system.

Full Note Once, Short Form From Then On

Full note on first citation: all elements. Short form every time after: Last, Shortened Title, page. Keep a running list of your first-note sources as you write so you always know whether a source has been introduced yet.

Frequently Asked Questions About Turabian Citation

What is the difference between Turabian and Chicago style?
Turabian is a student-facing adaptation of Chicago style. Both use the same two citation systems — notes-bibliography and author-date — and the formatting rules are the same. Turabian adds content Chicago does not cover: how to format a title page, how to handle thesis and dissertation submissions, and guidance on common student writing situations. The practical difference is scope, not format. If your guidelines say “Chicago style,” Turabian is generally acceptable. If they say “Turabian,” follow A Manual for Writers specifically — particularly for dissertation formatting chapters.
Which Turabian system should I use — notes-bibliography or author-date?
Your subject determines this, not your preference. Notes-bibliography is used in humanities disciplines: history, literature, arts, philosophy, religious studies, film studies. Author-date is used in social sciences, natural sciences, and some professional fields: sociology, political science, education, economics, linguistics. If your assignment guidelines do not specify, look at what your department normally publishes, check course reading lists for format clues, or ask your instructor directly. Using the wrong system is a structural formatting error — it is not equivalent to a minor punctuation slip.
How do Turabian footnotes work?
In notes-bibliography, every citation is flagged in the text with a superscript number. The corresponding note at the bottom of the page (footnote) or end of the document (endnote) gives the citation detail. The first note for a source provides full details: author name (First Last), title, publication information, and page number. All subsequent notes for that source use a shortened form: Last Name, Shortened Title, page. If the note refers to exactly the same source as the immediately preceding note, you can write Ibid. (same page) or Ibid., page number (different page). The bibliography at the end of the paper lists all cited sources alphabetically with a slightly different format — reversed author name and different punctuation.
What is the difference between a footnote and a bibliography entry in Turabian?
Same source, different format. Footnote: First Last, Title (Place: Publisher, Year), page number. Bibliography: Last, First. Title. Place: Publisher, Year. The three structural differences: (1) name order is reversed in the bibliography — Last, First becomes the format for alphabetisation; (2) commas and parentheses in footnotes are replaced by periods in the bibliography; (3) footnotes cite a specific page, the bibliography gives the full page range for articles and chapters. These are required format differences, not stylistic options.
When can I use “Ibid.” in Turabian footnotes?
Only when the source is identical to the immediately preceding note — the note directly above, with no other note in between. If note 7 is Smith, note 8 can be Ibid. (or Ibid., 45 for a different page). If note 8 is a different source and note 9 wants to cite Smith again, you cannot use Ibid. in note 9. Use the short form instead: Smith, Shortened Title, page. When in doubt, use the short form — it is always correct. Ibid. is a convenience, not a requirement.
How do I cite a primary source in Turabian?
Turabian’s notes-bibliography system handles primary sources in detail. For archival documents: Author (if known), “Document Title,” date, box/folder/collection information, repository name and location. For published primary sources (documents in edited collections): cite as a chapter in an edited book — author of the document, “Document title,” in Collection Title, ed. Editor Name (Place: Publisher, Year), pages. For historical newspapers: Author (if given), “Article Title,” Newspaper Name, Month Day, Year, page. The principle throughout is: identify the document precisely enough that a reader could locate it.
Does Turabian require a title page?
Turabian provides a model title page format for research papers. The standard elements: paper title centred about one-third down the page, your name, course name and number, instructor name, institution, and submission date — each on its own line, centred and double-spaced. For theses and dissertations, your institution’s specific submission requirements take priority over the Turabian model — most universities have their own mandated title page format. If your assignment guidelines say nothing about a title page, a simple header on the first page (name, course, date) is usually acceptable — Turabian covers both scenarios in Chapter 6 of the 9th edition.
How do I cite a website in Turabian?
In notes-bibliography — Footnote: Author First Last, “Page Title,” Site Name, Month Day, Year, URL (accessed Month Day, Year). Bibliography: Author Last, First. “Page Title.” Site Name. Month Day, Year. URL. Accessed Month Day, Year. In author-date — In-text: (Author Last Year). Reference list: Author Last, First. Year. “Page Title.” Site Name. Month Day, Year. URL. Accessed Month Day, Year. For websites with no named author, use the organisation name or begin with the page title. Always include an access date for web sources without a stable DOI.
What is the current edition of Turabian?
The 9th edition, published in 2018: Turabian, Kate L. A Manual for Writers of Research Papers, Theses, and Dissertations. 9th edition, revised by Wayne C. Booth, Gregory G. Colomb, Joseph M. Williams, Joseph Bizup, William T. FitzGerald, and the University of Chicago Press Editorial Staff. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2018. The 9th edition updated guidelines for digital sources, DOIs, and online databases. Most university libraries stock it in print and through library databases. If you are working from an earlier edition, the core citation rules are largely the same, but digital source guidance may differ.
Can I use Turabian for a history dissertation?
Yes — history is one of the subjects for which Turabian’s notes-bibliography system was designed. It handles primary source citation (archival documents, newspapers, government records, manuscripts, oral history interviews) in more detail than most other student-facing guides. The notes-bibliography system also allows substantive footnotes — where you add explanatory commentary or discursive context alongside citations — which historians use regularly. The 9th edition’s dissertation formatting chapters (Chapters 6 and 7) are directly applicable to history thesis submissions. Check whether your department specifies Turabian or Chicago; in practical terms the citation rules are the same, but Turabian’s formatting guidance is more student-oriented.

Turabian Citations Taking Too Long?

From footnote formatting and bibliography structure to full academic writing support across Turabian, Chicago, Harvard, APA, and OSCOLA — our specialist team helps students get citations right the first time.

Academic Writing Services Get Started

What Getting Turabian Right Actually Takes

The students who lose marks on Turabian are usually not the ones who ignored the rules. They are the ones who found one template online, copied it, and assumed one template covers both systems and all source types. It does not. A book footnote looks different from a journal footnote. A bibliography entry looks different from the same source’s footnote. The author-date reference list uses a different year position from the notes-bibliography bibliography.

Three things prevent almost every Turabian error. First: confirm which system — notes-bibliography or author-date — before writing citation one. Second: learn the format differences between footnotes and bibliography entries if you are in notes-bibliography. They share the same information but in different order with different punctuation. Third: check your in-text citations against your bibliography or reference list before submitting. Every citation must have a matching entry. Every entry must be cited.

Citation generators can help with structure. They do not know which Turabian system your department uses, they frequently get footnote-vs-bibliography format differences wrong, and they miss things like missing access dates or malformed DOI formatting. Use them as a starting point. Verify the output against the 9th edition or your institution’s Turabian guide.

For structured support with Turabian citations, Chicago formatting, bibliography and reference list auditing, and broader academic writing help — from undergraduate research papers to postgraduate dissertations — our academic writing services, citation and referencing support, and proofreading and editing services cover every referencing style and every level of study.

Citation and Referencing Support

Turabian, Chicago, Harvard, APA, OSCOLA, Vancouver — specialist referencing help and academic writing support at every level of study.

Explore Citation Support
Article Reviewed by

Simon

Experienced content lead, SEO specialist, and educator with a strong background in social sciences and economics.

Bio Profile

To top