Common Thesis Statement Mistakes to Avoid: Expert Guide to Strengthening Academic Arguments
3.8/5 Trustpilot
Recognizing common thesis statement mistakes enables you to avoid errors that undermine essay quality before they compromise your academic performance. Research by Cambridge Proofreading demonstrates that thesis construction errors—including stating facts instead of arguments, using vague language, announcing intentions, and mismatching scope to essay length—account for significant portions of low essay grades across academic disciplines. Understanding these frequent pitfalls transforms abstract thesis statement principles into concrete revision strategies you can apply immediately. This comprehensive guide systematically examines thesis statement mistakes students commonly make, explains why each error weakens essays, provides corrected examples demonstrating proper construction, and offers diagnostic questions for identifying weaknesses in your own writing. Whether you struggle with arguability, specificity, scope, or formatting, mastering error recognition strengthens your ability to craft effective central claims that anchor successful academic writing across all disciplines and assignment types.
Table of Contents
- Understanding Thesis Statement Errors
- Stating Facts Instead of Arguments
- Using Vague, Abstract Language
- Announcing Instead of Arguing
- Posing Questions Rather Than Answers
- Listing Topics Without Unifying Claims
- Scope Problems: Too Broad or Narrow
- Using Weak or Passive Verbs
- Inappropriate First-Person Usage
- Trying to Argue Too Much
- Failing to Show Significance
- Formatting and Placement Errors
- Meet Our Thesis Correction Experts
- Student Success Stories
- Frequently Asked Questions
Understanding Thesis Statement Errors
Thesis statement mistakes fall into identifiable categories, each undermining essay effectiveness in specific ways. Recognizing error patterns enables systematic correction.
Common Thesis Errors
| Error Type | Core Problem | Impact on Essay |
|---|---|---|
| Factual Statement | Presents verifiable facts requiring no argument | Eliminates essay purpose; nothing to defend |
| Vague Language | Uses abstract terms without concrete specifics | Provides no clear direction; reader confusion |
| Announcement | States intentions rather than arguing positions | Weakens authority; focuses on process not claim |
| Question Format | Poses questions instead of asserting answers | Signals uncertainty; fails to guide essay |
| Topic List | Lists subjects without unifying argument | Creates disconnected sections; no coherence |
| Scope Mismatch | Claims too broad or narrow for essay length | Superficial analysis or insufficient content |
Why Thesis Errors Matter
Weak thesis statements cascade through essays, undermining every subsequent element. According to Altynay Karatayeva (2025), thesis construction errors affect paragraph organization, evidence selection, and argumentative coherence, reducing overall essay quality regardless of writing skill or research depth. Students developing strong thesis statements gain competitive advantages in academic contexts by avoiding common pitfalls that compromise otherwise solid work.
Thesis statement mistakes don’t remain isolated to single sentences—they compromise entire essays. Vague thesis statements produce unfocused body paragraphs. Overly broad claims force superficial treatment of complex topics. Factual statements leave nothing to defend, creating essays that merely describe rather than analyze. Recognizing thesis errors early in your writing process prevents wasted effort developing arguments built on weak foundations. Always evaluate and strengthen thesis statements before drafting body paragraphs.
Stating Facts Instead of Arguments
The most prevalent thesis error involves presenting verifiable facts as thesis statements. Facts require no defense because everyone accepts them as true, eliminating essay argumentative purpose.
Identifying Factual Statements
Factual thesis statements describe reality without interpretation, evaluation, or controversial positions. These statements might be interesting information, but they cannot function as thesis statements because no reasonable person would dispute them. Test your thesis by asking: “Could someone disagree with this using evidence?” If not, you’ve stated a fact rather than made an argument.
Error:
William Shakespeare wrote Hamlet in the early 1600s.
Why It Fails:
Verifiable historical fact requiring no argument or defense.
Correction:
Hamlet’s tragic flaw stems from intellectual overthinking rather than moral weakness, making him a distinctly modern protagonist who anticipates existential philosophy.
Error:
The United States fought in World War II from 1941 to 1945.
Why It Fails:
Historical fact documented in every textbook; no controversy exists.
Correction:
American entry into World War II transformed the nation’s global role from isolationist reluctance to international leadership, establishing patterns of military intervention that continue shaping foreign policy today.
Error:
Social media platforms connect people online.
