Evolution of American Ways of Warfare Throughout Modern Military History

The study of military history reveals that the manner in which nations wage war is not static but rather a dynamic interplay of strategic thinking, operational execution, technological innovation, and the socio-political context in which conflicts occur. Understanding the “American Ways of Warfare” necessitates a comprehensive examination of these elements across different periods of modern American military history. This analysis will explore the defining characteristics of this concept, trace its evolution from the early 20th century to the present day, identify enduring continuities, and synthesize these findings to provide a nuanced understanding of how American military practices have transformed over time.

1. Defining the American Way of Warfare

Defining the “American Ways of Warfare” requires acknowledging the diverse perspectives offered by military historians and strategists. While a singular, universally accepted definition remains elusive, common themes emerge that provide a framework for analysis. At its core, the concept encompasses the strategic doctrines guiding the employment of military force, the operational approaches used to achieve military objectives, the reliance on technology to enhance warfighting capabilities, the methods of force projection across different theaters, and the intricate relationship between the military establishment and American society.¹

Russell Weigley’s seminal work posited that the American way of war has historically been characterized by a pursuit of decisive victory, often through the application of overwhelming force aimed at the annihilation of the enemy’s capacity to wage war.³ This focus on achieving a crushing military triumph suggests a potential inclination towards seeking clear and definitive outcomes in conflict.¹ This preference for decisive results might be linked to America’s historical experience of fighting wars that were relatively geographically distant from its homeland in its early stages.

In contrast, Brian Linn argued that the American way of war is better understood as an adaptive approach, where the military demonstrates a capacity for improvisation and adjustment in response to the specific circumstances of different conflicts, particularly in the context of counterinsurgencies and peace-building operations.¹ This perspective highlights the flexibility inherent in American military conduct, suggesting an ability to tailor strategies to diverse operational environments beyond conventional warfare scenarios.

Colin Gray offered a broader set of characteristics, suggesting that the American way of war tends to be ‘apolitical’, ‘a-strategic’, ‘ahistorical’, ‘culturally ignorant’, ‘technologically dependent’, ‘firepower focused’, ‘impatient’, and oriented towards ‘large-scale’ operations.¹ This critique points to potential systemic weaknesses, such as a possible overemphasis on tactical and operational aspects at the expense of deeper strategic thinking, a neglect of historical context, and insufficient understanding of cultural nuances in conflict zones. The inclination towards ‘large-scale’ operations reinforces the notion of a preference for overwhelming force.

Max Boot introduced the concept of a “New American Way of War” emerging in the post-Cold War era, characterized by an emphasis on speed, maneuver, precision firepower, and the use of special operations forces to achieve swift victories.¹ This view reflects the impact of technological advancements in the late 20th century and a desire for rapid interventions with minimal American casualties in a potentially less constrained global environment.

Antulio Echevarria contended that what primarily exists is an American “way of battle,” focused on achieving military victory, which is often not effectively integrated with overarching political objectives and tends to overlook the critical phase of post-conflict stabilization and reconstruction.³ This distinction underscores a potential gap between tactical successes on the battlefield and the attainment of broader strategic and political goals.

Ultimately, the American Way of Warfare should not be viewed as a monolithic doctrine but rather as a dynamic and evolving set of tendencies and approaches. It is characterized by a complex interplay between the pursuit of decisive military victory through the application of significant force, a pragmatic adaptability to diverse conflict environments, a strong and consistent reliance on technological superiority, and an ongoing challenge in effectively integrating military actions with overarching strategic and political objectives.¹

2. The Early to Mid-20th Century: Industrialization and the Dawn of Modern War (Pre-Korean War)

The late 19th and early 20th centuries witnessed a transformative period of rapid industrialization in the United States, which profoundly impacted the nation’s military capabilities and its approach to warfare.⁶ This era saw the mass production of weapons with unprecedented accuracy, power, and range, providing the material foundation for a modern military capable of engaging in large-scale conflicts.⁶ The ability to standardize and mass-produce sophisticated armaments, from individual firearms to artillery pieces, enabled the swift equipping of large armies and the potential for overwhelming firepower on the battlefield. This period also marked the burgeoning of the military-industrial complex, with a growing interconnectedness between the civilian manufacturing sector and the needs of the armed forces.⁶

Simultaneously, advancements in transportation and communication technologies, particularly the widespread adoption of steamships, railroads, and the telegraph, revolutionized military logistics and command and control.⁶ Railroads facilitated the rapid mobilization and movement of troops and supplies across vast continental distances, while steamships enabled the projection of military power overseas. The telegraph provided near real-time communication between military commanders in the field and the government in Washington, significantly impacting strategic decision-making and the overall conduct of military operations.⁶

The United States’ involvement in World War I (1917-1918) served as a pivotal moment in shaping its military thinking.¹⁵ Initially adhering to a policy of neutrality, the nation eventually shifted towards intervention due to Germany’s unrestricted submarine warfare and the revelation of the Zimmermann Telegram. This experience underscored the challenges of maintaining isolationism in an increasingly interconnected world and highlighted the significant role of public opinion in supporting military action. The US had to rapidly mobilize a large army through conscription, facing the considerable logistical challenges of deploying and supplying millions of troops across the Atlantic to a war that had already been raging for three years.