Why It Fails:
Obvious function requiring no explanation or defense.
Correction:
Social media’s algorithmic amplification of emotionally charged content polarizes political discourse by rewarding extremism over nuance, threatening democratic deliberation more than misinformation itself.
Transforming Facts into Arguments
Convert factual observations into arguable claims by adding interpretation, evaluation, or analysis. Ask yourself: “So what? Why does this fact matter? What does it mean?” Your answers transform description into argument.
| Fact | Question to Ask | Arguable Thesis |
|---|---|---|
| College costs have increased. | What are the consequences? | Rising college costs exclude qualified low-income students from higher education, perpetuating intergenerational poverty and reducing social mobility. |
| Climate change involves rising temperatures. | What should we do about it? | Addressing climate change requires economic restructuring prioritizing environmental stability over short-term growth despite political resistance. |
| Shakespeare uses metaphors. | What do they reveal? | Hamlet’s disease metaphors reveal Shakespeare’s understanding that political corruption spreads like physical contagion through social bodies. |
Using Vague, Abstract Language
Vague thesis statements employ abstract terminology without concrete specifics, leaving readers uncertain about your actual position or argument direction.
Common Vagueness Signals
Certain words signal vague thinking requiring replacement with concrete specifics. Students seeking support with essay writing services frequently need assistance eliminating these problematic terms:
- Aspects: Replace with specific characteristics you’ll examine
- Factors: Name the actual elements influencing outcomes
- Things: Specify what you mean rather than using generic terms
- Ways: Describe actual methods or approaches
- Society/People: Identify specific populations or groups
- Important/Interesting: Explain why or how something matters
Vague Error:
Various factors contribute to student success in college.
Specific Correction:
First-generation college students’ success correlates more strongly with peer mentorship programs than traditional academic advising, suggesting institutional support structures should prioritize student-led initiatives.
Vague Error:
Technology affects how people communicate in important ways.
Specific Correction:
Smartphone ubiquity has eliminated workplace boundaries between professional and personal time, increasing employee stress while decreasing productivity despite constant connectivity.
Vague Error:
There are many aspects to consider regarding climate change.
Specific Correction:
Climate change mitigation requires simultaneous action on industrial emissions, agricultural methane production, and deforestation, as addressing transportation alone proves insufficient for meeting Paris Agreement targets.
Testing for Specificity
Apply these diagnostic questions to identify vague language requiring replacement:
Can You Name Specific Examples?
If “factors” or “aspects” appear, list them explicitly. Vague terms hide unclear thinking; concrete specifics demonstrate mastery.
Would Readers Know Your Argument Without Body Paragraphs?
Specific thesis statements communicate positions clearly without additional context. Vague claims require body paragraphs to clarify meaning.
Could This Apply to Multiple Topics?
Generic statements that work for numerous subjects signal vagueness. Effective thesis statements apply specifically to your particular topic and argument.
Announcing Instead of Arguing
Announcement thesis statements describe what essays will discuss rather than asserting positions requiring defense. This error shifts focus from arguments to process.
Recognizing Announcement Phrases
Certain phrases signal announcements requiring removal and replacement with actual arguments:
Announcement Error:
This essay will discuss the causes of the Civil War.
Argument Correction:
Economic conflicts over slavery’s expansion into western territories caused the Civil War more directly than abstract debates about states’ rights, as territorial disputes made abstract principles concrete and irreconcilable.
Announcement Error:
In this paper, I will examine the effects of social media on teenagers.
Argument Correction:
Instagram’s visual-centric platform intensifies appearance-based anxiety among teenage users, as demonstrated by correlations between platform usage rates and increased body dysmorphia diagnoses.
Announcement Error:
The purpose of this essay is to explain renewable energy benefits.
Argument Correction:
Transitioning to renewable energy requires substantial infrastructure investment, yet long-term economic and environmental costs of continued fossil fuel dependence far exceed short-term conversion expenses.
Why Announcements Weaken Writing
Announcements reduce authorial confidence by emphasizing process rather than substance. According to research on academic writing effectiveness, announcement phrases signal uncertainty about arguments while drawing attention to essay mechanics rather than intellectual content. Removing announcement language strengthens thesis statements by forcing direct articulation of positions without hedging qualifiers.