WWI also witnessed the introduction of new military technologies, including tanks, aircraft, and chemical weapons.⁶ However, the adaptation of military tactics to this rapidly evolving technological landscape was slow and often came at a heavy cost in terms of casualties. The initial reliance on traditional offensive maneuvers proved devastating against the entrenched positions and machine-gun fire that characterized the Western Front.²² The US entered the war as an “Associated Power,” pursuing its own strategic objectives, with President Wilson emphasizing a just peace and advocating for the establishment of the League of Nations, signaling a departure from traditional isolationism.

The early 20th century also marked the nascent development of air and naval power as distinct and increasingly important branches of the US military. While initial progress in aviation was gradual, WWI served as a crucial catalyst for recognizing the military potential of aircraft for reconnaissance, bombing, and achieving air superiority.¹⁷ The war spurred the initial development of strategic and tactical air doctrines, laying the foundation for the future dominance of air power.²⁸ In naval power, the US had already embarked on a significant modernization program in the late 19th century, shifting from sail to steam and constructing a modern, steel-hulled fleet.¹¹ The focus on naval power strategy, heavily influenced by the theories of Alfred Thayer Mahan, emphasized sea control and the importance of a strong navy for projecting national power, a capability demonstrated by the voyage of the Great White Fleet.¹¹

World War II (1941-1945) profoundly reshaped the American Way of Warfare, solidifying the US as a dominant global military power.²³ Following an initial period of neutrality, the attack on Pearl Harbor propelled the US into a total mobilization effort, transforming its industrial might into an “arsenal of democracy” that outproduced its enemies and allies alike. Air power emerged as a decisive factor, with the US employing strategic bombing campaigns against Germany and Japan and providing crucial tactical support to ground forces. Naval power, particularly in the Pacific theater, proved critical through aircraft carriers, amphibious landings, and the innovative island-hopping strategy. Furthermore, WWII witnessed the rapid development and deployment of groundbreaking technologies such as radar, sonar, and the atomic bomb, forever altering the nature and scale of warfare.

The period leading up to the Korean War saw the United States emerge from WWII as a dominant military power with a formidable navy and an ascendant air force. The experiences of these two global conflicts profoundly shaped American military doctrine and its approach to future warfare, setting the stage for its role in the emerging Cold War.

3. The Cold War Era: Containment, Limited Wars, and the Nuclear Age (Korean War and Vietnam War)

The dawn of the Cold War introduced a new dimension to American strategic thinking, largely shaped by the development and proliferation of nuclear weapons.⁶⁷ The concept of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) emerged as a central tenet, recognizing that a full-scale nuclear exchange between the United States and the Soviet Union would result in catastrophic destruction for both sides, effectively making direct military conflict between the superpowers an unthinkable option.³⁵ This nuclear stalemate fostered an environment of proxy conflicts and ideological competition, where direct military confrontation was avoided in favor of indirect engagement.

Faced with the perceived threat of Soviet expansionism and the high costs of maintaining massive conventional forces, the Eisenhower administration adopted the doctrine of Massive Retaliation.²³ This strategy relied heavily on the threat of a devastating nuclear response to deter any significant communist aggression, prioritizing the development and deployment of a powerful nuclear arsenal and the strategic air power necessary to deliver it.⁸⁰

The overarching strategy that defined the Cold War era for the United States was the concept of containment.⁸⁵ The Truman Doctrine, articulated in 1947, committed the United States to providing political, military, and economic assistance to democratic nations resisting the influence of external or internal authoritarian forces, primarily aimed at stemming the spread of communism.⁷⁷ This doctrine marked a significant departure from traditional American isolationism and laid the foundation for numerous interventions across the globe throughout the Cold War. The strategy of containment became increasingly globalized, extending beyond its initial focus on Europe to encompass Asia, the Middle East, and Latin America, reflecting the perceived need to counter communist influence wherever it emerged.⁷⁷

The Korean War (1950-1953) served as the first major test of the US containment strategy in Asia and ushered in the era of “limited war”.³¹ The United States, acting under a United Nations mandate, intervened to prevent the communist North Korea from conquering South Korea.³⁵ This conflict was characterized by specific political objectives – preventing the fall of South Korea – without seeking the total defeat of North Korea, primarily to avoid escalating the conflict into a broader war with the Soviet Union or China.⁹¹ The war also brought to the forefront the tension between civilian control of the military and the strategic views of military commanders, exemplified by the confrontation between President Truman and General MacArthur over the conduct of the war and the decision to limit its scope.¹¹¹ The intervention of Chinese forces in late 1950 dramatically altered the course of the war, pushing back UN forces and resulting in a protracted stalemate around the 38th parallel.⁷⁷ Public opinion, initially strongly supportive of the intervention, gradually shifted towards disillusionment as the war dragged on with mounting casualties and no decisive victory in sight.¹⁰⁶

The Vietnam War (1955-1975) represented another significant chapter in the evolution of American Ways of Warfare during the Cold War, marking a prolonged and complex engagement in a counterinsurgency environment.³³ US involvement escalated gradually over two decades, starting with military advisors and eventually leading to the deployment of hundreds of thousands of combat troops.³⁵ The domino theory, rooted in the broader concept of containment, heavily influenced US policy decisions, with the fear that the fall of South Vietnam to communism would trigger the collapse of other nations in Southeast Asia.⁷⁷ However, the war was fought with often ambiguous political objectives and significant constraints on military operations, making it difficult for the US military to achieve a decisive victory against the guerrilla tactics of the Viet Cong and the North Vietnamese Army.⁹⁹ The war also generated increasingly widespread and intense domestic opposition, significantly impacting political leadership and military morale.¹²⁷ Despite the application of superior American technology, including air power and advanced weaponry, the US struggled to develop a winning strategy against a determined enemy employing effective guerrilla warfare tactics in challenging terrain.²³

The Cold War era, particularly through the experiences of the Korean and Vietnam Wars, highlighted the complexities and challenges of the American Way of Warfare in the context of nuclear deterrence and the strategy of containment. The reliance on technological superiority and conventional military doctrines often proved insufficient in the face of limited wars and counterinsurgency conflicts, while the influence of public opinion and political constraints became increasingly significant factors shaping the conduct and ultimate outcomes of these engagements. The Vietnam War, in particular, triggered a period of intense national introspection regarding the effectiveness and long-term consequences of American military interventions abroad.