Posing Questions Rather Than Answers
Thesis statements must answer questions, not ask them. Questions signal uncertainty rather than asserting definitive positions that guide essays.
Question Format Errors
While research questions appropriately guide inquiry, thesis statements declare conclusions. Transform interrogative sentences into declarative claims presenting answers your essay defends.
Question Error:
How does social media affect democracy?
Statement Correction:
Social media platforms’ algorithmic amplification of emotionally charged content polarizes political discourse by rewarding extremism over nuance, threatening democratic deliberation more than misinformation itself.
Question Error:
Should colleges eliminate standardized testing requirements?
Statement Correction:
Colleges should eliminate standardized testing requirements because these assessments disproportionately disadvantage low-income students while failing to predict academic success more accurately than high school GPA.
Question Error:
What caused World War I?
Statement Correction:
World War I resulted less from Archduke Ferdinand’s assassination than from entangling alliances and imperial competition that made localized conflict inevitable, transforming Balkan tensions into global war.
Using Questions Appropriately
Questions serve valuable functions in introductions, establishing context and motivating interest. However, thesis statements themselves must be declarative, answering the questions introductions pose. Position questions before thesis statements, using them to transition into your central claim.
Listing Topics Without Unifying Claims
List thesis statements enumerate subjects for discussion without advancing unified arguments connecting topics. These statements create disconnected essays lacking coherent organization.
Recognizing Topic Lists
Topic list thesis statements typically include “and” connecting multiple subjects without explaining relationships or advancing interpretive positions about connections.
List Error:
This essay examines symbolism, characterization, and theme in The Great Gatsby.
Unified Correction:
Fitzgerald’s symbolism in The Great Gatsby—particularly the green light, valley of ashes, and Doctor Eckleburg’s eyes—exposes the American Dream’s corruption by materialism that destroys genuine human connection.
List Error:
Climate change affects agriculture, wildlife, and human health.
Unified Correction:
Climate change threatens global food security more through agricultural disruption than direct health impacts, as crop failures and livestock losses cascade into malnutrition affecting billions.
List Error:
The Civil Rights Movement involved protests, legislation, and cultural change.
Unified Correction:
The Civil Rights Movement’s legislative victories depended on grassroots protests that shifted public opinion, demonstrating that legal change follows rather than precedes cultural transformation.
Creating Unifying Arguments
Transform topic lists into unified thesis statements by identifying the relationship connecting subjects. Ask: “How do these topics relate? What pattern connects them? What larger point do they collectively support?”
Scope Problems: Too Broad or Narrow
Scope mismatches occur when thesis statements promise more comprehensive coverage than essay lengths permit or address topics too narrow for extended analysis.
Overly Broad Thesis Statements
Broad thesis statements attempt to address massive topics requiring book-length treatment within essays spanning few pages. These claims force superficial analysis lacking necessary depth. Students developing research papers must carefully calibrate thesis scope to available space and evidence.
Too Broad:
War has shaped human civilization throughout history.
Appropriately Scoped:
World War I’s trench warfare fundamentally altered military strategy by demonstrating offensive warfare’s futility against modern defensive weapons, ending cavalry charges and establishing artillery dominance.
Too Broad:
Literature reflects society’s values and concerns.
Appropriately Scoped:
Victorian novels’ obsession with inheritance plots reflects middle-class anxiety about maintaining social position in rapidly industrializing Britain where traditional wealth markers faced unprecedented disruption.
Excessively Narrow Thesis Statements
Conversely, overly narrow thesis statements leave insufficient material for extended analysis, forcing writers to pad essays with irrelevant information.
| Too Narrow | Appropriate Scope |
|---|---|
| The Battle of Gettysburg lasted three days. | The Battle of Gettysburg marked the Civil War’s turning point by ending Lee’s northern offensive, depleting Confederate resources, and shifting momentum permanently to Union forces. |
| Hamlet contains 4,042 lines. | Hamlet’s unprecedented length allows Shakespeare to develop psychological complexity through extended soliloquies that reveal thought processes rather than just actions. |
| My university has three counselors. | University counseling centers’ inadequate staffing ratios prevent effective mental health intervention, contributing to rising student dropout rates despite increased awareness campaigns. |
Using Weak or Passive Verbs
Weak verbs like “is,” “are,” “was,” and passive voice constructions reduce thesis statement authority and clarity. Active, specific verbs strengthen claims.