Ways of War by Dr. Matthew Muehlbauer and Dr. David Ulbrich

Works cited

1. Lost in Translation: The American Way of War | Small Wars Journal …, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://smallwarsjournal.com/2011/11/17/lost-in-translation-the-american-way-of-war/
2. The American Way of War in History and Politics – Gresham College, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.gresham.ac.uk/watch-now/american-way-war-history-and-politics
3. www.govinfo.gov, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-D101-PURL-LPS47743/pdf/GOVPUB-D101-PURL-LPS47743.pdf
4. www.files.ethz.ch, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/14216/Toward%20and%20American%20Way%20of%20War.pdf
5. Strategic Anarchy and the American Way of War* – Military Strategy Magazine, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.militarystrategymagazine.com/article/strategic-anarchy-and-the-american-way-of-war/
6. The Impact of the Industrial Revolution on Warfare, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.wzaponline.com/yahoo_site_admin/assets/docs/InductrialRevolution.292125935.pdf
7. Industrial Revolution Primacy: An Assessment of Western Warfare’s Most Impactful Military Revolution – Civil Affairs Association, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.civilaffairsassoc.org/post/industrial-revolution-primacy-an-assessment-of-western-warfare-s-most-impactful-military-revolution
8. How Did the United States Become a Global Power? – CFR Education, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://education.cfr.org/learn/reading/how-did-united-states-become-global-power
9. World War II and the Industrialization of the American South | The Journal of Economic History | Cambridge Core, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-economic-history/article/world-war-ii-and-the-industrialization-of-the-american-south/B02C45F9CB7CBE9F6568EAC33F2EF0C1
10. How the Second Industrial Revolution Changed Americans’ Lives | HISTORY, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.history.com/articles/second-industrial-revolution-advances
11. U.S. Industrialization and Naval Technology before the Spanish-American War – The Sextant, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://usnhistory.navylive.dodlive.mil/Recent/Article-View/Article/3425958/us-industrialization-and-naval-technology-before-the-spanish-american-war/
12. Overview | Rise of Industrial America, 1876-1900 | U.S. History Primary Source Timeline | Classroom Materials at the Library of Congress, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.loc.gov/classroom-materials/united-states-history-primary-source-timeline/rise-of-industrial-america-1876-1900/overview/
13. American Industrial Revolution | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/american-industrial-revolution
14. Strategic Analysis: Impact of Technology on Conduct of Warfare, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://ciaotest.cc.columbia.edu/olj/sa/sa_99anv02.html
15. World War I: Building the American military | Article | The United States Army, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.army.mil/article/185229/world_war_i_building_the_american_military
16. United States in World War I – Wikipedia, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_in_World_War_I
17. Americans Answer Call to Arms During World War I – Department of Defense, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/2839338/americans-answer-call-to-arms-during-world-war-i/
18. U.S. Enters the War | National WWI Museum and Memorial, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.theworldwar.org/learn/about-wwi/us-enters-war
19. The U.S. During World War I – Division of Historical and Cultural Affairs – State of Delaware, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://history.delaware.gov/world-war-i/us-involvement-world-war-i/
20. The American Expeditionary Forces | A World at War | Articles and Essays | Stars and Stripes: The American Soldiers’ Newspaper of World War I, 1918-1919 | Digital Collections | Library of Congress, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.loc.gov/collections/stars-and-stripes/articles-and-essays/a-world-at-war/american-expeditionary-forces/
21. Tactics in warfare during World War I – Anzac Portal – DVA, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://anzacportal.dva.gov.au/wars-and-missions/ww1/military-organisation/tactics-in-warfare
22. US Performance in WWI : r/WarCollege – Reddit, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/WarCollege/comments/dk9md8/us_performance_in_wwi/
23. Technology and the Nature of War – Marine Corps Association, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.mca-marines.org/gazette/technology-and-the-nature-of-war/
24. US Military History, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.military.com/history
25. Civil War Technology – Weapons, Military, Advancements – HISTORY, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.history.com/topics/american-civil-war/civil-war-technology
26. Demobilization of United States Armed Forces after World War II – Wikipedia, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demobilization_of_United_States_Armed_Forces_after_World_War_II
27. United States Participation in World War One, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://peacehistory-usfp.org/ww1/
28. Evolution of the Department of the Air Force, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.afhistory.af.mil/FAQs/Fact-Sheets/Article/458985/evolution-of-the-department-of-the-air-force/
29. Our History – U.S. Air Force, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.airforce.com/history
30. History of the United States Air Force – Wikipedia, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_United_States_Air_Force
31. Airpower in the Korean War – Wings & Things Guest Lecture Series, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/Portals/7/documents/transcripts/airpower_in_korean_war_transcript.pdf
32. Air Power History – From Balloons to Drones, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://balloonstodrones.com/category/air-power-history/
33. Name that Doctrine – Air University, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/Portals/10/ASPJ/journals/Chronicles/landfair.pdf
34. Strategic Air Warfare – Department of Defense, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://media.defense.gov/2010/Sep/29/2001329790/-1/-1/0/strategic_air_warfare.pdf
35. Military history of the United States – Wikipedia, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_history_of_the_United_States
36. US Interventions – Global Policy Forum, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://archive.globalpolicy.org/us-westward-expansion/26024-us-interventions.html
37. Birth of the U.S. Navy – Naval History and Heritage Command, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.history.navy.mil/browse-by-topic/heritage/origins-of-the-navy/birth-of-the-us-navy.html
38. The First Korean Conflict | Naval History Magazine – April 2017 Volume 31, Number 2, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.usni.org/magazines/naval-history-magazine/2017/april/first-korean-conflict
39. History of the United States Navy – Wikipedia, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_United_States_Navy
40. NAVAL HISTORY – Department of Defense, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://media.defense.gov/2014/Feb/21/2002655433/-1/-1/1/140221-N-ZZ182-5352.pdf
41. United States Navy – Wikipedia, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Navy
42. www.cambridge.org, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-history-of-the-second-world-war/us-grand-strategy-19391945/941B45289059CC35B81D265E6CF7F0AF#:~:text=Implementing%20the%20American%20strategy%20for,military%20power%20across%20two%20oceans.
43. The Pacific Strategy, 1941-1944 | The National WWII Museum | New Orleans, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.nationalww2museum.org/war/articles/pacific-strategy-1941-1944
44. US grand strategy, 1939–1945 (Chapter 7) – The Cambridge History of the Second World War, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-history-of-the-second-world-war/us-grand-strategy-19391945/941B45289059CC35B81D265E6CF7F0AF
45. America’s Victory in WWII: Key Strategies & Impact – What is Social Studies?, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://socialstudieshelp.com/american-history-lessons/wwii-ends/
46. 51a. Wartime Strategy – USHistory.org, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.ushistory.org/us/51a.asp
47. Take A Closer Look: America Goes to War | The National WWII Museum | New Orleans, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.nationalww2museum.org/students-teachers/student-resources/research-starters/america-goes-war-take-closer-look
48. was the US Army incompetent during World War ii? : r/AskHistorians – Reddit, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/100m2n7/was_the_us_army_incompetent_during_world_war_ii/
49. World War II: Military Strategy [APUSH Review Unit 7 Topic 13] Period 7: 1898-1945, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v6awds-Jyco&pp=0gcJCfcAhR29_xXO
50. D-Day Doctrine: Six Elements for a Successful Landing | The National WWII Museum, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.nationalww2museum.org/war/articles/d-day-doctrine-six-elements-successful-landing
51. What were the military doctrines of the WW2 powers? : r/AskHistory – Reddit, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistory/comments/1c6tam7/what_were_the_military_doctrines_of_the_ww2_powers/
52. Firepower, Attrition, Maneuver— US Army Operations Doctrine, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Journals/Military-Review/English-Edition-Archives/MR-75th-Anniversary/75th-Downing/
53. A New Look at Operational Art: How We View War Dictates How We Fight It – NDU Press, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://ndupress.ndu.edu/Media/News/News-Article-View/Article/2498208/a-new-look-at-operational-art-how-we-view-war-dictates-how-we-fight-it/
54. Military history of the United States during World War II – Wikipedia, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_history_of_the_United_States_during_World_War_II
55. Leadership and Operational Art in World War II: The Case for General Lesley J. McNair, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://ndupress.ndu.edu/Media/News/Article/1038851/leadership-and-operational-art-in-world-war-ii-the-case-for-general-lesley-j-mc/
56. Command and Control: US Army Staffs and the Operations Process – DTIC, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/AD1022150.pdf
57. A Brief History of Operational Art in US Army Doctrine – DTIC, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/trecms/pdf/AD1161665.pdf
58. How Technology Changed Warfare: Perspectives from Veterans Across Eras – Warrior Allegiance : Are you VA Rated 90% or less? Let’s talk., accessed on April 7, 2025, https://warriorallegiance.com/how-technology-changed-warfare-perspectives-from-veterans-across-eras/
59. Innovating for Victory | The National WWII Museum | New Orleans, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.nationalww2museum.org/war/articles/innovating-victory
60. The Scientific and Technological Advances of World War II | The National WWII Museum | New Orleans, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.nationalww2museum.org/war/articles/scientific-and-technological-advances-world-war-ii
61. The Science and Technology of World War II – NCPedia.org, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.ncpedia.org/anchor/science-and-technology-world
62. Technology during World War II – Wikipedia, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology_during_World_War_II
63. The World Afire: World War II, Technology of a Modern War – OER Commons, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://oercommons.org/courseware/lesson/88052/student-old/
64. Technology and War Strategy | Beyond the Horizon ISSG, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://behorizon.org/technology-and-war-strategy/
65. World War II’s Indelible Influence on Technology – Tech News World, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.technewsworld.com/story/world-war-iis-indelible-influence-on-technology-86775.html
66. TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION DURING PROTRACTED WAR: RADAR AND ATOMIC WEAPONS IN WORLD WAR II April 2015 – Esd.whs.mil, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/FOID/Reading%20Room/Litigation_Release/Litigation%20Release%20-%20Technological%20Innovation%20During%20Protracted%20War%20Radar%20and%20Atomic%20Weapons%20in%20WWII%20%20201504.pdf
67. Between the end of World War 2 and the start of the Korean War, what did the US military have planned in terms of reforms, doctrine, equipment, etc. for the 50s and beyond? : r/WarCollege – Reddit, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/WarCollege/comments/11bp5xp/between_the_end_of_world_war_2_and_the_start_of/
68. United States war plans (1945–1950) – Wikipedia, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_war_plans_(1945%E2%80%931950)
69. The Early War Plans | Air & Space Forces Magazine, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.airandspaceforces.com/article/1212war/
70. U.S. Joint War Planning for Twentieth Century Large Scale Combat Operations – DTIC, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/trecms/pdf/AD1160006.pdf
71. About: United States war plans (1945–1950) – DBpedia, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://dbpedia.org/page/United_States_war_plans_(1945%E2%80%931950)
72. A Primer on US Strategic Nuclear Policy – UNT Digital Library, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc720111/m2/1/high_res_d/776355.pdf
73. American war plans, 1945-1950 – Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://librarysearch.mbzuai.ac.ae/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma9956911209106&context=L&vid=971MBZUAI_INST:971MBZUAI_INST&lang=en&search_scope=MyInstitution&adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&tab=LibraryCatalog&query=sub%2Cequals%2CSoviet%20Union%20–%20Foreign%20relations%20–%20United%20States%2CAND&mode=advanced&offset=0
74. The Role of Air Force Reconnaissance in War Planning, 1945 – 1953 – DTIC, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA249785.pdf
75. Deterrence and American national security – Brill, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://brill.com/edcollchap/book/9789004640467/B9789004640467_s016.pdf
76. The Role of Air Force Reconnaissance in War Planning 1945 – 1953, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.koreanwar.org/pdf-reference/a460023.pdf
77. The impact of the Korean War on Soviet- American relations. – Essex Student Journal, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://publications.essex.ac.uk/esj/article/162/galley/385/download/
78. Cold War | Summary, Causes, History, Years, Timeline, & Facts | Britannica, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/event/Cold-War
79. Cold War (1953–1962) – Wikipedia, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_War_(1953%E2%80%931962)
80. General MacArthur’s Strategic Success During the Early Months of the Korean War – DTIC, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA567577.pdf
81. “Come As You Are” War: U.S. Readiness for the Korean Conflict, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://ahec.armywarcollege.edu/documents/U.S._Readiness.pdf
82. Five Korean War ‘Firsts’ Had Lasting Impacts – Department of Defense, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/article/3483261/five-korean-war-firsts-had-lasting-impacts/
83. The Evolution of US Army Tactical Doctrine, 1946-76, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Portals/7/combat-studies-institute/csi-books/doughty.pdf
84. Change and Continuity in Twentieth-Century America – Knowledge Bank, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://kb.osu.edu/bitstream/1811/6200/1/CHANGE_AND_CONTINUITY_IN_TWENTIETH-CENTURY_AMERICA_THE_1920_S.pdf
85. The History of the Department of Defense, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.defense.gov/Multimedia/Experience/The-History-of-the-Department-of-Defense/
86. The Truman Doctrine, 1947 – Milestones in the History of U.S. Foreign Relations – Office of the Historian, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://history.state.gov/milestones/1945-1952/truman-doctrine
87. Military doctrine – Wikipedia, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_doctrine
88. The Tao of Doctrine: Contesting an Art of Operations – National Defense University Press, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://ndupress.ndu.edu/Media/News/Article/830866/the-tao-of-doctrine-contesting-an-art-of-operations/
89. What changed in US military doctrine and strategy after the Vietnam War, and how would the USA handle the same war today? – Reddit, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/WarCollege/comments/acrf7u/what_changed_in_us_military_doctrine_and_strategy/
90. Full article: US Entry into the Korean War: Origins, Impact, and Lessons, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/25751654.2022.2053407
91. Korean War | Eisenhower Presidential Library, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.eisenhowerlibrary.gov/research/online-documents/korean-war
92. From Korea to Vietnam: The Evolution of U.S. Interventionism in Asia Mel Gurtov Portland State University ABSTRACT The wars in K – Columbia International Affairs Online, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://ciaotest.cc.columbia.edu/journals/ijoks/v14i2/f_0019551_16697.pdf
93. The Korean War 101: Causes, Course, and Conclusion of the Conflict, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.asianstudies.org/publications/eaa/archives/the-korean-war-101-causes-course-and-conclusion-of-the-conflict/
94. Koreans and the Early Cold War | Oxford Research Encyclopedia of American History, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://oxfordre.com/americanhistory/display/10.1093/acrefore/9780199329175.001.0001/acrefore-9780199329175-e-1016?p=emailA6QW6ZuqpPbU6&d=/10.1093/acrefore/9780199329175.001.0001/acrefore-9780199329175-e-1016
95. Overview of the Korean War and its Legacy | FSI, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://spice.fsi.stanford.edu/docs/overview_of_the__korean_war_and_its_legacy
96. Truman intervenes in Korea, Korean War, U.S. history, Cold War, military intervention, foreign policy, presidential decision-making – Bill of Rights Institute, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://billofrightsinstitute.org/essays/truman-intervenes-in-korea