Passive Voice Problems
Passive voice obscures agency and weakens assertions. Transform passive constructions into active voice specifying who performs actions.
Passive/Weak: Climate change is caused by various factors including emissions.
Active/Strong: Industrial emissions, agricultural methane, and deforestation accelerate climate change more significantly than transportation, requiring policy prioritizing systemic reform over individual behavior modification.
Inappropriate First-Person Usage
Academic thesis statements typically avoid first-person pronouns, focusing on arguments rather than authors. First-person usage inappropriately emphasizes opinion over evidence.
First-Person Error:
I believe that standardized testing harms education.
Third-Person Correction:
Standardized testing narrows curricula to test preparation while failing to measure critical thinking skills essential for modern workforce success, harming educational quality despite intended accountability goals.
First-Person Error:
In my opinion, social media platforms need regulation.
Third-Person Correction:
Social media companies must face federal regulation similar to telecommunications oversight because algorithmic content curation threatens democratic discourse through documented manipulation of political information.
Trying to Argue Too Much
Thesis statements attempting multiple unrelated arguments create unfocused essays lacking coherent organization. Effective thesis statements advance single central claims.
Identifying Multiple Claim Problems
Multiple claim thesis statements try defending several positions simultaneously, preventing adequate development of any single argument.
Distinguish between multiple unrelated claims and single complex claims with multiple supporting points. Multiple claims: “Social media harms teenagers AND standardized testing should be eliminated AND climate change requires action.” Complex single claim: “Social media harms teenagers through algorithmic amplification, appearance-based comparison, and cyberbullying facilitation.” The first presents three separate arguments; the second develops one argument through three supporting points.
Failing to Show Significance
Thesis statements must convey why arguments matter, passing the “so what?” test. Claims lacking clear significance fail to motivate reader interest or demonstrate argument importance.
Lacks Significance: Shakespeare uses metaphors in his plays.
Shows Significance: Shakespeare’s disease metaphors reveal his understanding that political corruption spreads through social bodies like physical contagion, anticipating modern epidemiological thinking by centuries.
Formatting and Placement Errors
Beyond content weaknesses, formatting and placement mistakes undermine thesis statement effectiveness through structural problems.
Common Formatting Mistakes
- Burying thesis in body paragraphs: Thesis must appear in introduction, not hidden later
- Splitting across multiple sentences: While complex claims may require two sentences, avoid scattering thesis across entire paragraphs
- Placing before context: Provide background before presenting thesis statement
- Using as title: Thesis statements belong in essay body, not titles
Meet Our Thesis Correction Experts
Our specialized academic writers excel at identifying and correcting thesis statement errors across all disciplines, transforming weak claims into compelling arguments.
Stephen Kanyi
Ph.D. in English Literature
Expert in identifying vague language and factual statements in literary analysis. Specializes in transforming descriptive claims into interpretive arguments demonstrating analytical sophistication.
Julia Muthoni
Ph.D. in Sociology
Specializes in correcting scope errors and weak verbs in social science writing. Expert in calibrating thesis statements to evidence availability and page constraints.
Simon Njeri
Ph.D. in Philosophy
Focuses on eliminating announcement language and question formats in argumentative essays. Guides students in asserting definitive positions with appropriate confidence.
Michael Karimi
Master’s in Political Science
Expert in correcting overly broad claims and topic lists in policy analysis. Specializes in creating unified arguments from disconnected observations.
Eric Tatua
Master’s in Communication Studies
Focuses on eliminating first-person usage and passive voice in rhetorical analysis. Expert in strengthening thesis authority through active, specific verbs.
Benson Muthuri
Master’s in Environmental Studies
Expert in correcting factual statements in scientific writing. Assists students in transforming data descriptions into interpretive claims about significance.
Student Success Stories
Students worldwide have transformed their academic writing by learning to identify and correct thesis statement errors, achieving dramatic grade improvements.
“I kept stating facts instead of making arguments. Once I learned to recognize this error and ask ‘so what?’ about every claim, my thesis statements became much stronger. My professor noticed immediately!”
— Marcus T., History Major
“My thesis statements were always too vague with words like ‘aspects’ and ‘factors.’ Learning to replace abstract terms with concrete specifics transformed my writing completely. Now I know exactly what makes thesis statements weak.”
— Angela R., Psychology Student
“Understanding scope problems changed everything. I was trying to write about enormous topics in 5-page papers. Now I narrow thesis statements appropriately and my analysis has real depth instead of superficial treatment.”
— Kevin L., Political Science Student
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the most common thesis statement mistake?
Stating facts instead of arguable claims represents the most frequent thesis error. Facts require no defense because everyone accepts them as true, eliminating the essay argumentative purpose. Examples include “Shakespeare wrote Hamlet” or “Climate change involves rising temperatures”—verifiable information lacking controversy. Transform facts into arguments by adding interpretation, evaluation, or analysis, answering “so what?” questions about significance. This fundamental error undermines entire essays by removing claims requiring defense through evidence and reasoning.
How do I know if my thesis statement is too vague?
Vague thesis statements use abstract terms like “aspects,” “factors,” “things,” or “ways” without specifying what you mean. They could apply to numerous situations without providing clear direction for specific essays. Test by asking whether readers could understand your exact argument without reading body paragraphs—if they’d remain uncertain about your position, your thesis is too vague. Additionally, if you can’t immediately list specific examples for terms like “various factors” or “many aspects,” you haven’t achieved necessary specificity. Replace abstract language with concrete details naming actual elements, characteristics, or phenomena you’ll examine.
Why shouldn’t thesis statements ask questions?
Thesis statements must answer questions, not pose them, because questions signal uncertainty rather than asserting definitive positions requiring defense. Research questions appropriately guide inquiry during investigation, but thesis statements declare conclusions your essay will prove. Transform interrogative sentences into declarative statements presenting answers: change “How does social media affect teenagers?” to “Social media intensifies teenage anxiety through algorithmic amplification of appearance-based content.” Questions belong in introductions, establishing context, but thesis statements must provide answers demonstrating analytical confidence and giving essays a clear argumentative direction.
What makes a thesis statement too broad?
Overly broad thesis statements promise comprehensive coverage impossible within essay length constraints, attempting to address topics requiring book-length treatment in papers spanning a few pages. Examples include “War shaped human history” or “Technology affects society”—claims so expansive that they permit only superficial analysis, lacking necessary depth. Test the scope by asking whether you can defend your claim thoroughly with available evidence and pages. If your thesis requires addressing multiple centuries, dozens of countries, or innumerable examples, it’s too broad. Narrow by limiting timeframes, geographic focus, specific populations, or particular aspects of broader issues until the scope matches page limits.
Can I fix a weak thesis statement after drafting my essay?
Yes, thesis statement revision after drafting represents normal writing practice and often produces stronger claims than initial attempts. As you draft body paragraphs and engage with evidence, your understanding evolves and clarifies. Many writers discover their actual arguments differ from initial thesis statements, requiring revision to match what the essays actually defend. However, substantial thesis changes may necessitate reorganizing body paragraphs to align with revised claims. Prevent extensive revision needs by crafting strongest possible thesis statements before drafting, but remain open to refinement as your argument develops through writing process itself.
How do I avoid announcement language in thesis statements?
Eliminate phrases like “this essay will discuss,” “I will examine,” or “the purpose of this paper is” that announce intentions rather than state arguments. These constructions shift focus from intellectual content to essay mechanics while weakening authorial confidence. Instead of announcing what you’ll do, directly assert your position: replace “This essay will discuss social media’s effects” with “Social media’s algorithmic amplification polarizes political discourse.” Remove all references to essays, papers, or authors, focusing entirely on claims about your topic. This correction forces direct articulation of positions without hedging qualifiers that signal uncertainty about arguments.
Why do professors mark my thesis statements as “too vague”?
Professors identify thesis statements as vague when claims lack sufficient specificity to guide essay organization or communicate clear positions. Vague thesis statements leave instructors uncertain about your actual argument, requiring body paragraphs to clarify what the thesis should have stated explicitly. This vagueness prevents professors from evaluating whether you understand assignment requirements or possess clear analytical positions. To correct vagueness, replace every abstract term with concrete specifics, name particular phenomena rather than using generic categories, and ensure readers know your exact argument from the thesis alone. Students requiring comprehensive support, eliminating vagueness, benefit from proofreading and editing services, identifying abstract language requiring replacement with precision.
Should I completely rewrite bad thesis statements or just fix errors?