97. US Enters the Korean Conflict – National Archives, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.archives.gov/education/lessons/korean-conflict
98. The United Nations in Korea | Harry S. Truman, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.trumanlibrary.gov/education/presidential-inquiries/united-nations-korea
99. The Firing of MacArthur | Harry S. Truman, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.trumanlibrary.gov/education/presidential-inquiries/firing-macarthur
100. The Sea Services in the Korean War 1950-1953 PCN 19000412100 – Marines.mil, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.marines.mil/portals/1/Publications/The%20Sea%20Services%20in%20the%20Korean%20War%201950-1953%20%20PCN%2019000412100.pdf
101. Airpower in Three Wars – Air University, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/Portals/10/AUPress/Books/B_0089_MOMYER_AIRPOWER.pdf
102. The Cold War’s First Conflict | Naval History Magazine – June 2010 Volume 24, Number 3, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.usni.org/magazines/naval-history-magazine/2010/june/cold-wars-first-conflict
103. Remembering the Not-So-Forgotten War: Korean War Stories of Service in the Navy Log, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.navymemorial.org/tales-from-the-navy-log/2020/7/27/remembering-the-not-so-forgotten-war-korean-war-stories-of-service-in-the-navy-log
104. Korean War order of battle: United States Air Force – Wikipedia, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_War_order_of_battle:_United_States_Air_Force
105. The U.S. Air Force and Army in Korea: How Army Decisions Limited Airpower Effectiveness, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://ndupress.ndu.edu/Media/News/News-Article-View/Article/1681704/the-us-air-force-and-army-in-korea-how-army-decisions-limited-airpower-effectiv/
106. The Korean War and US Public Opinion: June 1950 to January 1951 – American University, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://aura.american.edu/ndownloader/files/41814870
107. The Gloss of War: Revisiting the Korean War’s Legacy – Michigan Law Review, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://michiganlawreview.org/journal/the-gloss-of-war-revisiting-the-korean-wars-legacy/
108. www.va.gov, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.va.gov/opa/publications/factsheets/fs_americas_wars.pdf
109. Men of the Forgotten War: The Korean War and American Masculinity – ScholarWorks – Boise State University, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3268&context=td
110. The Korean War and American Politics – SURFACE at Syracuse University, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://surface.syr.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1098&context=chronos
111. www.ebsco.com, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/truman-macarthur-confrontation#:~:text=MacArthur%20believed%20that%20Asia%E2%80%94not,forces%20in%20Korea.
112. Wars of the USA – VFW Post 3513, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.vfwpost3513.com/wars-of-the-usa
113. BRIA 17 3 b Truman, MacArthur, and the Korean War – Online Lessons – Bill of Rights in Action – Teach Democracy, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://teachdemocracy.org/online-lessons/bill-of-rights-in-action/bria-17-3-b-4
114. www.trumanlibrary.gov, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.trumanlibrary.gov/education/presidential-inquiries/united-nations-korea#:~:text=Truman%20wanted%20to%20keep%20Korea,that%20other%20presidents%20have%20followed.
115. www.trumanlibrary.gov, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.trumanlibrary.gov/education/presidential-inquiries/united-nations-korea#:~:text=Truman’s%20decisions%20during%20the%20Korean,war%20became%20a%20lengthy%20stalemate.
116. Truman-MacArthur Confrontation | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/truman-macarthur-confrontation
117. Harry S. Truman – Korean War, 33rd US President, Cold War | Britannica, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/biography/Harry-S-Truman/Outbreak-of-the-Korean-War
118. Why was Harry S. Truman viewed so negatively back then, with a 22% approval rate, to alot more highly ranked and beloved today? : r/Presidents – Reddit, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Presidents/comments/1b2d9g8/why_was_harry_s_truman_viewed_so_negatively_back/
119. Harry S. Truman: Impact and Legacy – Miller Center, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://millercenter.org/president/truman/impact-and-legacy
120. Forward air control operations during the Korean War – Wikipedia, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forward_air_control_operations_during_the_Korean_War
121. Effects of Doctrine and Experience on Close Air Support Operations in Korea (1950-1951) – DTIC, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA394031.pdf
122. Air Force Doctrine Publication 3-70, Strategic Attack, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.doctrine.af.mil/Portals/61/documents/AFDP_3-70/3-70-AFDP-STRATEGIC-ATTACK.pdf
123. Within Limits: The U.S. Air Force and the Korean War – DTIC, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA440095.pdf
124. Strategic bombing – Wikipedia, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_bombing
125. The Foundations of US Air Doctrine – Air University, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.airuniversity.af.edu/Portals/10/AUPress/Books/B_0008_WATTS_FOUNDATIONS_DOCTRINE.pdf
126. This Page Declassified IAW EO12958 – Air Force Historical Research Agency, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.dafhistory.af.mil/Portals/16/documents/Studies/101-150/AFD-090529-049.pdf
127. A guide to Vietnam War resources: Government documents, oral histories, antiwar movements | Kershner, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://crln.acrl.org/index.php/crlnews/article/view/9387/10562
128. Lyndon Johnson, Vietnam, and Public Opinion: Rethinking Realist Theory of Leadership, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/229492863_Lyndon_Johnson_Vietnam_and_Public_Opinion_Rethinking_Realist_Theory_of_Leadership