Correction approach depends on error severity and thesis fundamental soundness. Minor issues like announcement language, first-person pronouns, or weak verbs require targeted fixes preserving core arguments. However, fundamental problems—stating facts instead of arguments, scope mismatches, or lacking arguability—necessitate complete rewrites starting from scratch. If your thesis fails the “so what?” test, lacks clear positions, or couldn’t generate multiple body paragraphs defending it, rewrite rather than patch. Conversely, if your thesis advances arguable claims with appropriate scope but suffers formatting or language weaknesses, targeted corrections suffice. When uncertain whether to fix or rewrite, consult instructors or utilize expert guidance ensuring thesis statements meet rigorous academic standards.
Need Expert Help Identifying and Correcting Thesis Errors?
Our professional academic writers specialize in diagnosing thesis statement weaknesses and transforming flawed claims into compelling arguments. From eliminating vague language to correcting scope problems, we ensure your thesis statements meet rigorous academic standards.
Diagnostic Checklist for Thesis Statement Errors
Use this systematic checklist to evaluate your thesis statements for common errors before submitting essays.
Content Errors to Check:
- Does thesis state a fact everyone accepts as true?
- Could reasonable people disagree with this claim?
- Have I used vague terms like “aspects,” “factors,” or “things”?
- Can I name specific examples for every general term?
- Does thesis answer a question or ask one?
- Have I merely listed topics without unifying argument?
- Can I defend this claim thoroughly within page limits?
- Does thesis pass the “so what?” test of significance?
Language Errors to Check:
- Have I used announcement phrases like “this essay will”?
- Does thesis include first-person pronouns unnecessarily?
- Am I using weak verbs like “is” or passive voice?
- Have I hedged with words like “seems,” “might,” or “perhaps”?
- Does every word contribute meaningfully to the claim?
Structure Errors to Check:
- Does thesis appear at introduction conclusion?
- Is thesis stated in one or two focused sentences?
- Have I provided context before presenting thesis?
- Does thesis match my actual essay content?
Conclusion
Recognizing and avoiding common thesis statement mistakes transforms your academic writing by ensuring central claims provide clear direction, advance arguable positions, and demonstrate analytical sophistication appropriate to assignment requirements. The errors examined throughout this guide—stating facts instead of arguments, using vague language, announcing intentions, posing questions, listing topics, mismatching scope, employing weak verbs, and using inappropriate first-person—represent systematic weaknesses you can learn to identify and correct through deliberate practice and self-evaluation.
Understanding why these errors weaken essays enables proactive correction rather than reactive revision after receiving poor grades. Factual statements eliminate argumentative purpose. Vague language provides no clear direction. Announcements undermine authorial confidence. Questions signal uncertainty rather than asserting positions. Topic lists create disconnected organization. Scope mismatches force superficial analysis or insufficient content. Weak verbs reduce claim authority. Each error type damages essays in specific, identifiable ways that systematic thesis evaluation prevents.
The diagnostic questions and correction examples provided throughout this guide offer concrete strategies for strengthening thesis statements before submission. Apply these evaluation criteria to every thesis statement you write, asking whether your claims advance arguable positions using specific language appropriate to essay scope. When uncertain about thesis quality or struggling to correct identified weaknesses, expert academic writers provide personalized guidance transforming flawed claims into compelling arguments that anchor successful essays across all disciplines and assignment types.
Remember that even experienced writers make thesis statement mistakes during initial drafting—the difference lies in recognizing weaknesses and applying systematic correction strategies before finalizing essays. View thesis statement construction as iterative process requiring multiple revisions rather than single attempt. Each error you learn to identify builds evaluative judgment transferable across future assignments, strengthening your academic writing capabilities permanently rather than just improving individual papers.
Create a personal thesis statement evaluation routine applied before every submission. Print the diagnostic checklist from this guide and systematically test each thesis against error criteria, marking specific weaknesses requiring correction. Over time, this deliberate practice internalizes quality standards, enabling you to recognize weaknesses instinctively during drafting rather than only during revision. Additionally, exchange thesis statements with peers for reciprocal evaluation—others often spot errors you’ve missed through familiarity with your own writing. Combine self-evaluation with peer review and, when stakes are high, professional assessment ensuring thesis statements meet rigorous academic standards before final submission. This multi-layered approach prevents errors while building evaluative skills strengthening all aspects of your academic writing permanently.