129. The Vietnam War at home and abroad: soldiers, military leadership, and the antiwar movement – UTC Scholar, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://scholar.utc.edu/honors-theses/180/
130. Primary Sources: Vietnam War: Anti-War – LibGuides at Florida Atlantic University, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://libguides.fau.edu/vietnam-war/anti-war
131. The US Anti-Vietnam War Movement (1964-1973) | ICNC, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.nonviolent-conflict.org/us-anti-vietnam-war-movement-1964-1973/
132. Lyndon B. Johnson – Vietnam War, Civil Rights, Presidency | Britannica, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/biography/Lyndon-B-Johnson/Election-and-the-Vietnam-War
133. Lyndon B. Johnson and the Vietnam War – Presidential Recordings Digital Edition, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://prde.upress.virginia.edu/content/Vietnam
134. Foreign policy of the Lyndon B. Johnson administration – Wikipedia, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_policy_of_the_Lyndon_B._Johnson_administration
135. The Johnson transition | Miller Center, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://millercenter.org/the-presidency/educational-resources/johnson-transition
136. Vietnam War: Domestic Impact – CQ Almanac Online Edition, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://library.cqpress.com/cqalmanac/document.php?id=cqal70-1292128
137. Analyzing U.S. Involvement in the Vietnam War – DocsTeach, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.docsteach.org/activities/printactivity/us-involvement-in-the-vietnam-war
138. The Vietnam War (article) | 1960s America | Khan Academy, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.khanacademy.org/humanities/us-history/postwarera/1960s-america/a/the-vietnam-war
139. HOTA: Changing nature of the US involvement in Vietnam Flashcards | Quizlet, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://quizlet.com/23754254/hota-changing-nature-of-the-us-involvement-in-vietnam-flash-cards/
140. LBJ’s Conduct of Limited War in Vietnam – Air Force Academy, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.usafa.edu/app/uploads/Harmon33.pdf
141. Lyndon Johnson and Vietnam | United States History II – Lumen Learning, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://courses.lumenlearning.com/wm-ushistory2/chapter/lyndon-johnson-and-vietnam/
142. President Lyndon B. Johnson and His Role in the Vietnam War – 0500HRS.COM, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://0500hrs.com/home/f/president-lyndon-b-johnson-and-his-role-in-the-vietnam-war
143. America’s Involvement | More Than Self: Living the Vietnam War …, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.atlantahistorycenter.com/exhibitions/more-than-self-living-the-vietnam-war/americas-involvement/
144. United States in the Vietnam War – Wikipedia, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_in_the_Vietnam_War
145. Lyndon B. Johnson: Foreign Affairs – Miller Center, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://millercenter.org/president/lbjohnson/foreign-affairs
146. List of wars involving the United States from the 20th century – Wikipedia, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_involving_the_United_States_from_the_20th_century
147. www.atlantahistorycenter.com, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.atlantahistorycenter.com/exhibitions/more-than-self-living-the-vietnam-war/americas-involvement/#:~:text=Over%20the%20course%20of%20the,canals%3B%20mined%20North%20Vietnamese%20ports%3B
148. U.S. Involvement in the Vietnam War: the Gulf of Tonkin and Escalation, 1964, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://history.state.gov/milestones/1961-1968/gulf-of-tonkin
149. War Machines of Afghanistan – Army Technology, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.army-technology.com/features/feature50591/
150. Drones in Afghanistan: Not a Technological “Silver Bullet” – AutoNorms, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.autonorms.eu/drones-in-afghanistan-not-a-technological-silver-bullet/
151. Winning the War of Words: Information Warfare in Afghanistan – Brookings Institution, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/winning-the-war-of-words-information-warfare-in-afghanistan/
152. Iraq wars and the American economy | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/military-history-and-science/iraq-wars-and-american-economy
153. Technology Empowers Information Operations in Afghanistan | AFCEA International, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.afcea.org/signal-media/technology/technology-empowers-information-operations-afghanistan
154. The Secret History of Iraq’s Invisible War – Brookings Institution, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-secret-history-of-iraqs-invisible-war/
155. During the 2003 Iraq Invasion, was there any technology used by either side changing for shifting needs, similar to how in WW1 the Germans stopped using Pickelhaube partly because of Calvary no longer being a thing? : r/WarCollege – Reddit, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/WarCollege/comments/16qk5tl/during_the_2003_iraq_invasion_was_there_any/
156. Technology a dependable ally in Iraq war – Nextgov/FCW, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.nextgov.com/modernization/2004/03/technology-a-dependable-ally-in-iraq-war/236138/
157. Weapons and Technology – American Civil War – Ducksters, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.ducksters.com/history/civil_war/weapons_and_technology.php
158. These machines were supposed to help win the war in Afghanistan. What happened?, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.popsci.com/technology/timeline-us-airborne-tools-of-war-afghanistan/
159. 5 Key Technological Developments of the American Civil War – History Hit, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.historyhit.com/key-technological-developments-of-the-american-civil-war/
160. Civil War Innovations | History Detectives – PBS, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.pbs.org/opb/historydetectives/feature/civil-war-innovations/
161. Civil War Technology: Legacy and Impact – Thomasnet, accessed on April 7, 2025, https://www.thomasnet.com/insights/civil-war-technology/